Measurement analogies: Comparisons of behavioral and physical measures

Psychometrika

Volumn 70, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 227-251

  Luce, R Duncan ^a,b  

^a University of Californis   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24344465505     PISSN: 00333123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11336-004-1248-8     Document Type: Review

References (83)

1. Aczél, J. (1966). Lectures on Functional Equations and their Applications. New York: Academic Press.
2. Aczél, J. (1987). A Short Course on Functional Equations Based on Applications to the Behavioral and Social Sciences. Dordrecht-Boston-Lancaster- Tokyo: Reidel-Kluwer.
3. Aczél J. (1997). Bisymmetric and consistent aggregation: Historical review and recent results. In: A.A.J. Marley (Ed.), Choice, Decision, and Measurement: Essays in honor of R. Duncan Luce (pp. 225-233). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Aczél, J., & Daróczy, Z. (1975). On Measures of Information and Their Characterizations. New York: Academic Press.
5. Aczél, J., Falmagne, J.-C., & Luce, R.D. (2000). Functional equations in the behavioral sciences. Mathematica Japonica, 52, 469-512.
6. Aczél, J.,& Kuczma, M. (1991). Generalizations of a 'folk-theorem' on simple functional equations in a single variable. Results in Mathematics, 19, 5-21.
7. Aczél, J., Maksa, Gy., & Páles, Z. (1999). Solution to a functional equation arising from different ways of measuring utility. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 233, 740-748.
8. Aczél, J., Luce, R.D., & Marley, A.A.J. (2003). A functional equation arising from simultaneous utility representations. Results in Mathematics, 43, 193-197.
9. Beck, J., & Shaw, W.A. (1965). Magnitude of the standard, numerical value of the standard, and stimulus spacing in the estimation of loudness. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 21, 151-156.
10. Birnbaum, M.H. (1997). Violations of monotonicity in judgment and decision making. In A.A.J. Marley (Ed.), Choice, Decision, and Measurement: Essays in Honor of R. Duncan Luce (pp.73-100). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Birnbaum, M.H. (1999). Paradoxes of Allais, stochastic dominance, and decision weights. In J. Shanteau, B.A. Mellers, D. A. Schum (Eds.) Decision Science and Technology: Reflections on the Contributions of Ward Edwards (pp. 27-52). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
12. Choquet, G. (1953). Theory of capacities. Annales Inst. Fourier 5, 131-295.
13. Debreu, G. (1960). Topological methods in cardinal utility theory. In K.J. Arrow, S. Karlin, & R.D. Davis (Eds.) Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences, 1959 (pp. 16-26.) Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14. Doignon, J.-P., & Falmagne, J.-C. (1999). Knowledge Spaces. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
15. Ellermeier, W., & Faulhammer, G. (2000). Empirical evaluation of axioms fundamental to Stevens' ratio-scaling approach. I. Loudness production. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1505-1511.
16. Falmagne, J.-C. (1976). Random conjoint measurement and loudness summation. Psychological Review, 83, 65-79.
17. Falmagne, J.-C., Iverson, G., & Marcovici, S. (1979). Binaural " loudness" summation: Probabilistic theory and data. Psychological Review, 86, 25-43.
18. Gigerenzer, G., & Strube, G. (1983). Are there limits to binaural additivity of loudness? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 126-136.
19. Gilboa, I. (1987). Expected utility with purely subjective non-additive probabilities. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 16, 65-88.
20. Gonzalez, R., & Wu, G. (1998). On the shape of the probability weighting function. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 129-166.
21. Hellman, R.P., & Zwislocki, J. (1961). Some factors affecting the estimation of loudness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 33, 687-694.
22. Helmholtz, H.v. (1887). Zählen und Messen erkenntnis-theoretisch betrachet. Philosophische Aufsätz Eduard Zeller gewidmet, Leipzig.
23. Reprinted in Gesammelte Abhandl., vol. 3, 1895.
24. English translation by C.L. Bryan, Counting and Measuring. Princeton, NJ: van Nostrand, 1930.
