FEM-simulation of laminar flame propagation. I: Two-dimensional flames

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 196, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 417-447

  Michaelis, B ^a   Rogg, B ^a  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adaptive gridding; Chemical reactive flow; Finite elements; Low Mach number gaseous flow; Streamline diffusion; Upwinding

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMICS; MACH NUMBER; THERMODYNAMICS;

ADAPTIVE GRIDDING; CHEMICAL REACTIVE FLOW; FINITE ELEMENT; GRIDDING; LOW MACH NUMBERS; LOW-MACH-NUMBER GASEOUS FLOW; REACTIVE FLOW; STREAMLINE DIFFUSION; TWO-DIMENSIONAL; UPWINDING;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

EID: 2442468003     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2003.10.033     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. M.D. Smooke, A.A. Turnbull, R.E. Mitchell, D.E. Keyes, Solution of two-dimensional axisymmetric laminar diffusion flames by adaptive boundary value methods, in: C.-M. Brauner, C. Schmidt-Lainé (Eds.), Mathematical Modeling in Combustion and Related Topics, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1988, pp. 261-300.
2. M.D. Smooke, R.E. Mitchell, D.E. Keyes, Numerical solution of two-dimensional axisymmetric laminar diffusion flames, Combust. Sci. Technol. 67 (1989) 85-122.
3. Y. Xu, M.D. Smooke, P. Lin, M.B. Long, Primitive variable modeling of multidimensional laminar flames, Combust. Sci. Technol. 90 (1993) 289-313.
4. 2 ignition in two-dimensional geometries, in: A.L. Kuhl, J.-C. Leyer, A.A. Borisov, W.A. Sirignano (Eds.), Dynamics of Gaseous Combustion, Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, vol. 151, AIAA, Washington, DC, 1993, pp. 39-58.
5. A. Ern, C.C. Douglas, M.D. Smooke, Detailed chemistry modeling of laminar diffusion flames on parallel computers, Int. J. Supercomput. Appl. 9 (1995) 167-186.
6. B.A.V. Bennett, M.D. Smooke, Local rectangular refinement with application to axisymmetric laminar flames, Combust. Theory Model. 2 (1998) 221-258.
7. U. Riedel, A finite volume scheme on unstructured grids for stiff chemically reacting flows, Combust. Sci. Technol. 135 (1998) 99-116.
8. H.C. de Lange, L.P.H. de Goey, Numerical flow modeling in a locally refined grid, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 37 (1994) 497-515.
9. R.M.M. Mallens, H.C. de Lange, C.H.J. van de Ven, L.P.H. de Goey, Modeling of confined and unconfined laminar premixed flames on slit and tube burners, Combust. Sci. Technol. 107 (1995) 387-401.
10. L.T. Somers, L.P.H. de Goey, A numerical study of a premixed flame on a slit burner, Combust. Sci. Technol. 108 (1995) 121-132.
11. A. Ern, V. Giovangigli, Thermal diffusion effects in hydrogen-air and methane-air flames, Combust. Theory Model. 2 (1998) 349-372.
12. T. Echekki, J.H. Chen, Structure and propagation of methanol-air triple flames, Combust. Flame 114 (1998) 231-245.
13. P.N. Kĩoni, K.N.C. Bray, D.A. Greenhalgh, B. Rogg, Experimental and numerical studies of a triple flame, Combust. Flame 116 (1999) 192-206.
14. R. Becker, M. Braack, R. Rannacher, Numerical simulation of laminar flames at low Mach number by adaptive finite elements, Combust. Theory Model. 3 (1999) 503-534.
15. B. Michaelis, Simulation zweidimensionaler laminarer Flammen mit der Methode der finiten Elemente, PhD Thesis, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany, 2002.
16. M. Thiele, J. Warnatz, U. Maas, Geometric study of spark ignition in two dimensions, Combust. Theory Model. 4 (2000) 413-434.
17. R. Starke, P. Roth, An experimental investigation of flames behavior during cylindrical vessel explosions, Combust. Flame 66 (1986) 249-259.
