Unintended pregnancy among newly married couples in Shanghai

International Family Planning Perspectives

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 6-11

  Che, Yan ^a,b   Cleland, John ^b  

^a SHANGHAI INSTITUTE OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD RESEARCH   (China)

^b LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIRTH RATE; FAMILY PLANNING; MARRIAGE; PREGNANCY;

EID: 2442435673     PISSN: 01622749     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1363/3000604     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Williams LB and London KA, Changes in the planning status of births to ever-married U.S. women, 1982-1988, Family Planning Perspectives, 1994, 26(3):121-124.
2. Trussell J, Vaughan B and Stanford J, Are all contraceptive failures unintended pregnancies? evidence from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth, Family Planning Perspectives, 1999, 31(5):246-247 & 260.
3. Adetunji JA, Unintended childbearing in developing countries: levels, trends and determinants, Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) Analytical Report, Calverton, MD, USA: Macro International, 1998, No. 8.
4. Bankole A and Westoff CF, The consistency and validity of reproductive attitudes: evidence from Morocco, Journal of Biosocial Science, 1998, 30(4):439-455.
5. Williams L, Sobieszczyk T and Perez AE, Consistency between survey and interview data concerning pregnancy wantedness in the Philippines, Studies in Family Planning, 2001, 32(3):244-253.
6. Brown SS and Eisenberg L, eds., The Best Intentions: Unintended Pregnancy and the Well-Being of Children and Families, Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1995.
7. Montgomery MR et al., The consequences of imperfect fertility control for children's survival, health and schooling, DHS Analytical Report, Calverton, MD, USA: Macro International, 1997, No. 7.
8. Marston C and Cleland J, Do unintended pregnancies carried to term lead to adverse outcomes for mother and child? an assessment in five developing countries, Population Studies, 2003, 57(1):77-93.
9. Baydar N, Consequences for children of their birth planning status, Family Planning Perspectives, 1995, 27(6):228-234.
10. Eggleston E, Unintended pregnancy and women's use of prenatal care in Ecuador, Social Science & Medicine, 2000, 51(7):1011-1018.
11. Joyce TJ, Kaestner R and Korenman S, The effect of pregnancy intention on child development, Dimography, 2000,37(1):83-94.
12. Kost K, Landry DJ and Darroch JE, Predicting maternal behaviors during pregnancy: does intention status matter? Family Planning Perspectives, 1998, 30(2):79-88.
13. Magadi M, Madise NJ and Rodrigues RN, Frequency and timing of antenatal care in Kenya: explaining the variations between women of different communities, Social Science & Medicine, 2000, 51(4 ):551-561;
14. Pagnini DL and Reichman NE, Psychosocial factors and the timing of prenatal care among women in New Jersey's HealthStart program, Family Planning Perspectives, 2000,32(2):56-64.
15. Weller RH, Eberstein IW and Bailey M, Pregnancy wantedness and maternal behavior during pregnancy, Demography, 1987, 24(3):407-412.
16. Wang Y et al., Induced abortion in eight provinces of China, Asia-Pacific, Journal of Public Health, 1991, 5(1):32-40.
17. Wang DL and Diamond I, The impact on fertility of contraceptive failure in China in the 1980s, Journal of Biosocial Science, 1995, 27(3):277-284.
18. Lou C, Guo Y and Chou LP, Sex preference for offspring and its determinants among newly married couples in Shanghai, China Public Health, 1999, 15(3):235-238
19. Zhou JP, ed., Shanghai Almanac of Population and Family Planning, Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Press, 1999.
20. Xie Z, Reproductive requirement of Chinese farmers and its changes in Zhejiang, China Population Today, 1997, 14(5):3-4.
21. Yan C and Cleland J, Contraceptive use before and after marriage in Shanghai, Studies in Family Planning, 2003, 34(1):44-52.