On Discourse and Dirty Nappies: Gender, the Division of Household Labour and the Social Psychology of Distributive Justice

Theory & Psychology

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 167-189

  Dixon, John ^a   Wetherell, Margaret ^b  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

discursive psychology; distributive justice; domestic labour; gender

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442548764     PISSN: 09593543     EISSN: 14617447     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0959354304042015     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Ahlander, N.R., & Bahr, K.S. (1995). Beyond drudgery, power and equity: Towards an expanded discourse on the moral dimensions of housework in families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 54–68.
2. Antaki, C., Condor, S., & Levine, M. (1996). Social identities in talk: Speakers’ own orientations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 473–492.
3. Baxter, J. (1997). Gender equality and participation in housework: A cross-national perspective. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 28, 220–247.
4. Baxter, J. (2000). The joys and justice of housework. Sociology, 34, 609–631.
5. Baxter, J., & Western, M. (1998). Satisfaction with housework: Examining the paradox. Sociology, 32, 101–120.
6. Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Billig, M. (1991). Consistency and group ideology: Towards a rhetorical approach to the study of justice. In R. Vermunt & H. Steensma (Eds.), Social justice in human relations (Vol. 1, pp. 169–194). New York: Plenum.
8. Billig, M. (1997). Discursive, rhetorical and ideological messages. In C. McGarty & S. Haslam (Eds.), The message of social psychology (pp. 36–53). Oxford: Blackwell.
9. Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D., & Radley, A.R. (1988). Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology of everyday thinking. London: Sage.
10. Blair, S.L., & Johnson, M.P. (1992). Wives’ perceptions of the fairness of the division of household labor: The intersection of housework and ideology. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 570–581.
11. Bobocel, D.R., Agar, S.E., Meyer, J.P., & Irving, P.G. (1998). Managerial accounts and fairness perceptions in conflict resolution: Differentiating the effects of minimizing responsibility and providing justification. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 20, 133–143.
12. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Simon & Schuster.
13. Buunk, B.P., & van Yeperen, N.W. (1991). Referential comparisons, relational comparisons and exchange orientation: Their relationship to marital satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 709–717.
14. Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modelling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1208–1233.
15. Cook, K.S., & Hegtvedt, K.A. (1983). Distributive justice, equity and equality. American Sociological Review, 9, 217–241.
16. Dempsey, K.C. (1997). Attempting to explain women’s perceptions of the fairness of the division of housework. Journal of Family Studies, 5, 2–24.
17. Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social-psychological perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18. Doucet, A. (1995). Gender equality and gender differences in household work and parenting. Women’s Studies International Forum, 18, 271–284.
19. Edwards, D. (1991). Categories are for talking: On the cognitive and discursive bases of categorization. Theory & Psychology, 1, 515–542.
20. Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.
21. Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.
22. Ferree, M.M. (1991). The gender division of labor in two-earner families. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 158–180.
23. Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality (Vol. 1). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
24. Gager, C. (1998). The role of valued outcomes, justifications and comparison referents in perceptions of fairness among dual-earner couples. Journal of Family Issues, 19, 622–648.
25. Gergen, K.J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40, 266–275.
26. Gergen, K.J. (1997). The place of the psyche in a constructed world. Theory & Psychology, 7, 723–746.
27. Gershuny, J., & Robinson, J.P. (1988). Historical changes in the household division of labor. Demography, 25, 537–552.
28. Hakim, C. (1996). The sexual division of labour and women’s heterogeneity. British Journal of Sociology, 47, 178–188.
29. Harr¥e, R., & Gillett, G. (1994). The discursive mind. London: Sage.
30. Harr¥e, R., & Stearns, P. (Eds.). (1995). Discursive psychology in practice. London: Sage.
31. Harman, G. (1983). Justice and moral bargaining. Social Philosophy and Policy, 1, 114–131.
32. Hawkins, A.J., Marshall, C.M. & Allen, S.M. (1998). The Orientation toward Domestic Labor Questionnaire: Exploring dual-earner wives’ sense of fairness about family work. Journal of Family Psychology, 12, 244–258.
