Impacts of the Use of E-Mail and the Internet on Personal Trip-Making Behavior

Social Science Computer Review

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 270-280

  Tonn, Bruce E ^a,b   Hemrick, Angela ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

E mail; Education; Income; Internet; Travel

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442587678     PISSN: 08944393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0894439303262581     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Atkinson, R. (1998). Technological change and cities. Cityscape, 3, 129-170.
2. Dewey, J. (2002). Report on trends and conditions research: The impact of the Internet on transportation in Florida-Current economic perspective and possibilities for further research. University of Florida, Bureau of Economic and Business Research. Retrieved from wwwll.myflorida.com/research-center/ Completed_Proj/Summary_PL/FDOT_BC354-44_rpt.pdf
3. Golob, T. (2001). Travel behaviour.com: Activity approaches to modeling the effects of information technology on personal travel behavior. In D. Fensher (Ed.), Travel behaviour research: The leading edge (pp. 145-183). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
4. Golob, T., & Regan, A. (2001). Impacts of information technology on personal travel and commercial vehicle operations: Research challenges and opportunities. Transportation Research, Part C, 9.
5. Hamer, R., Kroes, E., & van Ooststroom, H. (1992). Teleworking in the Netherlands: An evaluation of changes in travel behavior - Further results. Transportation Research Record, 1357, 82-89.
6. Handy, S., & Mokhtarian, P. (1995). Planning for Telecommuting. Journal of the American Planning Association, 61(1), 99-111.
7. Hendricks, S., Winters, P., & Dyehouse, C. (2002, February). Telecommunications and its future role in the public transportation arena. Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida. Retrieved from www.nctr.usf.edu/pdf/NCTR.20Telecommunications.pdf
8. Hu, P., & Young, J. (1999, December). Summary of travel trends-1995 National Personal Transportation Survey. Center for Transportation Analysis, Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Retrieved from www-cta.ornl.gov/npts/1995/Doc/trends_report.pdf
9. Lebo, H. (2000). The UCLA Internet report - "Surveying the digital future," Los Angeles: UCLA Center for Communication Policy. Retrieved from http://ccp.ucla.edu/UCLA-Internet-Report-2000.pdf
10. Lebo, H. (2001). The UCLA Internet Report 2001 - "Surveying the digital future." Los Angeles: UCLA Center for Communication Policy. Retrieved from http://ccp.ucla.edu/UCLA-Internet-Report-2001.pdf
11. Mokhtarian, P. (1997). The transportation impacts of telecommuting: Recent empirical findings. In P. Stopher & M. Lee-Gosselin (Ed.), Understanding travel behaviour in an era of change (pp. 91-106). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
12. Mokhtarian, P. (2000). Telecommunications and travel. Transportation in the new millennium. Washington, DC: Committee on Telecommunications and Travel Behavior, Transportation Research Board.
13. Mokhtarian, P., & Salomon, I. (2002). Emerging travel patterns: Do telecommunications make a difference? In H. S. Mahmassani (Ed.), In perpetual motion: Travel behavior research opportunities and application challenges (pp. 143-182). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
14. Mundorf, N., Xiao, J., Dholakia, R., Dholakia, N., & Zhao, M. (2001). Potential impact of Internet on travel decisions. Working paper from the Research Institute for Telecommunications and Information Marketing. Retrieved from http://ritim.cba.uri.edu/WorkingPapers
15. Nie, N., & Erbring, L. (2000). Internet and society: A preliminary Report. Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society (SIQSS). Retrieved from www.stanford.edu/group/siqss/ Press_Release/Preliminary_Report.pdf
16. Niles, J. (1994). Presentation-Beyond telecommuting: A new paradigm for the effect of telecommunications on travel global telematics (Report DOE/ER-0626). Washington, DC: Department of Energy.
17. Niles, J. (1997). Considering telecommunications for all trip types in a metropolitan region's transportation model (Urban Design, Telecommunication and Travel Forecasting Conference: Summary, Recommendations and Compendium of Papers). Retrieved from http://tmip.fhwa.dot.gov/clearinghouse/docs/udes/niles.stm
18. Niles, J. (2001). Technology & transportation: The dynamic relationship (Inquiry). Seattle, WA: Discovery Institute.
19. Office of Technology Assessment. (1995, September). The technological reshaping of metropolitan America (OTA-ETI-643). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
20. Salomon, I. (1996). Telecommunications, cities and technological opportunism. Annals of Regional Science, 30(1), 75-90.
21. Stough, R., & Paelinck, J. (1997). Substitution and complimentary effects of information on regional travel and location behavior (Urban Design, Telecommunication and Travel Forecasting Conference: Summary, Recommendations, and Compendium of Papers). Retrieved from http://tmip.fhwa.dot.gov/clearinghouse/docs/udes/
22. Tayyaran, M., & Khan, A. (1997). Factors for the study of long-term impacts of telecommuting and intelligent transportation systems on residential and business location choice (Urban Design, Telecommunication and Travel Forecasting Conference: Summary, Recommendations, and Compendium of Papers). Retrieved from http:/ /tmip.fhwa.dot.gov/clearinghouse/docs/udes/
23. Viswanathan, K., & Goulias, K. (2001). Travel behavior implications of information and communications technology in Puget Sound. Transportation Research Record, 1752, 157-165.
24. Wells, K., Douma, F., Loimer, H., Olson, L., & Pansing, C. (2001). Telecommuting implications for travel behavior. Transportation Research Record, 1752, 148-156.
25. Zumkeller, D. (2002). Transportation and telecommunication: First comprehensive surveys and simulation approaches. In H. S. Mahmassani (Ed.), In perpetual motion: Travel behavior research opportunities and application challenges (pp. 183-207). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.