Well balanced finite volume methods for nearly hydrostatic flows

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 196, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 539-565

  Botta, N ^a   Klein, R ^a,b,c   Langenberg, S ^a   Lutzenkirchen S ^d  

^a POTSDAM INSTITUTE FOR CLIMATE IMPACT RESEARCH   (Germany)

^b ZUSE INSTITUTE BERLIN   (Germany)

^c FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^d NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (Norway)

Author keywords

Conservation form; Conservation laws; Hydrostatic balance

Indexed keywords

COMPRESSIBLE FLOW; HYDRAULICS; NUMERICAL METHODS; TOPOGRAPHY; WEATHER FORECASTING;

CONSERVATION FORMS; CONSERVATION LAW; DISCRETIZATIONS; DYNAMICAL CORE; FINITE-VOLUME METHOD; HYDROSTATIC BALANCE; NUMERICAL APPROXIMATIONS; NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION; TRUNCATION ERRORS; WELL BALANCED;

FINITE VOLUME METHOD;

EID: 2442475435     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2003.11.008     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. R. Benoit, M. Desdagné, P. Pellerin, Y. Chartier, S. Desjardins, The Canadian MC2: a semi-Lagrange, semi-implicit wide-band atmospheric model suited for fine-scale process studies and simulation, Month. Wea. Rev. 125 (1997) 2382-2415.
2. L. Bonaventura, A semi-implicit semi-Lagrangian scheme using the height coordinate for a nonhydrostatic and fully elastic model of atmospheric flows, J. Comput. Phys. 158 (2000) 186-213.
3. N. Botta, R. Klein, A. Almgren, Asymptotic analysis of a dry atmosphere, in: P. Neittaanmäki, T. Tiihonen, P. Tarvainen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference ENUMATH 99: Numerical Mathematics and Advanced Applications, World Scientific, Singapore, 2000.
4. P. Cargo, A.Y. Le Roux, Un schéma équilibre adapté au modèle d'atmosphère avec termes de gravité, C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris 318 (Série I) (1994) 73-76.
5. A. Corby, Gilchrist, R.L. Newson, A general circulation model of the atmosphere suitable for long period integration, QJRMS 98 (1972) 809-832.
6. R. Rotunno, D.J. Muraki, Revisiting Queney's Flow over Mesoscale Topography. Technical report, AMS mountain meteorology meeting, 2000.
7. G. Doms, U. Schättler, The nonhydrostatic limited-area model lm (lokal-modell) of dwd: Part i, scientific documentation, Deutscher Wetterdienst, 1997.
8. J. Dudhia, A nonhydrostatic version of the Penn State/NCAR mesoscale model: validation tests and simulation of an Atlantic cyclone and cold front, Month. Wea. Rev. 121 (1993) 1493-1513.
9. B. Einfeldt, Zur Numerik der stoßauflösenden Verfahren. Dissertation, RWTH Aachen, 1988.
10. J. Dudhia, G.A. Grell, DR. Stauffer, A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR mesoscale weather model (MM5). Technical report, NCAR/TN-398+STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, 1994.
11. T. Gal-Chen, R.C.J. Sommerville, Numerical solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations with topography, J. Comput. Phys. 17 (1975) 276-310.
12. A.E. Gill, Atmosphere-Ocean Dynamics, Academic Press, New York, 1982.
13. F.X. Giraldo, J.S. Hesthaven, T. Warbuton, Nodal high-order discontinuous Galerkin methods for the spherical shallow water equations, J. Comp. Phys 181 (2) (2002) 499-525.
14. J.M. Greenberg, A.Y. Le Roux, A well-balanced scheme for the numerical processing of source terms in hyperbolic equations, SIAM Numer. Anal. 33 (1) (1996) 1-16.
15. D. Hempel, Rekunstruktionsverfahren auf unstrukturierten Gittern zur numerischen Simulation von Erhaltungsprinzipien. PhD thesis, Universität Hamburg, Fachbereich Mathematik, 1999.
16. J. Hunter, J. Keller, Weakly nonlinear high frequency waves, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 36 (1983) 547-569.
17. Z.I. Janjic, A nonhydrostatic model based on a new approach, Meteor. Atmos. Phys. 82 (2002) 271-285.
18. P. Jenny, B. Müller, Rankine-Hugoniot-Riemann solver considering source terms and multidimensional effects, J. Comput. Phys. 145 (1998) 575-610.
