Understanding governance and networks: EU-US interactions and the regulation of genetically modified organisms

Geoforum

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 593-606

  Murphy, Joseph ^a   Yanacopulos, Helen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

European Union; Genetically modified organisms; Governance; Governance failure; Meta governance; Transnational networks; United States

Indexed keywords

EUROPEAN UNION; GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISM; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; NETWORKING; REGULATORY APPROACH;

EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

EID: 24344448636     PISSN: 00167185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Buttel, F., 2000. GMOs: The Achilles heel of the globalization regime? Paper prepared for the annual meeting of the Rural Sociological Society. Washington, DC, August 2000.
2. E. Czempiel Governance and democratisation In: J. Rosenau E. Czempiel (Eds.) Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics 1992 Cambridge University Press Cambridge 250-271
3. EC - European Commission, 2001. The EU-US Consultative Forum on Biotechnology - Commentary on the report from the Commission services, Brussels, European Commission.
4. EU-US Biotechnology Consultative Forum, 2000. Final Report (December).
5. Fliorini, A., 1999. The third force: The rise of transnational civil society. Tokyo and Washington, Japan Center for International Change and Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
6. FoEE- Friends of the Earth Europe, 1999. FoEE Biotech Mailout 5 (5) 31 July 1999.
7. R. Higgott G. Underhill A. Bieler Non-state Actors and Authority in the Global System 2000 Routledge New York
8. C. Huxham (Ed.) Creating Collaborative Advantage 1996 Sage Publications London
9. B. Jessop The rise of governance and the risk of failure International Social Science Journal 50/155 1998 29-45
10. B. Jessop Multi-level governance and multi-level meta-governance In: I. Bache M. Flinders (Eds.) Multi-level Governance 2004 Oxford University Press Oxford 49-74
11. M. Keck K. Sikkink Activists Beyond borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics 1998 Cornell University Press Ithaca
12. S. Khagram V. Riker K. Sikkink Restructuring World Politics: Transnational Social Movements, Networks and Norms 2002 University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis
13. J. Kooiman Modern Governance 1993 Sage Publications London
14. Levidow, L., Carr, S., Wield, D., 1999. EU-Level Report - Safety regulation of transgenic cAops: Completing the internal market: a study of the implementation of EC Directive 90/220. A report to DGXII, The Open University.
15. L. Levidow C. Marris Science and governance in Europe: Lessons from the case of agricultural biotechnology Science and Public Policy 28 5 2001 345-360
16. PEW (2003) US vs. EU: An examination of the trade issues surrounding genetically modified food. Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology. August 2003.
17. J. Pfeffer G.R. Salancik The External Control of Organisation: A Resource Dependency Perspective 1978 Harper and Row New York
18. J. Pierre Debating Governance: Authority, Steering and Democracy 2000 Oxford University Press Oxford
19. J. Rosenau Governance, order, and change in world politics In: J. Rosenau E. Czempiel (Eds.) Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics 1992 Cambridge University Press Cambridge 1-29
20. M. Sewell J. Salter Panarchy and other norms for global governance: Boutros-Ghali, Rosenau and beyond Global Governance 1 3 1995
21. TABD - Transatlantic Business Dialogue, 1997. Rome communiqu. CEO Conference, Rome.
22. TABD - Transatlantic Business Dialogue, 1998. Statement of conclusions. CEO Conference, Charlotte.
23. TACD - Transatlantic Consumer Dialogue, 1999a. Annual Report 1999.
24. TACD -Transatlantic Consumer Dialogue, 1999b. Genetically modified organisms (GMOs), TACD position paper. Doc No. FOOD-5-99, issued April 1999.
25. TACD - Transatlantic Consumer Dialogue, 2000. Consumer concerns about biotechnology and genetically modified organisms (GMOs). TACD position paper. Doc No. FOOD-5PP-00, issued February 2000.
26. TEP - Transatlantic Economic Partnership, 1998a. The Declaration on the Transatlantic Economic Partnership. EU-US Summit, London, 18 May 1998.
27. TEP - Transatlantic Economic Partnership, 1998b. Transatlantic Economic Partnership Action Plan.
28. TEP - Transatlantic Economic Partnership, 2000. Report of Transatlantic Economic Partnership Steering Group. Report made to the meeting of trade and economic ministers at the US-EU Summit in Washington. December 18, 2000.
29. USDS - United States Department of State, 2000. Fact sheet on the US-EU biotechnology consultative forum, US Department of State, Office of the Spokesman.
30. H. Yanacopulos Think local, act global: Transnational networks and development In: J. Robinson (Ed.) Development and Displacement 2001 Oxford University Press Oxford
31. O. Young Institutional linkages in international society: Polar perspectives Global Governance 2 1 1997