The GEDNAP blind trial concept part II. Trends and developments

International Journal of Legal Medicine

Volumn 118, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 83-89

  Rand, S ^a   Schurenkamp M ^a   Hohoff, C ^a   Brinkmann, B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Developments; Error recognition; GEDNAP; Quality assurance; Quality control

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ANALYTICAL ERROR; CONSENSUS; DNA DETERMINATION; DNA FINGERPRINTING; FORENSIC IDENTIFICATION; LABORATORY; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; STANDARDIZATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

CLINICAL TRIALS; DNA FINGERPRINTING; EUROPE; GENE LIBRARY; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; LABORATORIES; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 2442438030     PISSN: 09379827     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00414-003-0421-4     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Bär W, Brinkmann B, Germann U et al. (1992) GEDNAP (German-DNA-Profiling-Group) II. Projekt zur Standardisierung und Methodenharmonisierung in der forensischen DNA-Technologie. Rechtsmedizin 3:6-9
2. Baer W, Brinkmann B, Budowle B et al. (2000) DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics guidelines for mitochondrial DNA typing. Int J Legal Med 113:193-196
3. Brandstätter A, Parsons TJ, Parson W (2003) Rapid screening of mtDNA coding region SNPs for the identification of west European Caucasian haplogroups. Int J Legal Med (in press) DOI: s00414-003-0395-2
4. Brinkmann B, Bär W, Feuerbach M et al. (1993) GEDNAP III -Dritter Spurenringversuch der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rechtsmedizin. Rechtsmedizin 3:33-39
5. Bundesärztekammer (1992) Richtlinien der Bundesärztekammer zur Qualitätssicherung in der Immunhämatologie. Dtsch Arztebl 89:479-482
6. Cotton EA, Allsop RF, Guest JL et al. (2000) Validation of the AMPFISTR SGM plus system for use in forensic casework. Forensic Sci Int 112:151-161
7. Doutremépuich C, Morling N (eds) (2004) Progress in Forensic Genetics 10. Elsevier, Amsterdam
8. Edwards A, Hammond HA, Jin L, Caskey CT, Chakraborty R (1992) Genetic variation at five trimeric and tetrameric tandem repeat loci in four human population groups. Genomics 12: 241-253
9. Gill P (2001) An assessment of the utility of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for forensic purposes. Int J Legal Med 114:204-210
10. Gill P, Sparkes R, Fereday L, Werrett DJ (2000) Report of the European Network of Forensic Science Institutes (ENFSI): formulation and testing of principles to evaluate STR multiplexes. Forensic Sci Int 108:1-29
11. Gill P, Brenner C, Brinkmann B et al. (2001) DNA Commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: recommendations on forensic analysis using Y chromosome STRs. Int J Legal Med 114:305-309
12. Gusmao L, Alves C, Beleza S et al. (2002) Forensic evaluation and population data on the new Y-STRs DYS434, DYS437, DYS438, DYS439 and GATA A10. Int J Legal Med 116:139-147
13. Junge A, Madea B (2002) Forensische Spurenkunde. Genomxpress 1:4-5
14. Junge A, Lederer T, Braunschweiger G et al. (2003) Validation of the multiplex kit genRESMPX-2 for forensic casework analysis. Int J Legal Med (in press) DOI: s00414-003-0385-4
15. Klein R, Braunschweiger G, Junge A, Wiegand P (2003) A very long ACTBP2 (SE33) allele. Int J Legal Med 117:235-236
16. Morling N (2003) International recommendations for paternity testing standards. Int J Legal Med 117: 1
17. Morling N, Allen R, Carrecedo A et al. (2003) Paternity testing commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: recommendations on genetic investigations in paternity cases. Int J Legal Med 117:51-61
18. Puers C, Wiegand P, Bär W et al. (1992) GE-DNA-P (German DNA Profiling Group)-Studie. Rechtsmedizin 2:99-103
19. Rand S, Schürenkamp M, Brinkmann B (2002) The GEDNAP blind trial concept. Int J Legal Med 117:199-206
20. Schneider HR, Rand S, Schmitter H, Weichhold G (1998) ACTBP2-nomenclature recommendations of GEDNAP. Int J Legal Med 111:97-100
21. Sparkes R, Kimpton C, Watson S et al. (1996a) The validation of a 7-locus multiplex STR test for use in forensic casework I. Mixtures, ageing, degradation and species studies. Int J Legal Med 109:186-194
22. Sparkes R, Kimpton C, Gillbard S et al. (1996b) The validation of a 7-locus multiplex STR test for use in forensic casework II. Casework studies and success rates. Int J Legal Med 109:195-204
23. Szibor R, Krawczak M, Hering S et al. (2003) Use of X-linked markers for forensic purposes. Int J Legal Med 117:67-74
24. Tully G, Baer W, Brinkmann B et al. (2001) Considerations by the European DNA profiling (EDNAP) group on the working practices, nomenclature and interpretation of mitochondrial DNA profiles. Forensic Sci Int 124:83-91
25. Wiegand P, Budowle B, Rand S, Brinkmann B (1993) Forensic validation of the STR systems SE33 and TC11. Int J Legal Med 105:315-320
26. Wiegand P, Ambach E, Augustin C et al. (1995) GEDNAP IV and V. The 4th and 5th stain blind trials using DNA technology. Int J Legal Med 108:79-84
27. Wiegand P, Berger B, Edelmann J et al. (2003) Population genetic comparisons of three X-chromosomal STRs. Int J Legal Med 117:62-65