Semantic enrichment for improving systems interoperability

Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing

Volumn 2, Issue , 2004, Pages 1634-1641

  Su, Xiaomeng ^a   Hakkarainen, Sari ^a   Brasethvik, Terje ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Design; Experiment

Indexed keywords

DATABASE SYSTEMS; FUNCTIONS; HEURISTIC METHODS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION SERVICES; INTEROPERABILITY; MAPPING; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; SECURITY OF DATA;

DATA SHARING; DOMAIN ONTOLOGIES; PRODUCT CATALOGUES; SEMANTIC ENRICHMENT;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 2442493187     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/967900.968227     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. K. Aas and L. Eikvil. Text categorisation: A survey. Technical report, Norwegian Computing Center, Oslo, 1999.
2. R. Agrawal and R. Srikant. On integrating catalogs. In Proceeding of the WWW-11, Hong Kong, 2001.
3. S. Bergamaschi, S. Castano, and M. Vincini. Semantic integration of semistructured and structured data sources. SIGMOD Record, 28(1):54-59, 1999.
4. T. Berners-Lee. The semantic web. Scientific american, 284(5):35-43, 2001.
5. T. Brasethvik and J. A. Gulla. Natural language analysis for semantic document modeling. Data & knowledge Engineering, 38(1):45-62, 2001.
6. A. Doan, J. Madhavan, P. Domingos, and A. Halevy. Learning to map between ontologies on the semantic web. In Proceedings of WWW-2002, 11th International WWW Conference., Hawaii, 2002.
7. DublinCore. http://www.dublincore.org.
8. D. Fensel, Y. Ding, B. Omelayenko, E. Schulten, G. Botquin, M. Brown, and A. Flett. Product data integration in b2b e-commerce. IEEE Intelligent Systems (Special Issue on Intelligent E-Business), 16(4):54-59, 2001.
9. T. R. Gruber. Translation approach to portable ontology specification. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2):199-220, 1993.
10. S. Hakkarainen. Dynamic aspect and semantic enrichment in schema comparison. PhD thesis, Stockholm University, 1999.
11. J. Heflin, J. Hendler, and S. Luke. Coping with changing ontologies in a distributed environment. In Proceeding of the AAAI workshop on ontology management, 1999.
12. B. Hofreiter and C. Huemer. Towards syntax-independent b2b. ERCIM news, October 2002.
13. H. Kaada. Linguistic workbench for document analysis and text data mining. Master's thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2002.
14. KITH. Competence senter for it in public health service. http://www.kith.no.
15. J. Krogstie, O. I. Lindland, and G. Sindre. Defining quality aspects for conceptual models. In Proceedings of the IFIP International Working Conference on Information System Concepts, pages 216-231, 1995.
16. Y. Labrou and T. Finin. Yahoo! as an ontology- using yahoo! categories to describe documents. In Proceeding of the 8th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 180-187, 1999.
17. O. I. Lindland, G. Sindre, and A. Solvberg. Understanding quality in conceptual modeling. IEEE Software, 11(2):42-49, 1994.
18. J. Madhavan, P. Bernstein, and E. Rahm. Generic schema matching using cupid. In Proceeding of Very Large Database Conference (VLDB) 2001, 2001.
19. D. McGuinness, R. Fikes, J. Rice, and S. Wilder. An environment for merging and testing large ontologies. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Colorado, USA, 2000.
20. E. Mena, A. Illarramendi, V. Kashyap, and A. P. Sheth. Observer: An approach for query processing in global infomation systems based on interoperation across pre-exist ontologies. International journal on distributed and parallel databases, 8(2):223-271, April 2000.
21. N. F. Noy and M. A. Musen. Prompt: Algorithm and tool for automated ontology merging and alignment. In Proceeding of American Association for Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) 2000, 2000.
22. OWL. Web ontology language reference, http://www.w3.org/tr/owl-ref/.
23. L. Palopoli, G. Terracina, and D. Ursino. The system dike: Towards the semi-automatic synthesis of cooperative information systems and data warehouses. In ADBIS-DASFAA Symposium 2000, pages 108-117. Matfyz Press, 2000.
24. E. Rahm and P. A. Bernstein. A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching. The VLDB Journal, 10:334-350, 2001.
25. RML. Referent modelling language http://www.idi.ntnu.no/ ppp.
26. G. Salton and M. J. McGill. An Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill, 1983.
27. A. Solvberg. Data and what they refer to. In P. P. Chen, editor, Concept Modeling: Historical Perspectives and Future Trends. Springer Verlag, 1998.
28. G. Stumme and A. Maedche. Fca-merge: Bottom-up merging of ontologies. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence IJCAI01., Seattle, USA, 2001.
29. X. Su and L. Ilebrekke. A comparative study of ontology languages and tools. In Proceeding of the Seventh IFIP-WG8.1 International Workshop on Evaluating of Modeling Methods in Systems Analysis and Design (EMMSAD'02), 2002.
30. X. Su, M. Matskin, and J. Rao. Implementing explanation ontology for agent system. In Proceeding of the 2003 IEEE/WIG International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI 2003). IEEE Computer Society Press, 2003.
31. A. Valente, T. Russ, R. MacGrecor, and W. Swartout. Building and (re)using an ontology for air campaign planning. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 14(1):27-36, 1999.
32. M. Wilson and B. Matthews. Migrating thesauri to the semantic web. ERCIM news, october 2002.