Assessing state efforts to meet baby boomers' long-term care needs: A case study in compensatory federalism

Journal of Aging and Social Policy

Volumn 14, Issue 3-4, 2002, Pages 161-179

  Pandey, Sanjay K ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Baby boomers; Devolution; Federalism; Long term care; Medicaid; State health policy

Indexed keywords

DEVOLUTION; ELDERLY CARE; FEDERAL SYSTEM; HEALTH POLICY; SOCIAL POLICY; STATE ROLE;

AGING; ARTICLE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; LONG TERM CARE; MEDICAID; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; POLITICS; UNITED STATES;

AGING; FINANCING, GOVERNMENT; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; LONG-TERM CARE; MARYLAND; MEDICAID; POLITICS; STATE GOVERNMENT;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 2442606821     PISSN: 08959420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J031v14n03_09     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Alt, P. M., & Marzotto, T. (1999). Federalism and health care. In Kilpatrick, A. O. and Johnson, J. A. (Eds.), Handbook of Health Administration and Policy. New York: Marcel Dekker.
2. Anton, T. (1989). American Federalism and Public Policy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
3. Bardach, E. (2000). A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis: The Eightfold Path to More Effective Problem Solving. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishing.
4. Bloksberg, L. M. (1989). Intergovernmental relations: Change and continuity. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 1, 11-36.
5. Boyd, D. J. (1998). Medicaid devolution: A fiscal perspective. In Thompson, F. J. and DiIulio, J. J. (Eds.), Medicaid and Devolution: A View from the States. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
6. Burwell, B. O., & Rymer, M. P. (1987). Trends in Medicaid eligibility. Health Affairs, 6, 30-45.
7. Center for Health Program Development and Management (1998a). A Symposium on Personal and Public Responsibilities in Meeting Long-Term Care Needs. (Available at http://www.umbc.edu/chpdm/sympsumm.htm; Access Date: June 2001.)
8. Center for Health Program Development and Management (1998b). "Outreach Empowerment Campaign for Individual Long-Term Care Campaign: Presented to Interagency Committee on Aging Services." December 14, 1998, University of Maryland, Baltimore County.
9. Cobb, R. W., & Elder, C. D. (1972). Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda Building. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
10. Daniels, M. R. (1998). Medicaid Reform and the American States: Case Studies on the Politics of Managed Care. Westport, CT: Auburn House.
11. Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (2000). Maryland Medicaid Reform-Phase II-Long-Term Care Status As of June 15, 2000. (Available at http://www.dhmh.state.md.us/hsaea/html/phase2upd.htm; Access Date: June 2001.)
12. Garland, G. (1999). "Poor's care below par, study says." Baltimore Sun, August 28.
13. Grogan, C. M. (1993). Federalism and health care reform. American Behavioral Scientist, 36(6), 741-759.
14. Grogan, C. M. (1991). A Political Theory to Explain the Variation in State Medicaid Policy. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Minnesota.
15. Hackey, R. B. (1998). Rethinking Health Care Policy: The New Politics of State Regulation. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
16. Kaelin, J. J. (1999). "Emerging payer systems for senior health care: Mind, body, money." Presentation at the 17th Annual Conference of the Maryland Gerontological Association, May 17, 1999; Baltimore, Maryland.
17. Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: HarperCollins.
18. Leeds, M. (2000). "Overview of the Medicaid Long-Term Care System in Maryland." Presentation made to the Medicaid Community Access Task Force, October 24. (Available at www.dhmh.state.md.us Access Date: June 20, 2001.)
19. Leichter, H. M. (1996). State governments and their capacity for health care reform. In Rich, R. F. & White, W. D. (Eds.), Health Policy, Federalism and the American States. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
20. LoBianco, M. S., Mills, M. E., & Moore, H. W. (1996). A model for case management of high cost Medicaid users. Nursing Economics, 14, 303-307.
