Consumerism are patients of Asian medicine active consumers?;Sind patienten asiatischer medizin aktive konsumenten?

Forschende Komplementarmedizin und Klassische Naturheilkunde

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 83-92

  Frank, R ^a   Stollberg, G ^a  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Acupuncture; Ayurveda; Consumerism

Indexed keywords

AYURVEDIC DRUG;

ACUPUNCTURE; ASIA; CONCEPT FORMATION; CONSUMER; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICINE; PATIENT INFORMATION; PHYSICIAN; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW;

ACUPUNCTURE; ADULT; AGED; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; MALE; MEDICINE, AYURVEDIC; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS;

EID: 2442481840     PISSN: 14247364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000078229     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Fisher P, Ward A: Complementary medicine in Europe. BMJ 1994;309:107-111.
2. Eisenberg D, Kessler R, Foster C, Norlock F, Calkins D, Delbanco T: Unconventional medicine in the United States. N Engl J Med 1993;328:246-252.
3. Stollberg G: Medizinsoziologie. Bielefeld, transcript, 2001.
4. Haltenhof H, Hesse B, Bühler KE: Beurteilung und Verbreitung komplementärmedizinischer Verfahren - eine Befragung von 793 Ärzten in Praxis und Klinik. Gesundheitswesen 1995;57:192-195.
5. Tovey P: Contingent legitimacy: UK alternative practitioners and inter-sectorial acceptance. Soc Sci Med 1997;45:1129-1133.
6. Verhoef MJ, Sutherland LR: General practitioners' assessment of and interest in alternative treatment in Canada. Soc Sci Med 1995;41:511-515.
7. Hentschel C, Kohnen R, Hauser G, Lindner M, Ernst E, Hahn EG: Entscheidung zur Komplementärmedizin: Sachorientiert oder irrational? Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1996;121:1553-1560.
8. Stollberg G: Patients and homoeopathy: An overview of sociological literature; in Dinges M (ed): Patients in the History of Homoeopathy. Sheffield, EAHMH, 2002, pp 317-329.
9. Kelner M, Wellman B: Health care and consumer choice: Medical and alternative therapies. Soc Sci Med 1997;45:203-212.
10. Sharma U: Complementary Medicine Today. London, Routledge, 1992.
11. Sirois FM, Gick ML: An investigation of the health beliefs and motivations of complementary medicine clients. Soc Sci Med 2002;55:1025-1037.
12. Blais R, Maiga A, Aboubacar A: How different are users and non-users of alternative medicine? Can J Public Health 1997;88:159-162.
13. Sharma U: Using alternative therapies: Marginal medicine and central concerns; in Abbot P, Payne G (eds): New Directions in the Sociology of Health. London, Falmer Press, 1990.
14. Vincent C, Furnham A: Why do patients turn to complementary medicine? Br J Clin Psychol 1996;35:37-48.
15. Siapush M: Postmodern values, dissatisfaction with conventional medicine and popularity of alternative therapies. J Sociol 1998;34:58-70.
16. Astin JA: Why patients use alternative medicine. Results of a national study. J Am Med Assoc 1998;279:1548-1553.
17. Günther M, Römermann H: The homeopathic patient in general practice: Findings of a comparative poll of patients in conventional medicine and homeopathic private and health insurance scheme practices; in Dinges M (ed): Patients in the History of Homoeopathy. Sheffield, EAHMH, 2002.
18. Cant S, Sharma U: A New Medical Pluralism? Alternative Medicine, Doctors, Patients and the State. London, UCL Press, 1999
19. Douglas M: Thought Styles. Critical Essays in Good Taste. London, Sage, 1996
20. Giddens A: Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics. Cambridge, Polity Press, 1994.
21. Tuckett D, Bolton M, Olson C, Williams A: Meetings between Experts. An Approach to Sharing Ideas in Medical Consultation. London, Tavistock, 1985.
22. Schütz A: Gesammelte Aufsätze II. Den Haag, Nijhoff, 1972.
23. Payner L, Easthope G: Postmodern consumption and alternative medications. J Sociol 2001;37:157-176.
24. Gartner A, Riesman, F: Der aktive Konsument in der Dienstleistungsgesellschaft. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, 1978.
25. Logan J, Green D, Woodfield A: Healthy Competition. Sydney, Centre for Independent Societies, 1989.
26. Meredith DB: Public Health, Preventive Medicine and Social Services, ed 6. London, Arnold, 1995.
27. Wasem J, Güther B: Das Gesundheitssystem in Deutschland. Einstellungen und Erwartungen der Bevölkerung. Apotheke Krankenhaus 1998;14:111-116.
28. Wildner M, Brunner A, Weikunat R, Weinheimer H, Moretti M, Raghuvanshi VS, Aparicio ML: The patients' right to information and citizens' perspective of their information needs. Z Gesundheitswiss 2002;10:305-315.
29. Parsons T: The Social System. Glencoe, Free Press, 1951.
30. Freidson E: Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge. New York, Harper & Row, 1970.
31. Illich I: Die Nemesis der Medizin. Reinbek, Rowohlt, 1977.
32. Zola IK: Medicine as an institution of social control. Sociol Rev 1972;20:487-504.
33. Goffman E: Asylums. Garden City, Doubleday, 1961.
34. Gwyn R, Elwyn G: When is a shared decision not (quite) a shared decision? Negotiating preferences in a general practice encounter. Soc Sci Med 1999;49:437-447.
35. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T: Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: Revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med 1999;49:651-661.
36. Stevenson FA, Barry CA, Britten N, Barber N, Bradley CP: Doctor-patient communication on drugs: The evidence of shared decision making. Soc Sci Med 2000;50:829-840.
37. Mead N, Bower P: Patient-centredness: A conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Soc Sci Med 2000;51:1087-1110.
38. Marstedt G, Moebus S: Inanspruchnahme alternativer Methoden in der Medizin. Berlin, Verlag Robert Koch Institut, 2002.
39. Norheim AJ, Fønnebø V: Doctors' attitudes to acupuncture - A Norwegian study. Soc Sci Med 1994;47:519-523.
40. Frank R, Stollberg G: Conceptualising hybridisation - On the diffusion of Asian medical knowledge to Germany. Int Sociol 2004;19:71-88.
41. Mayring P: Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Weinheim, Deutscher Studien Verlag, 1988.
42. Frank R: Integrating homeopathy and biomedicine. Medical practice and knowledge production among German homeopathic physicians. Sociol Health Illness 2002;24:796-819.
43. Frank R: Globalisierung «alternativer» Medizin. Homöopathie und Ayurveda in Deutschland und Indien. Bielefeld, transcript, 2004.
44. Reddy S: Asian medicine in America. The Ayurvedic case. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Scie 2002;583:97-121.
45. Zysk KG: New Age Ayurveda or what happens to Indian medicine when it comes to America. Tradit South Asian Med 2001;6:10-26.
46. Barnes L: The psychologizing of Chinese healing practices in the United States. Cult Med Psychiatry 1998;22:413-443.
47. Hare ML: The emergence of an urban U.S. Chinese Medicine. Med Anthropol Q 1993;7:30-49.
48. Frank R: Homeopath & patient - a dyad of harmony? Soc Sci Med 2002;55:1285-1296.
49. Lupton D: Consumerism, reflexivity and the medical encounter. Soc Sci Med 1997;45:373-381.