33. Hawkins, A.J., Marshall, C.M., & Meiners, K.M. (1996). Exploring wives’ sense of fairness about family work–An initial test of the distributive justice framework. Journal of Family Issues, 16, 693–721.
34. Hochshild, A. (1989). The second shift. New York: Avon.
35. Kappen, D.M., & Branscombe, N.R. (2001). The effect of reasons given for ineligibility on perceived gender discrimination and feelings of injustice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 295–313.
36. Kluwer, E.S., Heesink, J.A., & van de Vliert, E. (2002). The division of labor across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64, 930–943.
37. Knudson-Martin, C., & Mahoney, A.R. (1998). Language and processes in the construction of equality in new marriages. Family Relations, 47, 81–91.
38. Kynaston, C. (1996). The everyday exploitation of women: Housework and the patriarchal mode of production. Women’s Studies International Forum, 19, 221–237.
39. Lennon, M.C., & Rosenfeld, R. (1994). Relative fairness and the division of housework: The importance of options. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 506–531.
40. Major, B. (1987). Gender, justice and the psychology of entitlement. In P. Shaver & C. Hendrick (Eds.), Sex and gender (pp. 124–138). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41. Major, B. (1993). Gender, entitlement and the distribution of family labour. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 141–159.
42. Major, B. (1994). From social inequality to personal entitlement: The role of social comparisons, legitimacy appraisals and group membership. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 293–355). New York: Academic Press.
43. Mikula, G., Freudenthaler, H.H., Brennacher-Kroell, S., & Brunshko, B. (1997). Division of labour in student households: Gender inequality, perceived injustice and satisfaction. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 19, 275–289.
44. Pomerantz, A.M. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A new way of legitimating claims. Human Studies, 9, 219–230.
45. Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage.
46. Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology. London: Sage.
47. Pyke, K., & Coltrane, S. (1996). Entitlement, obligation and gratitude in family work. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 60–82.
48. Reichle, B. (1996). From is to ought and the kitchen sink: On the justice of distributions in close relationships. In L. Montada & M.J. Lerner (Eds.), Current societal concerns about justice (pp. 103–135). New York: Plenum.
49. Riley, S. (2002). Constructions of equality and discrimination in professional men’s talk. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 443–461.
50. Sampson, E.E. (1981). Social change and the contexts of justice motivation. In M.J. Lerner & S.C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive and social behavior (pp. 97–124). London: Plenum.
51. Sanchez, L. (1994). Gender, labor allocations, and the psychology of entitlement within the home. Social Forces, 73, 533–553.
52. Sanchez, L., & Kane, E.W. (1996). Women’s and men’s constructions of perceptions of the fairness of housework fairness. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 358–387.
53. Shotter, J. (1993). Conversational realities: Constructing social life through language. London: Sage.
54. South, S.J., & Spitze, G. (1994). Housework in marital and non-marital households. American Sociological Review, 59, 327–347.
55. Speer, S.A., & Potter, J. (2000). The management of heterosexist talk: Conversational resources and prejudiced claims. Discourse & Society, 11, 543–572.
56. Sullivan, O. (2000). The division of domestic labour: Twenty years of change? Sociology, 34, 437–456.
57. Thompson, L. (1991). Family work: Women’s sense of fairness. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 181–196.
58. Thompson, L., & Walker, A. (1989). Gender in families: Women and men in marriage, work and parenthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 845–871.
59. Warde, A., & Hetherington, K. (1993). A changing domestic division of labour? Issues of measurement and interpretation. Work, Employment and Society, 7, 23–45.
60. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (1981). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125–151.
61. Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society, 9, 387–412.
62. Wetherell, M., & Edley, N. (1998). Negotiating hegemonic masculinity: Imaginary positions and psycho-discursive practices. Feminism & Psychology, 9, 335–356.
63. Wetherell, M., & Potter, J. (1992). Mapping the language of racism: Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
64. Wetherell, M., Stiven, H., & Potter, J. (1987). Unequal egalitarianism: A preliminary study of discourses concerning gender and employment opportunities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 59–71.
65. Wetherell, M., Taylor, S., & Yates, S.J. (Eds.). (2001) Discourse theory and practice: A reader. London: Sage.