The European union at the ballot box? European integration and voting behavior in the new member states

Comparative Political Studies

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 590-610

  Tillman, Erik R ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

EU voting; European integration; Issue voting; Voting behavior

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442509230     PISSN: 00104140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0010414004263661     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Alvarez, R. Michael, & Nagler, Jonathan. (1998). When politics and models collide: Estimating models of multiparty elections. American Journal of Political Science, 42(1), 55-96.
2. Anderson, Christopher J. (1998). When in doubt, use proxies: Attitudes toward domestic politics and support for European integration. Comparative Political Studies, 31, 569-601.
3. Anderson, Christopher J., & Kaltenthaler, Karl C. (1996). The dynamics of public support toward European integration, 1973-1993. European Journal of International Relations, 2(1), 175-199.
4. Carrubba, Clifford J. (2001). The electoral connection in European Union politics. Journal of Politics, 63(1), 141-158.
5. Eichenberg, Richard C., & Dalton, Russell J. (1993). Europeans and the European Community: The dynamics of public support for European integration. International Organization, 47(4), 507-534.
6. Evans, Geoffrey. (1998). Euroscepticism and conservative electoral support: How an asset became a liability. British Journal of Political Science, 28, 573-590.
7. Gabel, Matthew. (1998a). Interests and integration: Market liberalization, public opinion, and the European Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
8. Gabel, Matthew. (1998b). Public support for European integration: An empirical test of five theories. Journal of Politics, 60(2), 333-354.
9. Gabel, Matthew. (2000). European integration, voters, and national politics. West European Politics, 23(4), 52-72.
10. Gabel, Matthew, & Palmer, Harvey D. (1995). Understanding variation in public support for European integration. European Journal of Political Research, 27(1), 3-19.
11. Gabel, Matthew, & Whitten, Guy D. (1997). Economic conditions, economic perceptions, and public support for European integration. Political Behavior, 19(1), 81-96.
12. Holmberg, Sören, & Gilljam, Mikael. (1994). Swedish Election Study [Computer file]. Göteborg, Sweden: Göteborg University, Department of Political Science.
13. Huber, John, & Inglehart, Ronald. (1995). Expert interpretations of party space and party locations in 42 societies. Party Politics, 1(1), 73-111.
14. Janssen, Joseph I. H. (1991). Postmaterialism, cognitive mobilization, and public support for European integration. British Journal of Political Science, 21, 443-468.
15. Jenssen, Anders Todal, Pesonen, Pertti, & Gilljam, Mikael. (1998). To join ornottojoin: Three Nordic referendums on membership in the European Union. Boston: Scandinavian University Press.
16. Johansson, Karl M., & Raunio, Tapio. (2001). Partisan responses to Europe: Comparing Finnish and Swedish political parties. European Journal of Political Research, 39(3), 225-249.
17. Kaltenthaler, Karl C., & Anderson, Christopher J. (2001). Europeans and their money: Explaining public support for the common European currency. European Journal of Political Research, 40(2), 139-170.
18. Lindberg, Leon, & Scheingold, Stuart. (1970). Europe's would-be polity: Patterns of change in the European Community. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19. Marks, Gary, & Wilson, Carole J. (2000). The past in the present: A cleavage theory of party response to European integration. British Journal of Political Science, 30,433-459.
20. McLaren, Lauren M. (2002). Public support for the European Union: Cost/Benefit analysis or perceived cultural threat? Journal of Politics, 64(2), 551-566.
21. Melich, Anna. (1999). Eurobarometer 46.0: Personal health, energy, development aid, and the common European currency, October-November 1996 [Computer file]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
22. Raunio, Tapio. (1999). Facing the European challenge: Finnish parties adjust to the integration process. West European Politics, 22(1), 138-159.
23. Ray, Leonard. (1999a). Conversion, acquiescence, or delusion: The contingent nature of the party-voter connection. Political Behavior, 27(4), 325-347.
24. Ray, Leonard. (1999b). Measuring party orientations towards European integration: Results from an expert survey. European Journal of Political Research, 36, 283-306.
25. Scheve, Kenneth. (2000). Casting votes in the global economy: Public opinion and voting behavior in open economies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Department of Political Science.
26. Taggart, Paul. (1998). A touchstone of dissent: Euroscepticism in contemporary Western European party systems. European Journal of Political Research, 33, 363-388.
27. van der Eijk, Cees, & Franklin, Mark. (1996). Choosing Europe? The European electorate and national politics in the face of union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
28. van der Eijk, Cees, & Franklin, Mark N. (2001, August-September). The sleeping giant: Potential for contestation on European matters at national elections in Europe. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.
29. Whitten, Guy D., & Palmer, Harvey D. (1996). Heightening comparativists' concern for model choice: Voting behavior in Great Britain and the Netherlands. American Journal of Political Science, 40(1), 231-260.