The effect of employment interview format on principals' evaluations of teachers

Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 39-56

  Emley, Ken ^a   Ebmeier, Howard ^b  

^a Blue Valley School District   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24344494163     PISSN: 0920525X     EISSN: 15730425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1007947220472     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Arvey, R., & Campion, J. (1982). The employment interview: A summary and review of recent research. Personnal Psychology, 35(2), 281-318.
2. Ashton, P., & Webb, R. (1986). Making a difference: Teacher's sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York: Longman.
3. Baker, H., & Spier, M. (1990). The employment interview: Guaranteed improvement in reliability. Public Personnel Management, 19(1), 85-90.
4. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
5. Campion, M., Pursell, E., & Brown, B. (1988). Structured interviewing: Raising the psychometric properties of the employment interview. Personnel Psychology, 41(4), 25-42.
6. Cohen, S., & Gump, F. (1984). Using simulations to improve selection decisions. Training and Development Journal, 38(12), 85-88.
7. Dipboye, R. (1989). Threats to the incremental validity of interviewer judgments. In R. W. Eder & G. R. Ferris (Eds.), The employment interview: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 45-60). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8. Dipboye, R. (1994). Structured and unstructured selection interviews: Beyond the job-fit model. In G. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resource management (pp. 79-123). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
9. Dipboye, R., & Gaugler, B. (1993). Cognitive and behavioral processes in the selection interview. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman et al. (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 135-171). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Dougherty, T., Turban, D., & Callender, J. (1994). Confirming first impressions in the employment interview: A field study of interview behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(5), 659-665.
11. Ebmeier, H. (1990). Diagnostic assessment of school and principal effectiveness. KanLEAD Educational Consortium, United School Administrators, Topeka, Kansas.
12. Einhorn, L. (1981). An inner view of the job interview: An investigation of successful communication behaviors. Communication-Education, 30(3), 217-218.
13. Einhorn, L., Bradley, P., & Baird, J. (1982). Effective employment interviewing: Unlocking human potential (p. 10). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
14. Faust, D. (1984). The limits of scientific reasoning. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
15. Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569-582.
16. Gifford, R. (1985). Nonverbal cues in the employment interview: Links between applicant qualities and interviewer judgments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(4), 729-736.
17. Hakel, M., & Schuh, A. (1971). Job applicant attributes judged important across seven diverse occupations. Personnel Psychology, 24(1), 45-52.
18. Harris, M. (1989). Reconsidering the employment interview: A review of recent literature and suggestions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 42(4), 691-726.
19. Jenks, J., & Zevnik, B. (1989). ABC's of job interviewing. Haivard Business Review, 89(4), 38-44.
20. Marchese, M., & Muchinsky, P. (1993). The validity of the employment interview: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 1(1), 18-26.
21. McDaniel, M., Whetzel, D., Schmidt, F., & Maurer, S. (1994). The validity of employment interviews: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 599-616.
22. Meehl, E. (1986). Causes and effects of my disturbing little book. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50(3), 370-375.
23. Osburn, H., Timmreck, C., & Bigby, D. (1981). Effect of dimensional relevance on accuracy of simulated hiring decisions by employment interviewers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66(2), 159-165.
24. Pingitore, R., Dugoni, B., Tindale, R., & Sprint, B. (1994). Bias against overweight job applicants in a simulated employment interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(6), 909-917.
25. Sawyer, J. (1966). Measurement and prediction: Clinical and statistical. Psychological Bulletin, 66(3), 178-200.
26. Selection Research, Incorporated. (1986). Teacher perceiver interview manual. Lincoln, NE: Selection Research.
27. Shaw, E. A. (1972). Community of applicant stereotypes among recruiters. Personnel Psychology, 25(3), 421-432.
28. Shirk, L. (1996). Using computers in employee selection interviews. Doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas.
29. Springbett, B. M. (1954). Series effects in the employment interview. Doctoral dissertation, McGill University.
30. Tengler, C., & Jablin, F. (1983). Effects of question type, orientation, and sequencing in the employment screening interview. Communication Monographs, 50(3), 245-263.
31. Thayer, C. W. (1978). Project empathy: An alternative way to hire teachers. North Central Association Quarterly, 52, 438-442.
32. Tucker, D., & Rowe, P. (1979). Relationship between expectancy, casual attributions, and final hiring decisions in the employment interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(1), 27-34.
33. Vornberg, J., & Liles, K. (1983). Taking inventory of your interview techniques. National Association of Secondary School Principals, 67(459), 88-91.
34. Wiesner, W., & Cronshaw, S. (1988). A meta-analytic investigation of the impact of interview format and the degree of structure on the validity of the employment interview. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61(4), 275-290.
35. Woolfolk, A., & Hoy, W. (1990). Prospective teachers' sense of efficacy and beliefs about control. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 81-91.
36. Young, I., & Heneman, H. (1986). Predictors of interviewee reactions to the selection interview. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 19(2), 29-36.