Contrast-enhanced MRA in the workup of peripheral arterial occlusive disease

Imaging Decisions MRI

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 20-28

  Leiner, Tim ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Chronic critical ischaemia; Intermittent claudication; Magnetic resonance angiography; Peripheral arterial occlusive disease

Indexed keywords

GADOBUTROL;

ADULT; AGED; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE SEVERITY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 2442499286     PISSN: 14333317     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1617-0830.2004.00015.x     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Stoffers HE, Kester AD, Kaiser V, Rinkens PE, Knottnerus JA. Diagnostic value of signs and symptoms associated with peripheral arterial occlusive disease seen in general practice: a multivariable approach. Med Decis Making 1997; 17: 61-70.
2. Becker F. Exploration of arterial function with noninvasive techniques. Results in chronic arterial occlusive disease of the lower limbs according to Leriche and Fontaine classification. Int Angiol 1985; 4: 311-322.
3. Rutherford RB, Baker JD, Ernst C et al. Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: revised version. J Vasc Surg 1997; 26: 517-538.
4. Dormandy JA, Rutherford RB. Management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). TASC Working Group. Trans Atlantic Inter-Society Concensus (TASC). J Vasc Surg 2000; 31: S1-S296.
5. Dalman RL, Taylor LM Jr. Basic data related to infrainguinal revascularization procedures. Ann Vasc Surg 1990; 4: 309-312.
6. Kalra M, Gloviczki P, Bower TC et al. Limb salvage after successful pedal bypass grafting is associated with improved long-term survival. J Vasc Surg 2001; 33: 6-16.
7. Beard JD, Scott DJ, Evans JM, Skidmore R, Horrocks M. Pulse-generated runoff: a new method of determining calf vessel patency. Br J Surg 1988; 75: 361-363.
8. Owen RS, Carpenter JP, Baum RA, Perloff LJ, Cope C. Magnetic resonance imaging of angiographically occult runoff vessels in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 1577-1581.
9. Wilson YG, George JK, Wilkins DC, Ashley S. Duplex assessment of run-off before femorocrural reconstruction. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 1360-1363.
10. Ho KY, Leiner T, de Haan MW, Kessels AG, Kitslaar PJ, van Engelshoven JM. Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: evaluation with moving-bed infusion-tracking MR angiography. Radiology 1998; 206: 683-692.
11. Meaney JF, Ridgway JP, Chakraverty S et al. Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta and lower extremity arteries: preliminary experience. Radiology 1999; 211: 59-67.
12. Ruehm SG, Hany TF, Pfammatter T, Schneider E, Ladd M, Debatin JF. Pelvic and lower extremity arterial imaging: diagnostic performance of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174: 1127-1135.
13. Reid SK, Pagan-Marin HR, Menzoian JO, Woodson J, Yucel EK. Contrast-enhanced moving-table MR angiography: prospective comparison to catheter arteriography for treatment planning in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001; 12: 45-53.
14. Leiner T, Ho KY, Nelemans PJ, de Haan MW, van Engelshoven JM. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced moving-bed infusion-tracking (MoBI-track) peripheral MR angiography with flexible choice of imaging parameters for each field of view. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 11: 368-377.
15. Morasch MD, Collins J, Pereles FS et al. Lower extremity stepping-table magnetic resonance angiography with multilevel contrast timing and segmented contrast infusion. J Vasc Surg 2003; 37: 62-71.
16. Wang Y, Winchester PA, Khilnani NM et al. Contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography from the abdominal aorta to the pedal arteries: combined dynamic two-dimensional and bolus-chase three-dimensional acquisitions. Invest Radiol 2001; 36: 170-177.
17. Westenberg JJ, van der Geest RJ, Wasser MN et al. Vessel diameter measurements in gadolinium contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MRA of peripheral arteries. Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 18: 13-22.
18. Ho KY, Leiner T, de Haan MW, van Engelshoven JM. Peripheral MR angiography. Eur Radiol 1999; 9: 1765-1774.
19. Schoenberg SO, Londy FJ, Licato P, Williams DM, Wakefield T, Chenevert TL. Multiphase-multistep gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and runoff vessels. Invest Radiol 2001; 36: 283-291.
20. Foo TK, Saranathan M, Prince MR, Chenevert TL. Automated detection of bolus arrival and initiation of data acquisition in fast, three-dimensional, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1997; 203: 275-280.
21. Meaney JF. Magnetic resonance angiography of the peripheral arteries: current status. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 836-852.
22. Luccichenti G, Cademartiri F, Ugolotti U, Marchesi G, Pavone P. Magnetic resonance angiography with elliptical ordering and fluoroscopic triggering of the renal arteries. Radiol Med (Torino) 2003; 105: 42-47.
23. Leiner T, de Weert TT, Nijenhuis RJ et al. Need for background suppression in contrast-enhanced peripheral magnetic resonance angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 14: 724-733.
24. Ruehm SG, Nanz D, Baumann A, Schmid M, Debatin JF. 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the run-off vessels: value of image subtraction. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 13: 402-411.
25. Goyen M, Ruehm SG, Barkhausen J et al. Improved multi-station peripheral MR angiography with a dedicated vascular coil. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 13: 475-480.
