Forest forecasts: Does individual heterogeneity matter for market and landscape outcomes?

Forest Policy and Economics

Volumn 6, Issue 3-4, 2004, Pages 243-260

  Pattanayak, Subhrendu K ^a,b   Abt, Robert C ^b   Sommer, Allan J ^a   Cubbage, Fred ^b   Murray, Brian C ^a   Yang, Jui Chen ^a   Wear, David ^c   Ahn, SoEun ^d  

^a RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^d Korea Environment Institute (KEI)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Amenity demand; Forest inventory projection; Southern US forests; Timber supply; Wildlife habitat

Indexed keywords

ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS; MARKET MODELS; TIMBER MARKETS; TIMBER SUPPLY;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; FORECASTING; HARVESTING; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PUBLIC POLICY; SOFTWOODS; TIMBER;

FORESTRY;

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; FORECASTS; FORESTRY; FORESTS; HARVESTING; HETEROGENEITY; PARAMETERS; SOFTWOODS;

AMPHIBIA; AVES; REPTILIA;

EID: 2442453672     PISSN: 13899341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2004.03.017     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Abt R.C., Murray B.C. Southeastern US timber market response to climate change impacts on forestry and agriculture. World Resource Review. 13:(2):2001;171-186
2. Abt R.C., Cubbage F.W., Pacheco G. Southern forest resource assessment using the Subregional Timber Supply (SRTS) model. Forest Products Journal. 50:(4):2000;25-33
3. Abt R.C. A 'top-down' approach to modeling state forest growth, removals and inventory. Forest Products Journal. 39:(1):1989;71-76
4. Adams, D., Haynes, R. 1996. The 1993 timber assessment market model: structure, projections and policy simulations. PNW-GTR-368. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service
5. Amacher G.S., Conway M.C., Sullivan J. Econometric analyses of non-industrial forest landowners: is there anything left to study? Journal of Forest Economics. 9:(2):2003;137-164
6. Adams D., Haynes R. The timber assessment market model: structure, projections and policy simulations. Forest Science. 26:(3):1980;1-64
7. Beissinger S.R., Reed J.M., Wunderle J.M. Jr, Robinson S.K., Finch D.M. Report of the AOU Conservation Committee on the Partners in Flight species prioritization plan. The Auk. 117:2000;549-561
8. Binkley C. Timber Supply from Non-industrial Forests: a Microeconomic Analysis of Landowner Behavior. 1981;Yale University Press, New Haven
9. Boyd R. Government support of non-industrial production: the case of private forests. Southern Economic Journal. 51:(1):1984;89-107
10. Carter M.F., Hunber W.C., Pashley D.N., Rosenberg K.W. Setting conservation priorities for landbirds in the United States: The Partners in Flight approach. The Auk. 117:2000;541-548
11. Conway C., Amacher G.S., Sullivan J., Wear D. Decisions forest landowners make: an empirical examination. Journal of Forest Economics. 9:(3):2002;181-203
12. Cubbage F.W., Hogg D.W., Harris T.G., Alig R.J. Inventory projection with the Georgia Regional Timber Supply (GRITS) Model. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 14:(3):1990;137-142
13. Cubbage F.W., Harris T.G. Jr, Wear D.N., Abt R.C., Pacheco G. Timber supply in the South: where is all the wood? Journal of Forestry. 93:(7):1995;16-20
14. Dennis D. An economic analysis of harvest behavior: integrating forest and ownership characteristics. Forest Science. 35:(4):1989;1088-1104
15. Dennis D. A probit analysis of the harvest decision using pooled time-series and cross-sectional data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 18:1990;176-187
16. Faustmann, M., 1849. On the determination of the value which forest land and immature land possess for forestry. In: Gane, M., (Ed.), English edition, Oxford Institute Paper 42, 1968, Commonwealth Forestry Institute, Oxford University
17. Hamel, P.B., 1992. The Land Manager's Guide to the Birds of the South. The Nature Conservancy, Southeastern Region, Chapel Hill, NC
18. Hardie I., Parks P., Gottlieb P., Wear D. Responsiveness of rural and urban land uses to land rent determinants in the south. Land Economics. 76:(4):2000;659-673
19. Hartman R. The harvest decision when a standing forest has value. Economic Inquiry. 14:1976;52-58
