Similarity of supply and demand shocks in the European Union and acceding countries (implications for the Czech Republic and Slovakia);Podobnosť ponukových a dopytových šokov v Európskej Únii a v pristupujúcich krajinách (implikácie pre Českú Republiku a Slovensko)

Politicka Ekonomie

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 171-182

  Fidrmuc, Jarko ^a,b,c   Hagara, Eduard ^b  

^a Akademické centrum výskumu autizmu   (Slovakia)

^b Physics and Informatics   (Slovakia)

^c OESTERREICHISCHE NATIONALBANK   (Austria)

Author keywords

EU enlargement; Optimum currency area; Structural VAR

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442534013     PISSN: 00323233     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.455     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bayoumi, T., Eichengreen, B.: Shocking Aspects of European Monetary Integration. In: Torres, F., Giavazzi, F.: Adjustment and Growth in the European Monetary Union. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 1993.
2. Blanchard, O., Quah, D.: The Dynamic Effects of Aggregate Demand and Supply Disturbances. American Economic Review, 1989, č. 4, s. 655-673.
3. Boone, L., Maurel, M.: An Optimal Currency Area Perspective of the EU Enlargement to the CIEECs. London, CEPR 1999 (Discussion Paper No. 2018).
4. Brada, J. C., Kutan, A. M.: The Convergence of Monetary Policy between Candidate Countries and the European Union. Economic Systems, 2001, č. 3, s. 215-231.
5. Cincibuch, M., Vávra, D.: Toward the European Monetary Union: A Need for Exchange Rate Flexibility? Eastern European Economics, 2001, č. 6, s. 23-64.
6. Čech, Z., Komárek, L., Horváth, R.: Optimum Currency Area Indices - How Close is the Czech Republic to the Eurozone? Praha, Česká národní banka 2003 (Research Paper).
7. Dibooglu, S., Horvath, J.: Optimum Currency Areas and European Monetary Unification. Contemporary Economic Policy, 2001, č. 1, s. 37-49.
8. Fidrmuc, J., Horvath, J., Fidrmuc, J.: Stability of Monetary Unions: Lessons from the Breakup of Czechoslovakia. Journal of Comparative Economics, 1999, č. 4, s. 753-781.
9. Fidrmuc, J.: The Endogeneity of the Optimum Currency Area Criteria, Intra-Industry Trade, and EMU Enlargement. Contemporary Economic Policy, 2004, č. 1, s. 1-12.
10. Fidrmuc, J., Korhonen, I.: Similarity of Supply and Demand Shocks between the Euro Area and the CEECs. Economic Systems, 2003, č. 3, s. 313-334.
11. Frenkel, M., Nickel, Ch., Schmidt, G.: Some Shocking Aspects of EMU Enlargement. Berlin, Deutsche Bank 1999 (Research Note No. 99-4).
12. Hagara, E.: Teória optimálnej menovej oblasti: Implikácie pre rozširovanie EÚ. Bratislava, Univerzita Komenského 2003 (http://pc2.iam.fmph.uniba.sk/studium/efm/diplomovky/).
13. Horvath, J.: The Optimum Currency Area Theory: A Review. Budapest, Central European University 2001.
14. Kenen, P. B.: The Theory of Optimum Currency Areas: An Eclectic View. In: Mundell, R., Swoboda, W.: Monetary Problems in the International Economy. Chicago, University of Chicago Press 1969.
15. Kenen, P. B.: Currency Areas, Policy Domains, and the Institutionalization of Fixed Exchange Rates. Princeton, Princeton University 2000.
16. Korhonen, I.: Some Empirical Tests on the Integration of Economic Activity between the Euro Area and the Accession Countries: A Note. Economics of Transition, 2003, č. 1, s. 1-20.
17. Maurel, M.: On the Way of EMU Enlargement Towards CEECs: What is the Appropriate Exchange Rate Regime? London, CEPR 2002 (Discussion Paper No. 3409).
18. McKinnon, R.: Optimum Currency Area. American Economic Review, 1963, s. 717-725.
19. McKinnon, R.: Mundell, the Euro and the World Dollar Standard. Journal of Policy Modeling, 2000, č. 3, s. 311-324.
20. Mundell, R.: A Theory of Optimum Currency Area. American Economic Review, 1961, s. 657-665.
21. Rose, A. K.: One Money, One Market: Estimating the Effect of Common Currencies on Trade. Economic Policy: A European Forum, 2000, s. 7-45.
22. Whitt, J. A. Jr.: European Monetary Union: Evidence from Structural VARs. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, 1995 (Working Paper 1995-1).