Incremental execution of transformation specifications

Conference Record of the Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages

Volumn 31, Issue , 2004, Pages 26-38

  Sittampalam, Ganesh ^a   De Moor, Oege ^a   Larsen, Ken Friis ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b IT UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Constraints; Incremental algorithm; Language factors; Logic programming; Program analysis; Program transformation; Residuation operators; Transformation specification

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; GRAPH THEORY; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; PROGRAM COMPILERS; SEMANTICS;

INCREMENTAL COMPILERS; LOGIC LANGUAGES; PROGRAM TRANSFORMATIONS; RESIDUATION OPERATIONS;

LOGIC PROGRAMMING;

EID: 2442608671     PISSN: 07308566     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/964001.964004     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. U. Aßmann. OPTIMIX - a tool for rewriting and optimizing programs. In H. Ehrig, G. Engels, H. J. Kreowski, and G. Rozenberg, editors, Handbook of Graph Grammars and Computing by Graph Transformation. Volume 2: Applications, Languages and Tools, pages 307-318. World Scientific, 1998.
2. R. C. Backhouse. Closure algorithms and the star-height problem of regular languages. PhD thesis, University of London, 1975.
3. R. C. Backhouse. Fusion on languages. In 10th European Symposium on Programming, ESOP 2001, volume 2028 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 107-121. Springer, 2001.
4. R. C. Backhouse and R. K. Lutz. Factor graphs, failure functions and bi-trees. In A. Salomaa and M. Steinby, editors, Fourth Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, volume 52 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 61-75. Springer Verlag, July 1977.
5. M. Berndl, O. Lhoták, F. Qian, L. Hendren, and N. Umanee. Points-to analysis using BDDs. In ACM Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, pages 103-114, 2003.
6. R. E. Bryant. Graph-based algorithms for Boolean function manipulation. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 35(8):677-691, 1986.
7. J. A. Brzozowski. Derivatives of regular expressions. Journal of the ACM, 11(4):481-494, 1964.
8. M. D. Carroll and B. G. Ryder. Incremental data flow analysis via dominator and attribute updates. In ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pages 274-284, 1988.
9. J. H. Conway. Regular Algebra and Finite Machines. Chapman and Hall, 1971.
10. M. Das, S. Lerner, and M. Seigle. ESP: Path-sensitive program verification in polynomial time. In ACM Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, pages 57-68, 2002.
11. O. de Moor, D. Lacey, and E. Van Wyk. Universal regular path queries. Higher-Order and Symbolic Computation, 16:15-35, 2003.
12. S. J. Drape, O. de Moor, and G. Sittampalam. Path logic programming. In ACM Conference on Principles and Practice of Declarative Programming, pages 133-144, 2002.
13. E. Duesterwald, R. Gupta, and M. L. Soffa. A practical frame-work for demand-driven interprocedural data flow analysis. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 19(6):992-1030, 1997.
14. S. Z. Guyer and C. Lin. An annotation language for optimizing software libraries. In Second conference on Domain-Specific Languages, pages 39-52. USENIX, 1999.
15. S. Hallem, B. Chelf, Y. Xie, and D. Engler. A system and language for building system-specific, static analyses. In ACM Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, pages 69-82, 2002.
16. D. E. Knuth. Semantics of context-free languages. Mathematical Systems Theory, 2(2): 127-145, 1968. Corrections in 5(2):95-96, 1971.
17. D. Lacey. Specifying Compiler Optimisations in Temporal Logic. DPhil thesis, Oxford University Computing Laboratory, 2003.
18. D. Lacey and O. de Moor. Imperative program transformation by rewriting. In R. Wilhelm, editor, Compiler Construction, volume 2027 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 52-68. Springer Verlag, 2001.
19. D. Lacey, N. D. Jones, E. Van Wyk, and C. C. Frederiksen. Proving correctness of compiler optimizations by temporal logic. In ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pages 283-294, 2002.
20. S. Lerner, D. Grove, and C. Chambers. Composing dataflow analyses and transformations. In ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pages 270-282, 2002.
21. S. Lerner, T. Millstein, and C. Chambers. Automatically proving the correctness of compiler optimizations. In ACM Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, pages 220-231, 2003.
22. Y. A. Liu and S. D. Stoller. From Datalog rules to efficient programs with time and space guarantees. In ACM Conference on Principles and Practice of Declarative Programming, pages 172-183, 2003.
23. E. Meijer and J. Gough. A technical overview of the common language infrastructure. Available from URL: http://research.microsoft.com/~emeijer/ Papers/CLR.pdf.
24. K. Olmos and E. Visser. Strategies for source-to-source constant propagation. Technical Report UU-CS-2002-042, Utrecht University, 2002. Available from URL: http://www.cs.uu.nl/research/techreps/UU-CS-2-2002-042.html.
25. R. Paige. Viewing a program transformation system at work. In Manuel Hermenegildo and Jaan Penjam, editors, Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Programming Language Implementation and Logic Programming, pages 5-24. Springer Verlag, 1994.
26. L. Pollock and M. L. Soffa. An incremental version of iterative data flow analysis. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 15(12):1537-1549, 1989.
27. T. W. Reps. Demand interprocedural program analysis using logic databases. In R. Ramakrishnan, editor, Applications of Logic Databases, pages 163-196. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994.
28. T. W. Reps, S. Horwitz, and M. Sagiv. Precise interprocedural dataflow analysis via graph reachability. In ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pages 49-61, 1995.
29. T. Rus and E. Van Wyk. Using model checking in a parallelizing compiler. Parallel processing letters, 8(4):459-471, 1998.
30. B. G. Ryder and M. C. Paull. Incremental data flow analysis algorithms. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 10(1):1-50, 1988.
31. O. V. Sokolsky and S. A. Smolka. Incremental model checking in the modal mu-calculus. In D. L. Dill, editor, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer-aided verification, volume 818 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 351-363. Springer Verlag, 1994.
32. B. Steffen. Data flow analysis as model checking. In Proceedings of Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, volume 526 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 346-364. Springer Verlag, 1991.
33. R. Vallée-Rai, L. Hendren, V. Sundaresan, P. Lam, E. Gagnon, and P. Co. Soot - a Java optimization framework. In Proceedings of GASCON 1999, pages 125-135, 1999.
34. T. L. Veldhuizen and D. Gannon. Active libraries: Rethinking the roles of compilers and libraries. In Proceedings of the SIAM Workshop on Object Oriented Methods for Interoperable Scientific and Engineering Computing. SIAM Press, 1998.
35. E. Visser. Meta-programming with concrete object syntax. In D. Batory, C. Consel, and W. Taha, editors, Generative Programming and Component Engineering, volume 2487 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 299-315. Springer-Verlag, 2002.
36. E. Visser, Z. Benaissa, and A. Tolmach. Building program optimizers with rewriting strategies. In ACM Conference on Functional Programming, pages 13-26, 1998.
37. M. N. Wegman and F. K. Zadeck. Constant propagation with conditional branches. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 13(2):181-210, 1991.
38. D. Whitfield and M. L. Soffa. An approach for exploring code-improving transformations. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 19(6): 1053-1084, 1997.