Depth of lexical-semantic processing and sentential load

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 378-396

  Sanford, Alison J S ^a   Sanford, Anthony J ^b   Filik, Ruth ^b   Molle, Jo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Lexical processing; Referential load; Shallow processing; Syntactic complexity; Text change paradigm

Indexed keywords

EID: 24344482814     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.05.004     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. M. Ariel Accessing noun-phrase antecedents 1990 Routledge London
2. L. Baker & J.L. Wagner Evaluating information for truthfulness: The effects of logical subordination Memory & Cognition 15 1987 247-255
3. E.G. Bard A.H. Anderson C. Sotillo A. Newlands G. Doherty-Sneddon & M. Aylett Controlling the intelligibility of referring expressions in dialogue Journal of Memory and Language 42 2000 1-22
4. S.B. Barton & A.J. Sanford A case study of anomaly detection: Shallow semantic processing and cohesion establishment Memory & Cognition 21 1993 477-487
5. S. Bredart & K. Modolo Moses strikes again: Focalization effects on a semantic illusion Acta Psychologica 67 1988 135-144
6. T.G. Bever The cognitive basis of linguistic structures In J.R. Hayes (Eds.) Cognition and development of language 1970 Wiley New York 279-362
7. T.G. Bever The ascent of the spurious, or there's a lot more we don't know about mirrors In D. Cohen (Ed.) Explaining linguistic phenomena 1974 Hemisphere Washington, DC 173-200
8. Eastwick, E. C., & Phillips, C. (1999). Variability in semantic cue effectiveness on syntactic ambiguity resolution: Inducing low-span performance in high-span readers. Paper presented at the Architectures and Mechanisms of Language Processing Conference, Edinburgh, September 23-25, 1999.
9. T.A. Erickson & M.E. Matteson From words to meaning: A semantic illusion Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20 1981 540-552
10. F. Ferreira & C. Clifton Jr. The independence of syntactic processing Journal of Memory and Language 25 1986 348-368
11. F. Ferreira V. Ferraro & K.G.D. Bailey Good-enough representations in language comprehension Current Directions in Psychological Science 11 2002 11-15
12. S.C. Garrod & A.J. Sanford Resolving sentences in a discourse context: How discourse representation affects language understanding In M.A. Gernsbacher (Ed.) Handbook of psycholinguistics 1994 Academic Press San Diego, CA 675-698
13. E. Gibson Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies Cognition 68 1998 1-76
14. P.C. Gordon R. Hendrick & M. Johnson Memory interference during language processing Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27 2001 1411-1423
15. D. Grodner & E. Gibson Consequences of the serial nature of linguistic input for sentential complexity Cognitive Science. 29 2 2005 261-290
16. J. Gundel H. Hedberg & R. Zacharski Referring expressions in discourse Language 69 1993 274-307
17. B. Hannon & M. Daneman Susceptibility to semantic illusions: An individual differences perspective Memory & Cognition 29 2001 449-461
18. B. Hannon & M. Daneman Shallow semantic processing of text: An individual-differences account Discourse Processes 37 2004 187-204
19. Hobbs, J. R. (1985). Granularity. Paper presented at the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 432-435).
20. A. Hollingworth & J.M. Henderson Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28 2002 113-136
21. A. Hollingworth G. Schrock & J.M. Henderson Change detection and the flicker paradigm: The role of fixation position within the scene Memory & Cognition 29 2001 296-304
22. V.M. Holmes & J.K. O'Regan Eye fixation patterns during the reading of relative clause sentences Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20 1981 417-430
23. M.A. Just & P.A. Carpenter A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory Psychological Review 99 1992 122-149
24. M.B. Kac Center-embedding revisited Proceedings of the third annual conference of the cognitive science society 1981 Lawrence Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ 123-124
25. J. King & M.A. Just Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory Journal of Memory and Language 30 1991 580-602
26. R.L. Lewis Interference in short term memory: The magical number two (or three) in sentence processing Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 25 1996 93-117
27. W.M. Mak W. Vonk & H. Schriefers The influence of animacy on relative clause processing Journal of Memory and Language 47 2002 50-68
28. G.E. Raney & K. Rayner Word frequency effects and eye movements during two readings of a text Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 49 1995 151-172
29. L.M. Reder & G.W. Kusbit Locus of the Moses Illusion: Imperfect encoding, retrieval, or match? Journal of Memory and Language 30 1991 385-406
30. M. Rooth Focus In S. Lappin (Ed.) Handbook of contemporary semantic theory 1995 Blackwell London 271-298
31. A.J. Sanford & S.C. Garrod Understanding written language 1981 Wiley Chichester, UK
32. A.J. Sanford & P. Sturt Depth of processing in language comprehension: Not noticing the evidence Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 9 2002 382-386
33. Sanford, A. J. S., Molle, J., Sanford, A. J., & Healy, N. (2004). Shallow semantic processing of spoken utterances. Poster presented at the Architectures and Mechanisms of Language Processing conference, Aix-en-Provence, September 16-18, 2004.
34. D.J. Simons & D.T. Levin Change blindness Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1 1997 261-267
35. P. Sturt A.J. Sanford A.J. Stewart & E. Dawydiak Linguistic focus and good-enough representations: An application of the change-detection paradigm Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11 2004 882-888
36. M.J. Traxler R.K. Morris & R.E. Seely Processing subject and object relative clauses: Evidence from eye movements Journal of Memory and Language 47 2002 69-90
37. J.C. Trueswell M.K. Tanenhaus & S.M. Garnsey Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution Journal of Memory and Language 33 1994 285-318
38. J.A. Van Dyke & R.L. Lewis Distinguishing effects of structure and decay in attachment and repair: A cue-based parsing account of recovery from misanalyzed ambiguities Journal of Memory and Language 49 2003 285-316
39. H. Van Oostendorp & S. de Mul Moses beats Adam: A semantic relatedness effect on a semantic illusion Acta Psychologica 74 1990 35-46
40. Warren, T. (2001). Understanding the role of referential processing in sentence complexity. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, September 2001.
41. T. Warren & E. Gibson The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity Cognition 85 2002 79-112
42. Warren, T., & Gibson, E. (in press). The effects of NP-type on reading English Clefts. Language and Cognitive Processes.
43. P. Wason & S.S. Reich A verbal illusion Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 31 1979 591-597