Computerized Adaptive Testing with Multiple-Form Structures

Applied Psychological Measurement

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 147-164

  Armstrong, Ronald D ^a,d   Jones, Douglas H ^a   Koppel, Nicole B ^b   Pashley, Peter J ^c  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Law School Admission Council   (United States)

^d RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Automated test assembly; Computerized adaptive testing; Item response theory; Multiple form structures

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442597992     PISSN: 01466216     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146621604263652     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Armstrong, R. D., Jones, D. H., & Kunce, C. S. (1998). IRT test assembly using network-flow programming. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 237-247.
2. Armstrong, R. D., & Roussos, L. (2003). A method to determine targets for multi-stage adaptive tests. Manuscript under review.
3. Bock, R., Muraki, E., & Pfeiffenberger, W. (1988). Item pool maintenance in the presence of item parameter drift. Journal of Educational Measurement, 25, 275-285.
4. Boekkooi-Timminga, E. (1990). The construction of parallel tests from IRT-based item pools. Journal of Educational Statistics, 15, 129-145.
5. Fisher, M. L. (1981). The Lagrangian relaxation method for solving integer programming problems. Management Science, 27, 1-18.
6. Fisher, M. L. (1985). An applications oriented guide to Lagrangian relaxation. Interfaces, 15, 10-21.
7. Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8. Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (1995). Test equating methods and practices. New York: Springer.
9. Lord, F. (1971). A theoretical study of two stage testing. Psychometrika, 36, 227-242.
10. Lord, F. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Luecht, R. M., & Nungester, R. J. (1998). Some practical examples of computer-adaptive sequential testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35(3), 229-249.
12. Nemhauser, G., & Wolsey, L. (1988). Integer and combinatorial optimization. New York: John Wiley.
13. Reese, L. M., & Schnipke, D. L. (1996, June). An evaluation of a two-stage testlet design for computerized adaptive testing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Banff, Alberta, Canada.
14. Stocking, M. L. (1996). An alternative method for scoring adaptive tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 21, 365-389.
15. Theunissen, T. J. J. M. (1985). Binary programming and test design. Psychometrika, 50, 411-420.
16. van der Linden, W. J. (1998). Optimal assembly of psychological and educational tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 195-211.
17. van der Linden, W. J., & Reese, L. M. (1998). A model for optimal constrained adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 259-270.
18. Wainer, H., Dorans, N. J., Flaugher, R., Green, B. F., Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L., et al. (1990). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Wainer, H., & Kiely, G. L. (1987). Item clusters and computerized adaptive testing: A case for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24, 185-201.
20. Weiss, D. J. (1985). Adaptive testing by computer. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 774-789.