Hilbert series, Howe duality and branching for classical groups

Annals of Mathematics

Volumn 159, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 337-375

  Enright, Thomas J ^a   Willenbring, Jeb F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442499621     PISSN: 0003486X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4007/annals.2004.159.337     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. [A] J. ADAMS, Unitary highest weight modules, Adv. in Math. 63 (1987), 113-137.
2. [BGG] I. N. BERNŠTEIN, I. M. GEL'FAND, and S. I. GEL'FAND, Structure of representations that are generated by vectors of higher weight, Funckcional Anal. i Priložen 5 (1971), 1-9.
3. [BK] W. BORHO and H. KRAFT, Über die Gelfand-Kirillov-Dimension, Math. Ann. 220 (1976), 1-24.
4. [C] D. COLLINGWOOD, The n-cohomology of Harish-Chandra modules: generalizing a theorem of Kostant, Math. Ann. 272 (1985), 161-187.
5. [DES] M. G. DAVIDSON, T. J. ENRIGHT, and R. J. STANKE, Differential Operators and Highest Weight Representations, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 94, A. M. S., Providence, RI, 1991.
6. [E] T. J. ENRIGHT, Analogues of Kostant's u-cohomology formulas for unitary highest weight modules, J. Reine Angew. Math. 392 (1988), 27-36.
7. [EHW] T. J. ENRIGHT, R. HOWE, and N. R. WALLACH, A classification of unitary highest weight modules, Representation Theory of Reductive Groups (Park City, Utah, 1982) Progr. Math. 40, 97-143, Birkhäuser Boston, 1983.
8. [EJ] T. J. ENRIGHT and A. JOSEPH, An intrinsic analysis of unitarizable highest weight modules, Math. Ann. 288 (1990), 571-594.
9. [ES] T. J. ENRIGHT and B. SHELTON, Categories of Highest Weight Modules: Applications to Classical Hermitian Symmetric Pairs, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 67, A. M. S., Providence, RI, 1987.
10. [ES2] _, Highest weight modules for Hermitian symmetric pairs of exceptional type, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 106 (1989), 807-819.
11. [EW] T. J. ENRIGHT and J. F. WILLENBRING, Hilbert series, Howe duality and branching rules, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100 (2003), 434-437.
12. [G] F. GAVARINI, A Brauer algebra-theoretic proof of Littlewood's restriction rules, J. Algebra 212 (1999), 240-271.
13. [GP] F. GAVARINI and P. PAPI, Representations of the Brauer algebra and Littlewood's restriction rules, J. Algebra 194 (1997), 275-298.
14. [GW] R. GOODMAN and N. WALLACH, Representations and Invariants of the Classical Groups, Encyc. Math. and its Appl. 68, 406-463, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1998.
15. [H] R. HOWE, Remarks on classical invariant theory. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 313 (1989), 539-570.
16. [J] H. P. JAKOBSEN, Hermitian symmetric spaces and their unitary highest weight modules, J. Funct. Anal. 52 (1983), 385-412.
17. [KV] M. KASHIWARA and M. VERGNE, On the Segal-Shale-Weil representations and harmonic polynomials, Invent. Math. 44 (1978), 1-47.
18. [L] J. LEPOWSKY, A generalization of the Bernstein-Gelfand-Gelfand resolution, J. Algebra 49 (1977), 496-511.
19. [Lit1] D. E. LITTLEWOOD, The Theory of Group Characters and Matrix Representations of Groups, Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1940.
20. [Lit2] _, On invariant theory under restricted groups, Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A 239 (1944), 387-417.
21. [N] M. J. NEWELL, Modification rules for the orthogonal and symplectic groups, Proc. Roy. Irish Acad. Sect. A 54 (1951), 153-163.
22. [NOTYK] K. NISHIYAMA, H. OCHIAI, K. TANIGUCHI, H. YAMASHITA, and S. KATO, Nilpotent orbits, associated cycles and Whittaker models for highest weight representations, Astérisque 273 (2001), 1-163.
23. [S] S. SUNDARAM, Tableaux in the representation theory of the classical Lie Groups, Invariant Theory and Tableaux (Minneapolis, MN, 1988) IMA Vol. Math. Appl. 19, 191-225, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990.
24. [W] N. R. WALLACH, The analytic continuation of the discrete series. I, II, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 251 (1979), 1-17, 19-37.
25. [V] D. A. VOGAN, Gelfand-Kirillov dimension for Harish-Chandra modules, Invent. Math. 48 (1978), 75-98.