Automatic motion correction for quantification of myocardial perfusion with dynamic magnetic resonance imaging

Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 105-117

  Kawakami, Kazunori ^a   Murase, Kenya ^a   Kumashiro, Masayuki ^a,b   Kawakami, Atsushi ^a   Tanki, Nobuyoshi ^a   Yamazaki, Youichi ^a   Tabuchi, Takashi ^b   Nagayama, Masako ^b   Watanabe, Yuji ^b  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b KURASHIKI CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Automatic motion correction; Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging; Myocardial perfusion; Quantification; Registration

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RESPIRATORY FUNCTION;

CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY CIRCULATION; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; RESPIRATORY PHYSIOLOGY;

EID: 24344481343     PISSN: 13473182     EISSN: 18802206     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2463/mrms.3.105     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bidaut LM, Vallee JP. Automated registration of dynamic MR images for the quantification of myocardial perfusion. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 13:648-655.
2. Dornier C, Ivancevic M, Thevenaz P, Vallee JP. Improvement in the quantification of myocardial perfusion using an automatic spline-based registration algorithm. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 18:160-168.
3. Gerig G, Kikinis R, Kuoni W, von Schulthess GK, Kubler O. Semi-automated ROI analysis in dynamic MR studies. Part I: image analysis tools for automatic correction of organ displacements. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991; 15:725-732.
4. Nestares O, Heeger DJ. Robust multiresolution alignment of MRI brain volumes. Magn Reson Med 2000; 43:705-715.
5. Rosenfeld A, Kak AC. Digital picture processing. Orland: Academic Press, Inc., 1982; 240-290.
6. Haralick RM, Sternberg SR, Zhuang X. Image analysis using mathematical morphology. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intell 1987; 9:532-550.
7. Larsson HB, Fritz-Hansen T, Rostrup E, Sondergaard L, Ring P, Henriksen O. Myocardial perfusion modeling using MRI. Magn Reson Med 1996; 35:716-726.
8. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP. Numerical recipes in C. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
9. Thevenaz P, Ruttimann UE, Unser M. A pyramid approach to subpixel registration based on intensity. IEEE Trans Image Processing 1998; 7:27-41.
10. Maes F, Collignon A, Marchal G, Gsuetens P. Mulimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1995; 16:187-198.
11. Wells WM, Viola P, Atsumi H, Nakajima S, Kikinis R. Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information. Med Image Anal 1996; 1:25-51.
12. He R, Narayana PA. Global optimisation of mutual information: application to three-dimensional retrospective registration of magnetic resonance image. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2002; 26:277-292.
13. Fennema CL, Thompson WB. Velocity determination in scenes containing several moving objects. Comput Vision Graphics Image Process 1979; 9:301-315.
14. Horn BKP, Schunk BG. Determining optical flow. Artif Intell 1981; 17:185-203.
15. Barron J, Fleet DJ, Beauchemin SS. Performance of optical flow techniques. Int J Comput Vision 1994; 12:43-77.
16. Black MJ, Anandan P. The robust estimation of multiple motions: parametric and piecewisesmooth flow fields. Comput Vision Image Understand 1996; 63:75-104.
17. Beaton AE, Tukey JW. The fitting of power series, meaning polynomials, illustrated on band-spectroscopic data. Technometrics 1974; 16:147-185.