18. D. Dunn-Rankin, P.K. Barr, R.F. Sawyer, Numerical and experimental study of tulip flame formation in a closed vessel, in: 21st Symposium (Int.) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, 1986, pp. 1291-1301.
19. M. Gonzales, R. Borghi, A. Saouab, Interaction of a flame front with its self-generated flow in an enclosure: the tulip flame phenomenon, Combust. Flame 88 (1992) 201-220.
20. M. Hishida, S.S. Wirawan, M. Wataru, Comparison between the full chemistry and global reaction models for tulip flame simulation, Trans. Jpn. Soc. Aero. Space Sci. 41 (1999) 209-215.
21. F.A. Williams, Combustion Theory, second ed., Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, 1985.
22. K.K. Kuo, Principles of Combustion, Wiley, New York, 1986.
23. R.G. Rehm, H.R. Baum, The equations of motion for thermally driven, buoyant flows, NBS J. Res. 83 (1978) 297-308.
24. A. Majda, Compressible Fluid Flow and Systems of Conservation Laws in Several Space Variables, Springer, New York, 1984.
25. A. Majda, J. Sethian, The derivation and numerical solution of the equations for zero Mach number combustion, Combust. Sci. Technol. 42 (1985) 185-205.
26. K.B. McGrattan, R.G. Rehm, H.R. Baum, Fire-driven flows in enclosures, J. Comput. Phys. 110 (1994) 285-291.
27. Th.v. Kármán, Fundamental Equations in Aerothermochemistry, Selected Combustion Problems, Part 2, Butterworths Scientific Publications, London, 1956, pp. 167-184.
28. P.M. Gresho, Incompressible fluid dynamics: Some fundamental formulation issues, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 23 (1991) 413-453.
29. C. Cuvelier, A. Segal, A.A. van Steenhoven, Finite Element Methods and Navier-Stokes Equations, D. Reidel Publishing, Dordrecht, 1986.
30. D.W. Kelly, S. Nakazawa, O.C. Zienkiewicz, J.C. Heinrich, A note on upwinding and anisotropic balancing dissipation in finite element approximations to convective diffusion problems, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 15 (1980) 1705-1711.
31. R. Peyret, Th.D. Taylor, Computational Methods for Fluid Flow, Springer, New York, 1983.
32. A.N. Brooks, J.R. Hughes, Streamline upwind Petrov-Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the Navier-Stokes equations, Comp. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 32 (1982) 199-259.
33. R. Kornhuber, R. Roitzsch, On adaptive grid refinement in the presence of internal or boundary layers, Impact Comp. Sci. Eng. 2 (1990) 40-72.
34. H. Wassenberg, Entwicklung eines Finite Elemente Rechenprogramms mit selbstadaptivem, mitbewegtem Gitter zur Simulation instationärer, zweidimensionaler, chemisch reagierender Strö mungen, Diplomarbeit Institut für Allgemeine Mechanik, Aachen, 1992.
35. E.S. Oran, J.P. Boris, Detailed modeling of combustion systems, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 7 (1981) 1-72.
36. J.O. Hirschfelder, C.F. Curtiss, Theory of propagation of flames. Part I: general equations, in: Third Symposium on Combustion and Flame and Explosion Phenomena, Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, 1949, pp. 121-127.
37. R.J. Kee, J. Warnatz, J.A. Miller, A FORTRAN Computer Code Package for the evaluation of gas-phase viscosities, conductivities, and diffusion coefficients, Technical Report Report SAND-8209, Sandia National Labs., 1983.
38. J. Warnatz, Influence of transport models and boundary conditions on flame structure, in: N. Peters, J. Warnatz (Eds.), Numerical Methods in Flame Propagation, Vieweg Verlag, Braunschweig/Wiesbaden, 1982, pp. 87-111.
39. T.P. Coffee, J.M. Heimerl, Transport algorithms for premixed, laminar steady-state flames, Combust. Flame 43 (1981) 273-289.