20. Heckman J. Micro data, heterogeneity, and the evaluation of public policy: nobel lecture. Journal of Political Economy. 109:(4):2001;673-748
21. Hess, G., Sherling, S., Abt, R., Schaberg, R., 2000. Trends in Forest Composition and Size Class Distribution: Implications for Wildlife Habitat. Section 6-I in Economic and Ecologic Impacts Associated with Wood Chip Production in North Carolina. The Southern Center for Sustainable Forests, Raleigh, NC
22. Hodges D.G., Cubbage F.W. Non-industrial private forest management in the South: assistance foresters' activities and perceptions. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 14:1990;44-48
23. Hyberg B., Holthausen D. The behavior of non-industrial private forest landowners. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 19:1989;1014-1023
24. Lee, K., 1997. Hedonic estimation of non-industrial private forest landowner amenity value. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina
25. Matthews S., O'Connor R., Plantinga A.J. Quantifying the impacts on biodiversity of policies for carbon sequestration in forests. Ecological Economics. 40:(1):2002;71-87
26. McNulty S.G., Moore J.A., Iverson L., Prasad A., Abt R., Smith B., Sun G., Gavazzi M., Bartlett J., Murray B., Mickler R., Aber J.D. Development and application of linked regional scale growth, biogeography, and economic models for Southeastern United States Pine Forests. World Resources Review. 12:(2):2000;298-320
27. Mills, J.R., Kincaid, J.C., 1992. The aggregate timberland assessment system - ATLAS: A Comprehensive Timber Projection Model. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW GTR 281. Portland, OR: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station
28. Murray B.C., Abt R.C. Estimating price compensation requirements for eco-certified forestry. Ecological Economics. 36:(1):2001;149-163
29. Murray B.C., Abt R.C., Wear D.N., Parks P.J., Hardie I.W. Land allocation in the Southeastern US in response to climate change impacts on forestry and agriculture. World Resources Review. 13:(2):2001;239-251
30. Newman D.H., Wear D.N. Production economics of private forestry: a comparison of industrial and non-industrial forest owners. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 75:(3):1993;674-684
31. Pattanayak S.K., Murray B.C., Abt R. How joint in joint forest production: an econometric analysis of timber supply conditional on endogenous amenity values. Forest Science. 48:(3):2002;479-491
32. Pattanayak, S.K, Abt, K.L., Holmes, T.P., 2003. Timber and amenities on non-industrial private lands. In: Sills, E., Abt, K. (Eds.). Forests in a Market Economy. Forestry Sciences Series, Vol 72, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 243-258
33. Plantinga A.J., Wu J. Co-benefits from carbon sequestration in forests: evaluating reductions in agricultural externalities from an afforestation policy in Wisconsin. Land Economics. 79:(1):2003;74-85
34. Prestemon J.P., Abt R.C. The Southern timber market to 2040. Journal of Forestry. 101:(7):2002;16-22
35. Schaberg, R.H., Aruna, P.B., Cubbage, F.W., Hess, G.R., Abt, R.C., Richter, D.D., Warren, S.T., Gregory, J.D., Snider, A.G., Sherling, S., Flournoy, W. (forthcoming). Economic and ecological impacts of wood chip production in North Carolina: an integrated assessment and subsequent applications. Forest Policy and Economics
36. Siry J.P., Cubbage F.W., Malmquist A. Potential impacts of increased management intensities on planted pine growth and yield and timber supply modeling in the South. Forest Products Journal. 51:(3):2001;42-48
37. Wear D., Parks P. The economics of timber supply: an analytical synthesis of modeling approaches. Natural Resource Modeling. 8:(3):1994;199-223
38. Wear, D., Pattanayak, S.K., 2003. Aggregate timber supply: from the forests to the market. In: Sills, E., Abt, K. (Eds.). Forests in a Market Economy. Forestry Sciences Series, Vol 72, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 117-132
39. Williams J.C., Wright B.D. Storage and Commodity Markets. 1991';Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 502 pp.
40. Wilson, L.A. 1995. The Land Manager's Guide to the Amphibians and Reptiles of the South. The Nature Conservancy, Southeastern Region, Chapel Hill, NC