Factors affecting ship design and construction lead time and cost

Journal of Ship Production

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 186-194

  Moyst, Howard ^a   Das, Biman ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSTRUCTION; COSTS; INTEGRATION; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS;

DESIGN PROCESSES; DESIGN QUALITY; SHIP DESIGN;

SHIPBUILDING;

EID: 24344485381     PISSN: 87561417     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. ARGOTE, L., BECKMAN, S. L., AND EPPLE, D. 1990 The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings, Management Science, 36, 140-154.
2. BENNETT, J. G., AND LAMB, T. 1996 Concurrent engineering: application and implementation for U.S. shipbuilding, JOURNAL OF SHIP PRODUCTION, 12, 2, 107-125.
3. BEVINS S. E, CLEMENS, C. F. JR., KING, D. E, KOGER, T. H. JR., AND POLLOCK, R. R. 1992 SEAWOLF design for modular construction, Marine Technology, 29, 4, 199-232.
4. BUNCH, H. M. 1987 Comparison of the construction planning and manpower schedules for building the PD214 general mobilization ship in a U.S. shipyard and in a Japanese shipyard, JOURNAL OF SHIP PRODUCTION, 3, 1, 25-36.
5. BUNCH, H. M. 1988 A study of the construction planning and manpower schedules for building the multipurpose mobilization ship, PD214, in a shipyard of the People's Republic of China, JOURNAL OF SHIP PRODUCTION, 4, 4, 244-266.
6. CHAPPELL, J. P. 1991 The application of critical path methodology to the management of ship design programs, Marine Technology, 28, 3, 113-128.
7. 1986 Evaluation of Design Effectiveness, Publication 8-1, The Construction Institute Design Task Force, Construction Industry Institute, Bureau of Engineering Research, The University of Texas at Austin, July.
8. 1990 The Impact of Changes on Construction Cost and Schedule, Publication 6-10, The Construction Institute Cost/Schedule Controls Task Force, Construction Industry Institute, Bureau of Engineering Research, The University of Texas at Austin, April.
9. COOPER, K. G. 1993 The rework cycle: benchmarks for the project manager, Project Management Journal, 24, 1, 17-21.
10. DROGOSZ, J. D. 2002 Applying lean above the factory floor, JOURNAL OF SHIP PRODUCTION, 18, 3, 159-166.
11. ERICHSEN, S. 1994 The effect of learning when building ships, JOURNAL OF SHIP PRODUCTION, 10, 3, 141-145.
12. FENTON, P. H. 1988 Rework management: a current perspective, JOURNAL OF SHIP PRODUCTION, 4, 2, 134-143.
13. FRANKEL, E. G. 1985 Impact of technological change on shipbuilding productivity, JOURNAL OF SHIP PRODUCTION, 1, 3, 174-183.
14. FRANKEL, E. G. 1996 Economics and management of American shipbuilding and the potential for commercial competitiveness, JOURNAL OF SHIP PRODUCTION, 12, 1, 1-10.
15. HENGST, S., AND KOPPIES, J. D. M. 1996 Analysis of competitiveness in commercial shipbuilding, JOURNAL OF SHIP PRODUCTION, 12, 2, 73-84.
16. HOBBS, B., AND BOUCHARD, M. 1990 The impact of a CAD system on a project organization, Project Management Institute Seminar/Symposium, October, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
17. HUBKA, V., AND EDER, W. E. 1987 A scientific approach to engineering design, Design Studies, 8, 3, 123-137.
18. IBBS, C. W., AND ALLEN, W. E. 1995 Quantitative Impacts of Project Change, Publication 108, The Construction Industry Institute, The University of Texas at Austin, May.
19. KANAWATY, G. 1992 Introduction to Work Study, 4th ed., International Labour Office, Geneva, Switzerland.
20. KOENIG, P. C., NARITA, H., AND BABA, K. 2002 Lean production in the Japanese shipbuilding industry, JOURNAL OF SHIP PRODUCTION, 18, 3, 167-174.
21. KRISHNAN, V., EPPINGER, S. D., AND WHITNEY, D. E. 1997 A model-based framework to overlap product development activities, MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 43, 4, 437-451.
22. LAMB, T. 1992 Organization theory and shipbuilding: a brief overview, Marine Technology, 29, 2, 71-83.
23. LOCH, C. H., AND TERWIESCH, C. 1999 Accelerating the process of engineering change orders: capacity and congestion effects, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16, 145-159.
24. LOCH, C. H., AND TERWIESCH, C. 1998 Communication and uncertainty in concurrent engineering, Management Science, 46, 8, 1032-1048.
25. MARITIME COASTAL DEFENCE VESSEL PROGRAM CONTRACT SPECIFICATION. 1992 System Engineering Plan, Halifax Shipyard Ltd./Fenco MacLearn Ltd., vol. 3, book 2.
26. MILLER, L. C. G. 1993 Concurrent Engineering Design: Integrating the Best Practices for Process Improvement, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, MI.
27. NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF CANADA. 1993 Productivity in Construction, Institute for Research in Construction, Ottawa, Canada.
28. SALERNO, V. 1995 Managing project change, 26th Annual Seminar/Symposium, Project Management Institute, New Orleans, LA.
29. SMITH, R. P., AND EPPINGER, S. D. 1997a A predictive model of sequential iteration in engineering design, Management Science, 43, 8, 1104-1120.
30. SMITH, R. P., AND EPPINGER, S. D. 1997b Identifying controlling features of engineering design iteration, Management Science, 43, 276-293.
31. SMITH, P. G., AND REINERTSEN, D. G. 1991 Developing Products in Half the Time, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
32. STORCH, R. L., AND SUKAPANPOTHARAM, S. 2002 Development of repeatable interim products utilizing the common generic block concept, JOURNAL OF SHIP PRODUCTION, 18, 4, 195-202.
33. SVERDRUP, C. F. 1985 Considerations regarding improved productivity based upon experience for series production of merchant ships, JOURNAL OF SHIP PRODUCTION, 1, 3, 149-156.
34. TERWIESCH, C., AND LOCH, C. H. 1999 Managing the process of engineering change orders: the case of the climate control system in automobile development, Journal of Product and Innovative Management, 16, 160-172.
35. WHEELWRIGHT, S. C., AND CLARK, K. B. 1992 Revolutionizing Product Development, The Free Press, Maxwell Macmillan, Canada.