21. Lomas, J. (1999). The evolution of devolution: What does the community want? In Drache, D. and Sullivan, T. (Eds.), Market Limits in Health Reform: Public Success, Private Failure. New York: Routledge.
22. Long-Term Managed Care Advisory Committee (1996). Findings and Recommendations for Long-Term Managed Care in Maryland. November 1. (Available at http://www.umbc.edu/chpdm/ltc.htm; Access Date: June 2001.)
23. Morris, R., Caro, F. G., & Hansan, J. E. (1998). Personal Assistance: The Future of Home Care. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
24. Nathan, R. P. (1993). The role of the states in American federalism. In Van Horn, C. E. (Ed.), The State of the States, 2nd Edition. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
25. Oliver, T. R. (1998). The collision of economics and politics in Medicaid managed care: Reflections on the course of reform in Maryland. The Milbank Quarterly, 76(1), 59-101.
26. Oliver, T. R., & Dowell, E. B. (1994). Interest groups and health reform: Lessons from California. Health Affairs, 13(1), 123-141.
27. Oliver, T. R., & Oliver, K. A. (1998). Managed care or managed politics? Medicaid reforms in Maryland. In Daniels, M. R. (Ed.), Medicaid Reform and the American States: Case Studies on the Politics of Managed Care. Westport, CT: Auburn House.
28. Oliver, T. R., & Paul-Shaheen, P. (1997). Translating ideas into actions: Entrepreneurial leadership in state health care reforms. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 22(3), 721-788.
29. Pandey, S. K., Mussman, M. G., Moore, H. W., Folkemer, J. G., & Kaelin, J. J. (2000). An assessment of Maryland Medicaid's rare and expensive case management program. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 23(4), 457-479.
30. Rich, R. F., & White, W. D. (1996). Health Policy, Federalism and the American States. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
31. Salganik, W. M. (2001). "'No takers for ditched Medicaid enrollees' HMOs tell panel FreeState's 40,000 not cost-effective." Baltimore Sun. January 26.
32. Salganik, W. M. (2000). "'Health care for kids lacking,' study finds administrative glitches in Medicaid blamed." Baltimore Sun. November 1.
33. Schoenman, J. A., Evans, W. N., & Schur, C. L. (1997). Primary care case management for Medicaid recipients: Evaluations of the Maryland Access to Care program. Inquiry, 34, 155-70.
34. Sparer, M. (1996). Medicaid and the Limits of State Health Reform. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
35. Sparer, M. S., & Brown, L. D. (1996). States and the health care crisis: The limits and lessons of laboratory federalism. In Rich, R. F. and White, W. D. (Eds.), Health Policy, Federalism and the American States. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
36. Stuart, M. E., & Weinreich, M. (1998). Beyond managing care: Restructuring care. The Millbank Quarterly, 76(2), 251-280.
37. Sugg, D. (2000). Medicaid care plans penalized. State finds 4 of 8 groups aiding poor fell shy of standards $233,000 in payments held despite sanctions, officials point to gains made in year. Baltimore Sun, July 26.
38. Sundquist, J. L., & Davis, D. W. (1969). Making Federalism Work. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press.
39. Thompson, F. J. (2001). "Federalism and Health Care Policy: Toward Redefinition?" In R. B. Hackey and D. A. Rochefort (Eds.), The New Politics of State Health Policy. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
40. Thompson, F. J. (1998). The faces of devolution. In F. J. Thompson and J. J. DiIulio (Eds.), Medicaid and Devolution: A View from the States. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
41. Wasserman, M. P. (1997). Plan for long-term managed care in Maryland. (Available at http://www.umbc.edu/chpdm/secp1197.htm; Access Date: June 2001.)
42. Weiner, J. P., Tucker, A. M., Collins, A. M., Fakhraei, H., Liebermann, R., Abrams, C., Trapnell, G. R., & Folkmer, J. G. (1998). The development of risk-adjusted capitation payment system for Medicaid MCOs: The Maryland model. Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, 21(4), 29-52.
43. Wheeler, T. B. (1999). "Maryland paid MCOs millions too much." Baltimore Sun. February 10.
44. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, (2nd Ed.). Beverely Hills, CA: Sage.