Quantifying COTS component functional adaptation

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3107, Issue , 2004, Pages 195-204

  Cechich, Alejandra ^a   Piattini, Mario ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DEL COMAHUE   (Argentina)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CASTILLA LA MANCHA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Component based system assessment; COTS components; Metrics; Software quality

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; SOFTWARE PACKAGES;

COMPONENT ADAPTATION; COMPONENT BASED SYSTEMS; COMPONENT-BASED MODELING; COTS COMPONENT; FUNCTIONAL ADAPTATION; METRICS; SOFTWARE MEASUREMENT; SOFTWARE QUALITY;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY;

EID: 24344453638     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-27799-6_16     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. C. Abts. COTS-Based Systems (CBS) Functional density - A Heuristic for Better CBS Design. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on COTS-Based Software Systems, volume 2255 of LNCS, pages 1-9. Springer, 2002.
2. R. Alexander and M. Blackburn. Component Assessment Using SpecificationBased Analysis and Testing. Technical Report SPC-98095-CMC, Software Productivity Consortium, 1999.
3. K. Ballurio, B. Scalzo, and L. Rose. Risk Reduction in COTS Software Selection with BASIS. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on COTS-Based Software Systems, volume 2255 of LNCS, pages 31-43. Springer, 2002.
4. A. Cechich and M. Piattini. On the Measurement of COTS Functional Suitability. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on COTS-Based Software Systems, volume 2959 of LNCS. Springer, 2004.
5. L. Chung, B. Nixon, E. Yu, and J. Mylopoulos. Non-Functional Requirements in Software Engineering. Kluwer Academic Publisher, 2000.
6. L. Chung and N. Subramanian. Process-Oriented Metrics for Software Architecture Adaptability. In Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE '01), pages 310-312, 2001.
7. R. Deline. A Catalog of Techniques for Resolving Packaging Mismatch. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Software Reusability, Los Angeles, CA, 1999.
8. C. Gacek. Detecting Architectural Mismatches During System Composition. Technical Report USC/CSE-97-TR-50G, University of Southern California, 1997.
9. L. Holmes. Evaluating COTS Using Function Fit Analysis. Q/P Management Group, INC - http://www.qpmg.com.
10. L. Jilani and J. Desharnais. Defining and Applying Measures of Distance Between Specifications. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 27(8):673-703, 2001.
11. M. Nick and R. Feldmann. Guidelines for Evaluation and Improvement of Reuse and Experience Repository Systems Through Measurement Programs. In Proceedings of the Third European Software Measurement Conference, 2000.
12. R. Selby. Quantitative Studies of Software Reuse. In Software Reusability Vol II Applications and Experiences, T. Biggerstaff and A. Perils (Eds.). Addison Wesley, 1989.
13. M. Shaw and D. Garlan. Software Architecture: Perspectives on an Emerging Discipline. Prentice Hall, 1996.