19. W.A. Gallus Jr., J.B. Klemp, Behavior of flow over step orography, Month. Wea. Rev. 128 (2000) 1153-1164.
20. H. Kapitza, D.P. Eppel, The nonhydrostatic mesoscale model GESIMA. part I: Dynamical equations and tests, Beitr. Phys. Atmosph. 65 (2) (1992) 129-146.
21. R. Klein, Asymptotic analyses for atmospheric flows and the construction of asymptotically adaptive numerical methods, ZAMM - Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 80 (2000) 765-777.
22. J.B. Klemp, The weather research and forecasting (wrf) model. Technical report, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, http://www-unix.mcs.anl.gov/~michalak/ecmwf98/final.html.
23. J.B. Klemp, W.C. Skamarock, O. Fuhrer, Numerical consistency of metric terms in terrain-following coordinates, Month. Wea. Rev. 131 (2003) 1229-1239.
24. B. van, Leer. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. I. The quest of monotonicity, Lecture Notes Phys. 18 (1973) 163-168.
25. B. van Leer, Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. II. Monotonicity and conservation combined in a second-order scheme, J. Comput. Phys. 14 (1974) 361-370.
26. B. van Leer, Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. III. Upstream-centered finite-difference schemes for ideal compressible flow, J. Comput. Phys. 23 (1977) 263-275.
27. B. van Leer, Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. IV. A new approach to numerical convection, J. Comput. Phys. 23 (1977) 276-299.
28. B. van Leer, Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's method, J. Comput. Phys. 32 (1979) 101-136.
29. R.J. LeVeque, Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws, Birkhäuser, Basel, 1990.
30. R.J. LeVeque, Balancing source terms and flux gradients in high-resolution Godunov methods, J. Comput. Phys. 146 (1998) 346-365.
31. Ed. M.A. Alaka, The airflow over mountains. Technical report, WMO Tech. Note 34, 1960.
32. A.J. Majda, R. Klein, Systematic multi-scale models for the tropics, J. Atmos. Sci. 60 (2003) 393-408.
33. H. Nakamura, Dynamical effects of mountains on the general circulation of the atmosphere. I. Development of finite-difference schemes suitable for incorporating mountains, J. Meteor. Soc. Jpn. 56 (1978) 317-339.
34. J. Pedlosky, Geophisical Fluid Dynamics, second ed., Springer, Berlin, 1987.
35. J.-P. Pinty, R. Benoit, E. Richard, R. Laprise, Simple tests of a semi-implicit semi-Lagrangian model on 2D Mountain wave problems, Month. Wea. Rev. 123 (1995) 3042-3057.
36. P. Queney, The problem of air flow over mountains: a summary of theoretical studies, Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc. 29 (1948) 16-26.
37. R. Courant, K.O. Friedrichs, H. Lewy, Über die partiellen differenzengleichungen der physik, Math. Ann. 100 (1928) 32.
38. K. Saito, The JMA NWP system and the Nonhydrostatic Model NHM. Technical report, Japan Meteorological Agency, Tokyo, ksaitoνpd.kishou.go.jp.
39. K. Saito, G. Doms, U. Schaettler, J. Steppeler, 3-D mountain waves by the Lokal-Modell of DWD and the MRI mesoscale nonhydrostatic model, Papers Meteorol. Geophys. 49 (1) (1998) 7-19.
40. C. Schär, D. Leuenberger, O. Fuhrer, D. Lüthi, C. Girard, A new terrain-following vertical coordinate formulation for atmospheric prediction models, Month. Wea. Rev. 130 (2002) 2459-2480.
41. C.W. Schulz-Rinne, The Riemann problem for two-dimensional gas dynamics and new limiters for high-order schemes: PhD thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Diss. ETH No. 10297, 1993.
42. A.J. Simmons, D.M. Burridge, An energy and angular-momentum conserving vertical finite-difference scheme and hybrid vertical coordinates, Month. Wea. Rev. 109 (1981) 758-766.
43. R.B. Smith, Linear theory of stratified hydrostatic flow past an isolated mountain, Tellus 32 (1980) 348-364.
44. P.K. Sweby, High resolution schemes using flux limiters for hyperbolic conservation laws, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 21 (1994) 995-1011.
45. J.P. Gerrit Jr., Z.I. Janjic, S. Nickovic, An alternative approach to nonhydrostatic modeling, Month. Wea. Rev. 129 (2000) 1164-1178.