The conflict between optimization and regularity in building behaviour of the caddisfly, Chaetopteryx villosa fabr. (Limnephilidae: Prichoptera), larvae

Zhurnal Obshchei Biologii

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 52-54

  Nepomnyashchikh, V A ^a  

^a PAPANIN INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGY OF INLAND WATERS   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; CHAETOPTERYX VILLOSA; LIMNEPHILIDAE; TRICHOPTERA;

EID: 24344440813     PISSN: 00444596     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Aronson R.B., Givnish T.J. Optimal central-place foragers: a comparison with null hypotheses // Ecology. 1983. V. 64. No 2. P. 395-399.
2. Bell W.J. Searching Behaviour: The Nehavioural Ecology of Finding Resources. N.Y.: Chapman and Hall, 1991. 275 p.
3. Charnov E.L. Optimal foraging and marginal value theorem // Theor. Pop. Biol. 1976. V. 9. No 1. P. 129-136.
4. Cheverton J., Kacelnik A., Krebs J.R. Optimal foraging: constraints and currencies // Experimental Behavioral Ecology. Stuttgart: G. Fisher Verlag, 1985. P. 109-126.
5. Cole B.J. Chaos and behavior: the perspective of nonlinear dynamics // Behavioral Mechanisms in Evolutionary Ecology / Ed. Real L. Chicago: Univ. Chacago Press, 1994. P. 423-443.
6. Cole B.J. Fractal time in animal behaviour: the movement activity of Drosophila // Anim. Behav. 1995. V. 50. No 4. P. 1317-1324.
7. Dukas R., Real L.A. Effect of recent experience on foraging decisions by foraging bumble bees // Oecologia (Belrin). 1993. V. 94. No 1. P. 244-246.
8. Elliot J.M. Life histories and drifting of three species of Limnephilidae // Oikos. 1971. V. 22. No 1. P. 56-61.
9. Goulson D., Ollerton J., Sluman C. Foraging strategies in the small skipper butterfly, Thymelicus flavus: when to switch? // Anim. Behav. 1997. V. 53. No 5. P. 1009-1016.
10. Gray R.D. Faith and foraging: a critique of the paradigm argument from design // Foraging Behavior / Eds Kamil A.C., Krebs J.R., Pulliam H.R. N.Y.: Plenum Press, 1987. P. 69-140.
11. Green R.F. Stochastic models for optimal foraging // Foraging behaviour / Eds Kamil A.C. Krebs J.R., Pulliam Y.R. N.Y.: Plenum Press, 1987. P. 273-302.
12. Hanna H.M. Selection of materials for case-building by larvae of caddis flies (Trichoptera) // Proc. Roy. Entomol. Soc. London. Ser. A. 1961. V. 36. No 1/3. P. 37-47.
13. Hansell M.H. The house building behaviour of the caddis fly larva Silo pallipes Fabricius // Anim. Behav. 1968. V. 16. No 4. P. 558-584.
14. Janetos A.C., Cole B.J. Imperfectly optimal animals // Behav. Ecol. and Sociobiol. 1981. V. 9. No 2. P. 203-210.
15. Johansson A. Caddis larvae cases (Trichoptera, Limnephilidae) as anti-predatory devices against brown trout and sculpin // Hydrobiologia. 1991. V. 211. No 1. P. 185-194.
16. Keasar T., Shmida A., Motro U. Innate movement rules in foraging bees: flight distances are affected by recent rewards and are correlated with choice of flower type // Behav. Ecol. and Sociobiol. 1996. V. 39. No 6. P. 381-388.
17. Mackay R.J., Wiggins G.B. Ecological diversity in Trichoptera // Ann. Rev. Entomol. 1979. V. 24. P. 185-208.
18. Majecki J., Tomaszewski C. The role of case in the process of gas exchange in some Trichoptera species // Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Trichoptera, 1989. Poznan: Adam Mickievicz Univ. Press, 1991. P. 217-221.
19. Morden J.H. Remote perception of floral nectar by bumblebees // Oecologia (Belrin). 1984. V. 64. No 1. P. 232-240.
20. Martin J.R., Ernst R., Heisenberg M. Temporal pattern of locomotor activity in Drosophila melanogaster // J. Comp. Physiol. Ser. A. 1999. V. 184. No 1. P. 73-84.
21. Mitchell W.A., Valone T.J. The optimization research program: studying adaptations by their function // Quart. Rev. Biol. 1990. V. 65. No 1. P. 43-52.
22. Motro U., Shmida A. Near-far search: an evolutionary stable foraging strategy // J. Theor. Biol. 1995. V. 173. No 1. P. 15-22.
23. Nepomnyashchikh V.A. Selection behaviour in caddis fly larvae // From Animals to Animals 5: Proceedings of the Figth International Conference of the Society for Adaptive Behavior. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press, 1998. P. 155-160.
