An analysis of public support for severity and proportionality in the sentencing of youthful offenders

Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 327-342

  Barber, Jody ^a   Doob, Anthony N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442616112     PISSN: 17077753     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3138/cjccj.46.3.327     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Anand, Sanjeev 1999 The good, the bad, and the unaltered: An analysis of Bill C-68, the Youth Criminal Justice Act. Canadian Criminal Law Review 4: 249-270.
2. Anand, Sanjeev 2003 Crafting youth sentences: The roles of rehabilitation, proportionality, restraint, restorative justice, and race under the Youth Criminal Justice Act. Alberta Law Review 40: 943-963.
3. Bala, Nicholas 2003 Youth Criminal Justice Law. Toronto: Irwin Law.
4. Brodeur, Jean-Paul and Julian V. Roberts 2002 Taking justice seriously. Canadian Criminal Law Review 7: 77-91.
5. Canadian Sentencing Commission 1987 Sentencing Reform: A Canadian Approach. Ottawa: Supply and Services Canada.
6. Doob, Anthony N. 2000 Transforming the punishment environment: Understanding public views of what should be accomplished at sentencing. Canadian Journal of Criminology 42: 323-340.
7. Doob, Anthony N. and Carla Cesaroni 2004 Responding to Youth Crime in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
8. Doob, A. N., J.L. Freedman, and J.M. Carlsmith 1973 The effects of sponsor and prepayment on compliance to a mailed request. Journal of Applied Psychology 57: 346-347
9. Doob, Anthony N. and Jane B. Sprott 1999a Canada considers new sentencing laws for youth: A sheep in wolf's clothing? Overcrowded Times 10: 5-11.
10. Doob, Anthony N. and Jane B. Sprott 1999b Changes in the sentencing of youth in Canada. Federal Sentencing Reporter 11: 262-268.
11. Doob, Anthony N. and Jane B. Sprott 2004 Changing models of youth justice in Canada. In Michael Tonry and Anthony N. Doob (vol. eds.), Youth Crime and Youth Justice: Comparative and Cross-National Perspectives. Vol. 31, Crime and Justice: A Review of Research. University of Chicago Press. Forthcoming.
12. Doob, Anthony N., J.B. Sprott, V. Marinos, and Kimberly N. Varma 1998 An Exploration of Ontario Residents' Views of Crime and the Criminal Justice System. Toronto: Centre of Criminology, University of Toronto.
13. Doob, Anthony N. and Cheryl Marie Webster 2003 Sentence severity and crime: Accepting the null hypothesis. In Michael Tonry (vol. ed.), Ethnicity, Crime and Immigration: Comparative and Cross-National Perspectives. Vol. 30, Crime and Justice: A Review of Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Macdonald, Jennifer 2001 Quebec is exceptional in dealing with its wayward youth. Unpublished paper, Centre of Criminology, University of Toronto.
15. McLellan, A. Anne 1998 A Strategy for the Renewal of Youth Justice. Ottawa: Department of Justice.
16. Roberts, Julian and Andrew von Hirsch 1999 Legislating the purpose and principles of sentencing. In Julian V. Roberts and David P. Cole (eds.), Making Sense of Sentencing. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
17. Sprott, Jane B. 1998 Understanding public opposition to a separate youth justice system. Crime and Delinquency 44: 399-411.
18. Sprott, Jane B. and A.N. Doob 1997 Fear, victimization, and attitudes to sentencing, the courts, and the police. Canadian Journal of Criminology 39: 275-291.
19. Statistics Canada 1999 General Social Survey, Cycle 13: Victimization. Public Use Microdata File. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.