Critically appraised topics and evidence-based medicine journals

Singapore Medical Journal

Volumn 46, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 442-449

  Dawes, Martin ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE; HISTORY OF MEDICINE; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL EXPERT; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; METAPHYSICS; PHYSICIAN; REVIEW;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; PERIODICALS; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PUBLISHING; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 24344468757     PISSN: 00375675     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Hook O. Scientific communications. History, electronic journals and impact factors. Scand J Rehabil Med 1999; 31:3-7.
2. Dawes M, Summerskill W, Glasziou P, et al. Sicily statement on evidence-based practice. BMC Med Educ 2005; 5:1.
3. Hodgkin K. Diagnostic vocabulary for primary care. J Fam Pract 1979; 8:129-44.
4. Gray JAM. Evidence-Based Healthcare. Churchill Livingstone, 1997:17.
5. Ioannidis JP, Haidich AB, Pappa M, et al. Comparison of evidence of treatment effects in randomized and nonrandomized studies. JAMA 2001; 286:821-30.
6. Juni P, Altman DG, Egger M. Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ 2001; 323:42-6.
7. Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, et al. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA 1999; 282:1061-6.
8. Shea B, Moher D, Graham I, et al. A comparison of the quality of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in paper-based journals. Eval Health Prof 2002; 25:116-29.
9. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet 1999; 354:1896-900.
10. Makela M, Witt K. How to read a paper: critical appraisal of studies for application in healthcare. Singapore Med J 2005; 46:1-5.
11. Guyatt G, Rennie D, eds. Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-based Clinical Practice. Chicago: American Medical Association Press, 2002.
12. Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, et al. Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2000.
13. Dawes M, Davis P, Gray A, et al. Evidence-Based Practice. A Primer for Health Care Professionals. 2nd ed. London: Elsevier, 2005.
14. Moher D, Jadad AR, Nichol G, et al. Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: an annotated bibliography of scales and checklists. Control Clin Trials 1995; 16:62-73.
15. Sauve S, Lee HN, Meade MD, et al. The critically appraised topic: a practical approach to learning critical appraisal. Ann Roy Soc Phys Surg Canada 1995; 28:396-8.
16. Ramos KD, Schafer S, Tracz SM. Validation of the Fresno test of competence in evidence based medicine. BMJ 2003; 326:319-21.
17. Coomarasamy A, Khan KS. What is the evidence that postgraduate teaching in evidence based medicine changes anything? A systematic review. BMJ 2004; 329:1017.
18. Dawes M, Godwin M. Global medical knowledge database is proposed. BMJ 2000; 320:1340.
19. Sackett DL, Straus SE. Finding and applying evidence during clinical rounds: the "evidence cart". JAMA 1998; 280:1336-8.
20. Dawes M. Creating a global medical knowledge database. The Family Doctor 2000; 16:16-7.
21. Dawes MG. On the need for evidence-based general and family practice. Evid Based Med 1996; 1:68-9.
22. Alkhenizan A. Diuretic based therapy reduced CV mortality in older patients with isolated systolic hypertension and diabetes. Evid Based Med 2005; 10:75.