Multiplicative nonlinearity in the perception of apparent motion

Vision Research

Volumn 44, Issue 17, 2004, Pages 2001-2007

  Gilroy, Lee A ^a   Hock, Howard S ^b  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; LUMINANCE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL STIMULATION;

FOURIER ANALYSIS; HUMANS; LIGHT; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION;

EID: 2442436646     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.03.028     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Adelson E.H., Bergen J.R. Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 2:1985;284-299
2. Allik J., Pulver A. Contrast response of a movement encoding system. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 12:1995;1185-1197
3. Burr D.C., Ross J., Morrone M.C. Smooth and sampled motion. Vision Research. 26:1986;643-652
4. Cavanagh P. Attention-based motion perception. Science. 257:1992;1563-1565
5. Clifford C.W.G., Vaina L.M. A computational model of selective deficits in first and second-order motion processing. Vision Research. 39:1999;113-130
6. Dosher B.A., Landy M.S., Sperling G. Kinetic depth effect from optic flow - I. 3D shape from Fourier motion. Vision Research. 29:1989;1789-1813
7. Georgeson M.A., Georgeson J.M. Facilitation and masking of briefly presented gratings: time-course and contrast dependence. Vision Research. 27:1987;369-379
8. Hock H.S., Gilroy L.A., Harnett G. Counter-changing luminance: a non-Fourier, non-attentional basis for the perception of single-element apparent motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 26:2002;93-112
9. Hock H.S., Kogan K., Espinoza J.K. Dynamic, state-dependent thresholds for the perception of single-element apparent motion: bistability from local cooperativity. Perception & Psychophysics. 59:1997;1077-1088
10. Hock H.S., Park C., Schöner G. Self-organized pattern formation: experimental dissection of motion detection and motion integration by variation of attentional spread. Vision Research. 42:2002;991-1003
11. Johansson G. Configurations in event perception. 1950;Almqvist & Wiksells Boktryckeri AB, Uppsala
12. Lu Z.-L., Sperling G. Attention-generated apparent motion. Nature. 377:1995;237-239
13. Morgan M.J., Chubb C. Contrast facilitation in motion detection: evidence for a Reichardt detector in human vision. Vision Research. 39:1999;4217-4231
14. Morgan M.J., Cleary R.F. The effect of contrast substitutions upon motion detection in spatially random patterns. Vision Research. 32:1992;639-643
15. Naka K.I., Rushton W.A. S-potentials from colour units in the retina of fish. Journal of Physiology (London). 185:1966;584-599
16. Reichardt W. Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system. Rosenblith W.A. Sensory communication. 1961;303-317 Wiley, New York
17. van Santen J.P., Sperling H.G. Temporal covariance model of human motion perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 1:1984;451-473
18. van Santen J.P., Sperling H.G. Elaborated Reichardt detectors. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 2:1985;300-320