25. Holder, O. (1901). Die Axiome der Quantität und die Lehre vom Mass. Ber. Verh. Kgl. Sächsis. Ges. Wiss. Leipzig, Math.-Phys. Classe, 53, 1-64.
26. Iverson, G. Myung, J.I., & Karabatsos, G. (2005). Intransitivity of preferences revisited, manuscript.
27. Iverson, G., & Falmagne, J.-C. (1985). Statistical issues in measurement. Mathematical Social Sciences, 10, 131-153.
28. Kahneman, D., & Tversky A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision making under risk. Econometrica, 41, 263-291.
29. Karabatsos, G. (2005). An exchangeable multinomial model for testing deterministic axioms of decision and measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 49, 51-69.
30. Krantz, D.H. (1971). Integration of just-noticeable differences. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 8, 591-599.
31. Krantz, D.H., Luce, R.D., Suppes, P., & Tversky, A. (1971). Foundations of Measurement, vol. I. San Diego: Academic Press.
32. Levelt, W.J.M., Riemersma, J.B., & Bunt, A.A. (1972). Binaural additivity of loudness. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 25, 51-68.
33. Liu, L. (1995). A Theory of Coarse Utility and its Application to Portfolio Analysis, University of Kansas, Ph.D. dissertation.
34. Luce, R.D. (1956). Semiorders and a theory of utility discrimination. Econometrica, 24, 178-191.
35. Luce, R.D. (1959). Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis, New York: Wiley.
36. Luce, R.D. (1990). Rational versus plausible accounting equivalences in preference judgments. Psychological Science, 1, 225-234.
37. Luce, R.D. (1991). Rank- and sign-dependent linear utility models for binary gambles. Journal of Economic Theory, 53, 75-100.
38. Luce, R.D. (1998). Coalescing, event commutativity, and theories of utility, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 16, 87-114. Errata: 1999, 18, 99.
39. Luce, R.D. (2000). Utility of Gains and Losses: Measurement-Theoretical and Experimental Approaches. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Errata: see Luce's web page at http:www.socsci.uci.edu.
40. Luce, R.D. (2001). Reduction invariance and Prelec's weighting functions. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 45, 167-179.
41. Luce, R.D. (2002). A psychophysical theory of intensity proportions, joint presentations, and matches. Psychological Review, 109, 520-532.
42. Luce, R.D. (2003). Increasing increment generalizations of rank-dependent theories, Theory and Decision, 55, 87-146.
43. Luce, R.D. (2004). Symmetric and asymmetric matching of joint presentations. Psychological Review, 111, 446-454.
44. Luce, R.D., & Edwards, W. (1958). The derivation of subjective scales from just noticeable differences. Psychological Review, 65, 222-237.
45. Luce, R.D., & Fishburn, P.C. (1991). Rank- and sign-dependent linear utility models for finite first-order gambles. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 4, 29-59.
46. Luce, R.D., & Fishburn, P.C. (1995). A note on deriving rank-dependent utility using additive joint receipts. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 11, 5-16.
47. Luce, R.D., Krantz, D.H., Suppes, P., & Tversky, A. (1990). Foundations of Measurement, Vol. III. San Diego: Academic Press.
48. Luce, R.D., & Marley, A.A.J. (2000). Elements of chance. Theory and Decision, 49, 97-126.
49. Luce, R.D., & Marley, A.A.J. (2005). Ranked additive utility representations of gambles: Old and new axiomatizations. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 30, 21-62.
50. Luce, R.D., & Tukey, J.W. (1964). Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, 1-27.
51. Lundberg, A. (2004). Variants of the distributivity equation arising in theories of utility and psychophysics. Aequationes Mathematicae, in press.
52. Maksa, G. (1999). Solution of generalized bisymmetry type equations without surjectivity assumptions. Aequationes Mathematicae, 57, 50-74.
53. Marley, A.A.J., & Luce, R.D. (2001). Ranked-weighted utility and qualitative convolution. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 23, 135-163.
54. Marley, A.A.J., & Luce, R.D. (2005). Independence properties vis-à-vis several utility representations, Theory and Decision, in press.
