-
2
-
-
33845890179
-
-
Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 508 (1964);
-
(1964)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.13
, pp. 508
-
-
-
14
-
-
0003876939
-
-
Springer-Verlag, Berlin
-
R. Fernández, J. Fröhlich, A.D. Sokal, Random Walks, Critical Phenomena, and Triviality in Quantum Field Theory (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992)
-
(1992)
Random Walks, Critical Phenomena, and Triviality in Quantum Field Theory
-
-
Fernández, R.1
Fröhlich, J.2
Sokal, A.D.3
-
26
-
-
0001651770
-
-
S.J. Chang, Phys Rev. ibid. 12, 1071 (1975);
-
(1975)
Phys Rev.
, vol.12
, pp. 1071
-
-
Chang, S.J.1
-
27
-
-
36049055121
-
-
G. Rosen: Phys. Rev. 173, 1632 (1968);
-
(1968)
Phys. Rev.
, vol.173
, pp. 1632
-
-
Rosen, G.1
-
29
-
-
0001187536
-
-
A more complete list can be found in Refs. [9, 10]
-
J.M. Cornwall, R. Jackiw, and E. Tomboulis, Phys. Rev. D10, 2428 (1974). A more complete list can be found in Refs. [9, 10]
-
(1974)
Phys. Rev.
, vol.D10
, pp. 2428
-
-
Cornwall, J.M.1
Jackiw, R.2
Tomboulis, E.3
-
33
-
-
0001074842
-
-
The existence of two distinct renormalizations can be understood in terms of distinct limits as the spacetime dimension d tends to 4 from above or from below: see P.M. Stevenson: Z. Phys. C 35, 467 (1987)
-
(1987)
Z. Phys. C
, vol.35
, pp. 467
-
-
Stevenson, P.M.1
-
40
-
-
0001475277
-
-
V. Branchina, P. Castorina, M. Consoli, D. Zappalà: Phys. Rev. D42, 3587 (1990);
-
(1990)
Phys. Rev.
, vol.D42
, pp. 3587
-
-
Branchina, V.1
Castorina, P.2
Consoli, M.3
Zappalà, D.4
-
43
-
-
0009239626
-
-
V. Branchina, P. Castorina, M. Consoli, D. Zappalà: Phys. Lett. B 274, 404 (1992);
-
(1992)
Phys. Lett. B
, vol.274
, pp. 404
-
-
Branchina, V.1
Castorina, P.2
Consoli, M.3
Zappalà, D.4
-
46
-
-
1542532444
-
-
R. Akhoury, B. de Wit, P. van Nieuwenhuizen, H. Veltman Eds., World Scientific
-
M. Consoli, in "Gauge Theories Past and Future - in Commemoration of the 60th birthday of M. Veltman", R. Akhoury, B. de Wit, P. van Nieuwenhuizen, H. Veltman Eds., World Scientific 1992, p. 81;
-
(1992)
Gauge Theories Past and Future - in Commemoration of the 60th Birthday of M. Veltman
, pp. 81
-
-
Consoli, M.1
-
52
-
-
33744617799
-
-
Z. Phys. C63 427 (1994).
-
(1994)
Z. Phys.
, vol.C63
, pp. 427
-
-
-
53
-
-
33749872357
-
-
Rice preprint DE-FG05-92ER40717-14 (hep-ph 9407334)
-
4 story, Rice preprint DE-FG05-92ER40717-14 (hep-ph 9407334).
-
4 Story
-
-
-
62
-
-
33749870548
-
-
unpublished; P. Cea, L. Cosmai, M. Consoli, R. Fiore: preprint BARI-TH 204/95, CS-Th 10/9, May 1995 (hep-th/9505948)
-
P. Cea, L. Cosmai (unpublished); P. Cea, L. Cosmai, M. Consoli, R. Fiore: preprint BARI-TH 204/95, CS-Th 10/9, May 1995 (hep-th/9505948)
-
-
-
Cea, P.1
Cosmai, L.2
-
72
-
-
33749865372
-
-
note
-
4 potential in Eq. (3.5) has the exactly the same form as in Ref. [11]. Many authors use λ/4! in place of our λ
-
-
-
-
74
-
-
33749831437
-
-
Nuovo Cimento A94,1 (1986)
-
(1986)
Nuovo Cimento
, vol.A94
, pp. 1
-
-
-
78
-
-
0003575440
-
-
Benjamin, New York
-
Statistical Mechanics, Benjamin, New York, 1972
-
(1972)
Statistical Mechanics
-
-
-
79
-
-
33749842307
-
-
V. Dmitrašinović, J.R. Shepard, J.A. McNeil, University of Colorado preprint, 1994 (hep-th 9406151)
-
V. Dmitrašinović, J.R. Shepard, J.A. McNeil, University of Colorado preprint, 1994 (hep-th 9406151)
-
-
-
-
81
-
-
0002045930
-
-
P. Cea: Phys. Lett. B165, 197 (1985)
-
(1985)
Phys. Lett.
, vol.B165
, pp. 197
-
-
Cea, P.1
-
86
-
-
36149023636
-
-
especially Sec. 2
-
J. S. Schwinger: Phys. Rev. 74, 1439 (1948), especially Sec. 2;
-
(1948)
Phys. Rev.
, vol.74
, pp. 1439
-
-
Schwinger, J.S.1
-
88
-
-
33749852405
-
-
note
-
2 is sufficiently large and positive
-
-
-
-
90
-
-
33749821733
-
-
note
-
0
-
-
-
-
92
-
-
33749848926
-
-
private communication
-
The puzzles found by Stancu in the second paper of Ref. [26] are resolved by the wavefunction-renormalization condition of Ref. [19]. The mass relation is only slightly modified from the Gaussian-approximation result. (J. F. Reed, private communication)
-
-
-
Reed, J.F.1
-
93
-
-
33749839921
-
-
note
-
Actually, for non-zero gauge coupling the theory is presumably no longer "trivial," so this "exact" formula should only be truly exact at the two ends; i.e., when y → 0
-
-
-
|