24. Nislow K.H., Molles M.C., Jr. Predators and case-building caddisflies // Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Trichoptera. Poznan: Adam Mickievicz Univ. Press, 1991. P. 125-128.
25. Nislow K.H., Molles M.C., Jr. The influence of larval case design on vulnerability of Limnephilus frijole (Trichoptera) to pradation // Freshwater Biol. 1993. V. 29. No 3. P. 411-417.
26. Nonacs P., Dill L.M. Is satisficing an alternative to optimal foraging theory? // Oikos. 1993. V. 67. No 2. P. 371-375.
27. Otto C. Habitat, size and distribution of Scandinavian limnephilid caddisflies // Oikos. 1982. V. 38. No 2. P. 355-360.
28. Otto C., Johansson A. Why do some caddis larvae in runnung waters construct heavy, bulky cases? Anim. Behav. 1995. V. 49. No 2. P. 473-478.
29. Otto C., Svensson B.S. The significance of case material selection for the survival of caddis larvae // J. Anim. Ecol. 1980. V. 49. No 4. P. 855-865.
30. Philipson G.N. The effect of water flow and oxygen concentration on six species of caddis fly (Trichoptera) larvae // Proc. Zool. Soc. London. Ser. B. 1954. V. 124. No 3. P. 547-564.
31. Pierce G.J., Ollason J.G. Eight reasons why optimal foraging theory is a complete waste of time // Oikos. 1987. V. 49. No 1. P. 111-118.
32. Rita H., Ranta E. Stochastic patch exploitation model // Proc. Roy. Soc. London. Ser. B. 1998. V. 265. No 1393. P. 309-315.
33. Roughgarden J. Rule of thumb // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1991. V. 14. No 1. P. 104-105.
34. Rowlands M.L.J., Hansell M.H. Case design, construction and ontogeny of building in Glyphotaelius pellucidus caddisfly larvae // J. Zool. London. 1987. V. 211. No 2. P. 239-356.
35. Saverio G.F. Oicodomia dopo accecamento e d'asportazione delle antenne nelle larve di Limnophilus rhombicus L. (Trichoptera: Limnophilidae) // Boll. Zool. 1964. V. 31. No 2. P. 921-940.
36. Schoener T.W. A brief history of optimal foraging ecology // Foraging Behavior / Eds Kamil A.C., Krebs J.R., Pulliam H.R. N.Y.: Plenum Press, 1987. P. 5-67.
37. Stearns S.C., Schmid-Hempel P. Evolutionary insights should not be wasted // Oikos. 1987. V. 49. No 1. P. 118-125.
38. Stephens D.W., Krebs J.R. Foraging theory Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1986. 247 p.
39. Thomas G. The influence of eating and rejecting prey items upon feeding and food searching behaviour in Gasterosteus aculeatus L. // Anim. Behav. 1977. V. 25. No 1. P. 52-66.
40. Viswanathan G.M., Afanasyev V., Buldyrev S.V., Murphy E.J., Prince P.A., Stanley H.E. Levy flight search patterns of wandering albatrosses // Nature. 1996. V. 381. No 6581. P. 413-415.
41. Wallace I.D., Wallace B., Philipson G.N. A key to the case-bearing caddis larvae of Britain and Ireland // Freshwater Biological Association. Scientific Publication No 51. 1990. 237 p.
42. Ward D. The role of satisficing in foraging theory // Oikos. 1992. V. 63. No 2. P. 312-317.
43. Ward D. Foraging theory, like all other fields of science, needs multiple working hypotheses // Oikos. 1993. V. 67. No 2. P. 367-378.
44. Weimerskirch H., Wilson R.P., Lys P. Activity pattern of foraging in the wandering albatross: a marine predator with two modes of prey searching // Marine Ecology Progress Series. 1997. V. 151. P. 245-254.
45. Wiggins G.B. Larvae of the North American caddisfly genera (Trichoptera). Toronto, Buffalo: Univ. Toronto Press, 1977. 401 p.
46. Wildhaber M.L., Growder L.B. Mechanisms of patch choice by bluegills (Lepomis macrochirus) foraging in a variable environment // Copeia. 1991. No 2. P. 445-460.
47. Williams D.D., Penac B.L. Some aspects of case building in Phryganea cinerea Walker (Trichoptera: Phryganeidae) // Anim. Behav. 1980. V. 28. No 1. P. 103-110.
48. Williams D.D., Tavares A.F., Bryant E. Respiratory device of camouflage? A case for the caddisfly // Oikos. 1987. V. 50. No 1. P. 42-52.
49. Ydenberg R.C., Houston A.I. Optimal trade-offs between competing behavioural demands in the great tit / Anim. Behav. 1986. V. 34. No 4. P. 1041-1050.
50. Zintl H. Zum problem der Wahl des Baumaterials bei der Larva von Potamophylax latipennis (Trichoptera, Limnophilidae) // Ztschr. Tierpsychol. 1970. V. 27. No 2. P. 441-447.