55. Meginniss, J.R. (1976). A new class of symmetric utility rules for gambles, subjective marginal probability functions, and a generalized Bayes' rule. In Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Business and Economic Statistics Section (pp. 471-476).
56. Myung, J.I., Karabatsos, G., & Iverson, G.J. (2005). A Bayesian approach to testing decision making axioms. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, in press.
57. Narens, L. (1996). A theory of ratio magnitude estimation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 40, 109-129.
58. Narens, L. (2002). Theories of Meaningfulness. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
59. Ng, C.T., Luce, R.D., & Aczél, J. (2002). Functional characterizations of basic properties of utility representations. Monatshefte für Mathematik, 135, 305-319.
60. Prelec, D. (1998). The probability weighting function. Econometrica, 66, 497-527.
61. Quiggin, J. (1982). A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,3, 323-343.
62. Quiggin, J. (1993).Generalized Expected Utility Theory: The Rank-Dependent Model. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
63. Ramsey, F.P. (1931). The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co. See Ch. VII.
64. Reprinted in H.E. Kyburg, & H.E. Smokier (Eds.) (1964). Studies in Subjective Probability (pp. 61-92.) New York: Wiley.
65. Savage, L.J. (1954). The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Wiley.
66. Schmeidler, D. (1989). Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica, 57, 571-587.
67. Schneider, B. (1988) The additivity of loudness across critical bands: a conjoint measurement approach. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 211-222.
68. Schneider, B., Parker, S., Ostrosky, D., Stein, D., & Kanow, G. (1974). A scale for the psychological magnitude of numbers. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 43-46.
69. Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (1993). Testing for juxtaposition and event-splitting effects. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 6, 235-254.
70. Steingrimsson, R. (2002).Contributions to Measuring Three Psychophysical Attributes: Testing Behavioral Axioms for Loudness, Response Time as an Independent Variable, and Attentional Intensity. Psychology Ph.D. Dissertation, U.C. Irvine.
71. Steingrimsson, R., & Luce, R.D. (2005a). Empirical evaluation of a model of global psychophysical judgments: I. Behavioral properties of summations and productions. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, in press.
72. Steingrimsson, R., & Luce, R.D. (2005b). Empirical evaluation of a model of global psychophysical judgments: I. Behavioral properties linking summations and productions. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, in press.
73. Steingrimsson, R., & Luce, R.D. (2005c). Empirical evaluation of a model of global psychophysical judgments: III. Form for the Psychophysical Function and Perceptual Filtering. Submitted.
74. Steingrimsson, R., & Luce, R.D. (2005d). Empirical evaluation of a model of global psychophysical judgments: IV. Forms for the Weighting Function. In preparation.
75. Stevens, S.S. (1975). Psychophysics: Introduction to its Perceptual, Neural, and Social Prospects, New York: Wiley.
76. Tversky, A. (1969). Intransitivity of preferences. Psychological Review, 76, 31-48.
77. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297-323.
78. von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, (2nd Ed). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
79. Wakker, P.P. (1991). Additive representations on rank-ordered sets. I. The algebraic approach. Journal of Mathematical Psychology,35, 501-531.
80. Wu, G., & Markle, A.B. (2005). An empirical test of gain-loss separability in prospect theory, under review.
81. Zimmer, K. (2005). Examining the validity of numerical ratios in loudness fractionation. Perception & Psychophysics, in press.
82. Zimmer, K., & Baumann, O. (2003a). Direct scaling of sensations: Are subjects able to produce consistent, and meaningful, numerical ratios? In Proceedings of the First ISCA Tutorial & Research Workshop on Auditory Quality of Systems, (pp. 85-90).
83. Zimmer, K., & Baumann, O. (2003b). Validity of Luce's transformation function relating numerals and numbers in loudness fractionation. Abstracts for Fechner Day 2003 (pp. 343-348).