26. Fellner FA, Requardt M, Lang W, Fellner C, Bautz W, Cavallaro A. Peripheral vessels: MR angiography with dedicated phased-array coil with large-field-of-view adapter feasibility study. Radiology 2003; 228: 284-289.
27. Leiner T, Nijenhuis RJ, Maki JH, Lemaire E, Hoogeveen R, Engelshoven JM van. Use of a three-station phased-array coil to improve peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. In: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM), Glasgow, 2001; 69.
28. Hentsch A, Aschauer MA, Balzer JO et al. Gadobutrol-enhanced moving-table magnetic resonance angiography in patients with peripheral vascular disease: a prospective, multi-centre blinded comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 2103-2114.
29. Knopp MV, Tengg-Kobligk H, Floemer F, Schoenberg SO. Contrast agents for MRA: future directions. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10: 314-316.
30. Prince MR, Chabra SG, Watts R et al. Contrast material travel times in patients undergoing peripheral MR angiography. Radiology 2002; 224: 55-61.
31. Wilman AH, Riederer SJ. Improved centric phase encoding orders for three-dimensional magnetization-prepared MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36: 384-392.
32. Willinek WA, Gieseke J, Conrad R et al. Randomly segmented central k-space ordering in high-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supraaortic arteries: initial experience. Radiology 2002; 225: 583-588.
33. Swan JS, Carroll TJ, Kennell TW et al. Time-resolved three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the peripheral vessels. Radiology 2002; 225: 43-52.
34. Foo TK, Ho VB, Hood MN, Marcos HB, Hess SL, Choyke PL. High-spatial-resolution multistation MR imaging of lower-extremity peripheral vasculature with segmented volume acquisition: feasibility study. Radiology 2001; 219: 835-841.
35. Weiger M, Pruessmann KP, Kassner A et al. Contrast-enhanced 3D MRA using SENSE. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12: 671-677.
36. de Vries M, van Engelshoven JM, Leiner T. Peripheral MR angiography using SENSE in multiple stations. In: XIVth International Workshop on Magnetic Resonance Angiography, Essen, Germany, 2002; 22.
37. Hoogeveen RM, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA. Limits to the accuracy of vessel diameter measurement in MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8: 1228-1235.
38. Hany TF, Schmidt M, Davis CP, Gohde SC, Debatin JF. Diagnostic impact of four postprocessing techniques in evaluating contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170: 907-912.
39. Nelemans PJ, Leiner T, de Vet HC, van Engelshoven JM. Peripheral arterial disease: meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of MR angiography. Radiology 2000; 217: 105-114.
40. Douek PC, Revel D, Chazel S, Falise B, Villard J, Amiel M. Fast MR angiography of the aortoiliac arteries and arteries of the lower extremity: value of bolus-enhanced, whole-volume subtraction technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165: 431-437.
41. Rofsky NM, Johnson G, Adelman MA, Rosen RJ, Krinsky GA, Weinreb JC. Peripheral vascular disease evaluated with reduced-dose gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1997; 205: 163-169.
42. Koelemay MJ, Lijmer JG, Stoker J, Legemate DA, Bossuyt PM. Magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of lower extremity arterial disease: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2001; 285: 1338-1345.
43. Ubbink DT, Fidler M, Legemate DA. Interobserver variability in aortoiliac and femoropopliteal duplex scanning. J Vasc Surg 2001; 33: 540-545.
44. Visser K, Hunink MG. Peripheral arterial disease: gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography versus color-guided duplex US - a meta-analysis. Radiology 2000; 216: 67-77.
45. Wikstrom J, Holmberg A, Johansson L et al. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and duplex of the iliac arteries compared with intra-arterial pressure gradient measurements. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2000; 19: 516-523.
46. Lundin P, Svensson A, Henriksen E et al. Imaging of aortoiliac arterial disease. Duplex ultrasound and MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography. Acta Radiol 2000; 41: 125-132.
47. Leiner T, Kessels AG, Tordoir JH, Kitslaar P, Ho KY, van Engelshoven JM. Prospective comparison of the accuracy of color duplex ultrasonography and CE-MRA for the diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease. Radiology 2002; 225: 401.
48. Leiner T, Tordoir JH, Kessels AG et al. Comparison of treatment plans for peripheral arterial disease made with multi-station contrast medium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasound scanning. J Vasc Surg 2003; 37: 1255-1262.
49. Visser K, Bosch JL, Leiner T, van Engelshoven JM, Passchier J, Hunink MG. Patients' preferences for MR angiography and duplex US in the work-up of peripheral arterial disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2003; 26: 537-543.
50. Lawler LP, Fishman EK. Multidetector row computed tomography of the aorta and peripheral arteries. Cardiol Clin 2003; 21: 607-629.
51. Ofer A, Nitecki SS, Linn S et al. Multidetector CT angiography of peripheral vascular disease: a prospective comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 719-724.
52. Willmann JK, Mayer D, Banyai M et al. Evaluation of peripheral arterial bypass grafts with multi-detector row CT angiography: comparison with duplex US and digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 2003; 229: 465-474.