Defining alternative national-scale socio-economic and technological futures up to 2100: SRES scenarios for the case of Finland

Boreal Environment Research

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 109-125

  Kaivo oja, Jari ^a   Luukkanen, Jyrki ^a   Wilenius, Markku ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442477680     PISSN: 12396095     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Berkhout F., Hertin J., Lorenzoni I., Jordan A., Turner R.K., O'Riordan T., Cobb D., Ledoux L., Tinch R., Hulme M., Palutikof J. & Skea J. 1999. Socio-economic scenarios for climate impact assessment, Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
2. Carter T.R., Bärlund I., Fronzek S., Kankaanpää S., Kaivooja J., Luukkanen J., Wilenius M., Tuomenvirta H., Jylhä K., Kahma K., Johansson M., Boman H., Launiainen J., Laurila T., Lindfors V., Tuovinen J.-P., Aurela M., Syri S., Forsius M. & Karvosenoja N. 2002. The FINSKEN global change scenarios. In: Käyhkö J. & Talve L. (eds.), Understanding the global system - The Finnish perspective, Finnish Global Change Research Programme FIGARE, Painosalama, Turku, pp. 27-40.
3. Expert respondents 2002. Confidential expert statements 2002 of the future of Finland in the 21st century. Finland Futures Research Centre Archives. Turku.
4. Futures Committee 2002. Government statement "Balanced Development of Finland 2105". TuVM 1/2002 vp-VN 4/2001 vp, Helsinki.
5. Gaffin S.R., Rosenzweig C.R., Xing X. & Yetman G. 2004. Downscaling and geo-spatial gridding of socio-economic projections from the IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES). Global Environmental Change [in press].
6. Hughes B.B. 1999a. International Futures: Choices in the face of uncertainty, 3rd edition Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
7. Hughes B.B. 1999b. The International Futures (IFs) modelling project. Simulation and Gaming 30: 304-326.
8. Hughes B.B. 2000. Continuity and change in world politics, 4th edition, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
9. Hughes B.B. 2002. Integrated description of model equations, April 2002, Terra2000, IST-2000-26332, Rand Europe, Leiden.
10. Human Development Report 2002. Deepening democracy in a fragmented world, United Nations, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
11. IPCC 2001. Climate change 2001. Synthesis report. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, United Kingdom, and New York, NY, USA.
12. Kaivo-oja J. 1999. Alternative scenarios of social development: Is analytical sustainability policy possible? How? Sustainable Development 7: 140-150.
13. Kaivo-oja J. 2001. Scenario learning and potential sustainable development processes in spatial contexts: towards risk society or ecological modernization scenarios? Futures Research Quarterly 17: 33-55.
14. Kaivo-oja J. 2002. Social and ecological destruction in the first class: A plausible social development scenario. Sustainable Development 10: 63-66.
15. Kaivo-oja J. & Suvinen N. 2001. Sosiaali- ja terveysalan tulevaisuuden näkymät vuoteen 2030. In: Voutilainen P., Saranto K., Peiponen A. & Mikkola T. (eds.), Hoitotyön vuosikirja 2002, Hoitotyön tulevaisuus, Hygienia, Kustannusosakeyhtiö Tammi, Helsinki, pp. 9-45.
16. Kaivo-oja J., Kuusi O. & Koski J. T. 1997. Sivistyksen tulevaisuusbarometri 1997. Tietoyhteiskunta ja elinikäinen oppiminen tulevaisuuden haasteina, Opetusministeriö, Tulevaisuuden tutkimuskeskus, Julkaisuja 25, Yliopistopaino, Helsinki.
17. Kaivo-oja J., Luukkanen J. & Malaska P. 2001. Sustainability evaluation frameworks and alternative analytical scenarios of national economies. Population and Environment 23: 193-215.
18. Luukkanen J. & Kaivo-oja J. 1999. The frames of global environmental policy in UNCED. No alternatives to construct social reality? World Futures: The Journal of General Evolution 54: 103-134.
19. Martens W.J.M. & Rotmans J. 2002. Transitions in a globalising world, Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, The Netherlands.
20. Myrdal G. 1967. Objectivity in social research, Random House, New York.
21. Nakićenović N., Alcamo J., Davis G., de Vries B., Fenhann J., Gaffin S., Gregory K., Grübler A., Jung T.Y., Kram T., La Rovere E.L., Michaelis L., Mori S., Morita T., Pepper W., Pitcher H., Price L., Raihi K., Roehrl A., Rogner H.-H., Sankovski A., Schlesinger M., Shukla P., Smith S., Swart R., van Rooijen S., Victor N. & Dadi Z. 2000. Emissions scenarios. A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
22. Parry M.L. (ed.) 2000. Assessment of potential effects and adaptations for climate change in Europe, The Europe ACACIA Project, Jackson Environmental Institute, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK, 320 pp.
23. Schwartz P. & Ogilvy J.A. 1998. Plotting your scenarios. In: Fahey L. & Randall R.M. (eds.), Learning from the future. Competitive foresight scenarios, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
24. Tirkkonen J., Kaivo-oja J. & Wilenius M. 2001. Ilmastoneuvotteluiden tuskainen taival kohti Kioton pöytäkirjan toimeenpanoa. Ulkopolitiikka 38: 116-129.
25. Uudenmaan liitto & YTV 1997. Uusimaa 2020. Kurkistuksia tulevaisuuteen. Pääkaupunki-seudun julkaisusarja B3: 1997. Uudenmaan liiton julkaisusarja C23-1997, Helsinki.
26. Wilenius M. & Puolanne E. 2002. Elintarviketalouden reunaehdot vuoteen 2030 mennessä, ETU 2030, MMM:n julkaisuja 9/2002, Helsinki.
27. Wilenius M. & Tirkkonen J. 1998. Building a regime for climate protection: Finland and international climate policy. Global Environmental Change 8: 291-308. 125