A comparison between parametric and PCA methods of dimension reduction application to an eddy current non destructive evaluation

International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics

Volumn 19, Issue 1-4, 2004, Pages 119-124

  Le Brusquet, Laurent ^a   Davoust, Marie Eve ^a   Fleury, Gilles ^a  

^a SUPELEC   (France)

Author keywords

Non destructive evaluation; Parametric model; Principal component analysis

Indexed keywords

CONDUCTIVE MATERIALS; DATA REDUCTION; FERROMAGNETIC MATERIALS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NEURAL NETWORKS; PIPE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

CALIBRATION ERRORS; NON DESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION; NONLINEAR REGRESSION MODEL; PARAMETRIC MODEL;

EDDY CURRENTS;

EID: 2442459910     PISSN: 13835416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/jae-2004-546     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (5)

1. G. Fleury and M.-E. Davoust, Remote field eddy current inspection for groove sizing - Choice of a direct model structure, Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, American Institute of Physics 19A,509 (2000), 541-548.
2. M.-E. Davoust G. Fleury and J. Oksman, A Parametric Estimation Approach for Groove Dimensioning Using Remote Field Eddy Current Inspection, Research in Nondestructive Evaluation 11 (1999), 39-57.
3. Karhunen J. Oja R. Hyärinen, A. Independent Component Analysis, Willey-Intersicience, 2001.
4. D.D. Mackintosh, D.L. Atherton, T.R. Schmidt and D.E. Russel, Remote Field Eddy Current for examination of ferromagnetic tubes, Material Evaluation 54 (1996), 652-657.
5. J.J. More, The Levenberg-Marquardt Algorithm: Implementation and Theory, Numerical Analysis, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 630 (1977), 105-116.