The impact of check sequencing on nsf (not-sufficient funds) fees

Interfaces

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 97-105

  Apte, Aruna ^a   Apte, Uday M ^a   Beatty, Randolph P ^b   Sarkar, Ila C ^c   Semple, John H ^a  

^a SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c Louisiana Health Care Review Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Financial institutions: banks; Programming: integer, applications

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442574824     PISSN: 00922102     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/inte.1030.0039     Document Type: Review

References (6)

1. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. 2002. Annual Report to the Congress on Retail Fees and Services of Depository Institutions. Washington, DC, June 5. Retrieved July 18, 2002 http://www.federalreserve.gov/.
2. Brooks, R. 1999. How banks make the most of bounced checks. Wall Street J. (February 25, Section B) 1.
3. Robertson, S. 2002. New research provides snapshot of U.S. retail payments. Financial Update 15(1, first quarter) 1. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA. Retrieved July 18, 2002 http://www.frbatlanta.org.
4. Shapiro, S., M. Wilk. 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete sample). Biometrika 52(4) 591-611.
5. Thomas, M. 2001. Litigation challenges bank's check-processing practice. San Antonio Bus. J. July 27, 1.
6. Vergari, J. V., V. V. Shue. 1986. Checks, Payments, and Electronic Banking. Practicing Law Institute, New York.