Controlling NO x emission from industrial sources

Environmental Progress

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 181-197

  Srivastava, R K ^a   Neuffer, W ^b   Grano, D ^b   Khan, S ^b   Staudt, J E ^c   Jozewicz, W ^d  

^a U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

^b U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

^c Andover Technology Partners   (United States)

^d ARCADIS G and M Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CEMENT KILNS; COMBUSTION TURBINES; IC ENGINES; INDUSTRIAL COMBUSTION SOURCES;

BOILERS; COMBUSTION; ELECTRIC UTILITIES; FURNACES; INDUSTRIAL EMISSIONS; KILNS; LAWS AND LEGISLATION;

NITROGEN OXIDES;

EID: 24344490281     PISSN: 02784491     EISSN: None     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ep.10063     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Price, D., Birnbaum, R., Batiuk, R., McCullough, M., & Smith, R. (1997). Nitrogen oxides: Impacts on public health and the environment, EPA-452/R-97-002 (NTIS PB98-104631, August), Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation.
2. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. (2002). More details on nitrogen dioxide based on data through 2002, Research Triangle Park, NC: USEPA. Available at http://www. epa.gov/airtrends/nitrogen2.html (accessed October 2004).
3. USEPA Acid Rain Program. (1995). Nitrogen oxides emission reduction program: Direct final rule. Federal Register, 60, 71.
4. USEPA Acid Rain Program. (1996). Nitrogen oxides emission reduction program: Final rule. Federal Register, 61, 245.
5. x budget program, Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, June. Available at http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/otc/index. html (accessed October 2004).
6. USEPA. (1998). Regional transport of ozone, Research Triangle Park, NC: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Federal Register, 63, 207.
7. x: Control technologies and cost effectiveness for industrial boilers, gas turbines, IC engines and cement kilns. Andover, MA: Andover Technology Partners.
8. x: Control technologies and cost effectiveness for utility boilers. Andover, MA: Andover Technology Partners.
9. USEPA. (1990). Research and development pulverized coal combustion: Pollutant formation and control, EPA 600/8-90-049, May. Research Triangle Park, NC: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development.
10. x emissions from utility boilers, EPA-453/R-94-023 (NTIS PB94-184165), March. Research Triangle Park, NC: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
11. x burner, Burlingame, CA: Coen Co. Available at http:// www.coen.coin/i_html/qlnuln.html (accessed October 2004).
12. Andover Technology Partners. (2003). Memo from J. Staudt (Andover Technology Partners, Andover, MA) to S. Khan (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation, Washington, DC), September 10.
13. Buckingham, F.P. (1999). Personal communication: Low-cost combustion technologies to control NOx and PM emissions from oil and gas-fired boilers (Electric Power Technologies, Menlo Park, CA), with Staudt, J. (Andover Technology Partners, Andover, MA), August 20.
14. Combustion Components Associates. (2004). Case studies. Available at http://www.cca-inc.net/ case_study/case_studies.htm (accessed October 2004).
15. Encina Station Unit No. 4; http://www.johnzink. com/products/burners/ pdfs/case_study_ todd_106.pdf;
16. and Encina Station Unit No. 5; http:// www.johnzink.com/products/burners/ pdfs/ case_study_todd_107.pdf (both accessed October 2004).
17. Rapid Mix Burner Case Study 104; http://www. johnzink.com/products/ burners/html_todd/ burn_todd_cs_104.htm (accessed October 2004).
18. Coen Co. (2004). QLA burner, Burlingame, CA: Coen Co. Available at http://www.coen.com/ mrktlit/brochures/pdf/qla.pdf (accessed October 2004).
19. x emissions, Washington, DC: Institute of Clean Air Companies Inc.
20. x emissions, Washington, DC: Institute of Clean Air Companies Inc.
21. x system reference list (KTI, Concord, CA), with Staudt, J. (Andover Technology Partners, Andover, MA), April.
22. x control, EPRI/DOE/EPA Combined Utility Air Pollutant Control Symposium, Washington, DC, August 25-29.
23. Wendt, J.O.L., Sternling, C.V., & Matovich, M.A. (1973). Reduction of sulfur trioxide and nitrogen oxides by secondary fuel injection, Proceedings of the 14th Symposium (International) on Combustion (p. 881), Pittsburgh, PA: The Combustion Institute.
24. x control conference, March 11-12, Hartford, CT: Council of Industrial Boiler Owners.
25. x emissions using ozone injection, Proceedings of the ICAC Forum '98, Durham, NC, March 18-20.
26. x emissions from stationary gas turbines, EPA-453/R-93-007, January, Research Triangle Park, NC: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
27. x control approaching zero for gas turbines - Is it worth the price? Proceedings of Power Gen '98, Orlando, FL, December 10.
28. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP). (2000). Personal communication, K. Ramamurthy, Chief, Technical Support Section (PADEP) with Staudt, J. (Andover Technology Partners, Andover, MA), February 13.
29. Goal Line Technologies. (1999). Presentation to Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Manage-ment (NESCAUM), Stationary Source Committee, Northampton, MA, February 10.
30. USEPA. (1993). Alternative control techniques document - NOx emissions from stationary gas turbines, EPA-453/R-93-007, January, Research Triangle Park, NC: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
31. Andover Technology Partners. (2002). Analysis of the stationary point source NOx control market in the Houston Galveston area, Andover, MA: Andover Technology Partners.
32. x emissions and control techniques, Revised Final Report, EPA Contract No. 68-D98-026, September, prepared for US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC.
33. USEPA. (1993). Alternative control techniques document-NOx emissions from stationary reciprocating internal combustion engines; EPA-453/R-93-032, July, Research Triangle Park, NC: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
34. California Air Pollution Control Officers Association/Air Resources Board (CAPCOA/ARB). (1997). Proposed determination of reasonably available control technology and best available retrofit control technology for stationary internal combustion engines, Sacramento, CA: CAPCOA/ARB.
35. x emissions from natural gasfired lean burn engines, Report prepared for the Gas Research Institute, Chicago, IL, November 9.
36. x emissions by 82% and 92% from diesel and natural gas test engines using Johnson Matthey urea SCR (selective catalytic reduction) system, Press Release, December 6, London, UK: Johnson Matthey Pic.
37. Diesel & Gas Turbine Worldwide. (1998). SCR catalysts for pipeline company, Waukesha, WI: Diesel & Gas Turbine Worldwide Publications, October.
38. x control technologies for the cement industry, Final Report, EPA Contract No. 68-D98-026, September, prepared for US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC.
39. Portland Cement Association (PCA). (1997). U.S. and Canadian portland cement industry: Plant information summary, Skokie, IL: PCA.
40. x formation and variability in portland cement kiln systems potential control techniques and their feasibility and cost effectiveness, PCA R&D Serial No. 2227, December, Skokie, IL: PCA.
41. x variability emission and control from portland cement kilns, Proceedings of the 34th International Cement Seminar, Salt Lake City, UT, December 6-9.
42. Schrama, H., Blumenthal, M., & Weatherhead, E.C. (1996). A survey of tire burning technology for the cement industry, IEEE Cement Industry Technical Conference, San Juan, Puerto Rico, June 4-9, 1995.
43. Stillwater, M.A., & Wahlquist, C.J. (1998). Building a successful tire derived fuel program, Proceedings of the 34th International Cement Seminar, Salt Lake City, UT, December 6-9.
44. SM. (1999). Maximizing production and profits, Texas Industries, Inc. Marketing Presentation, Dallas, TX, June 9.
45. xOUT process, Proceedings of the Meeting of the General Technical Committee, Portland Cement Association, Seattle, WA, September 18-21.