Comparison of PI controller tuning methods

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 44, Issue 17, 2005, Pages 6741-6750

  Foley, Michael W ^a   Ramharack, Navin R ^a   Copeland, Brian R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST INDIES   (Trinidad and Tobago)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CONTROL EQUIPMENT; FEEDBACK; FUNCTIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS);

DIRECT SYNTHESIS; FEEDBACK LOOPS; PID CONTROLLERS; TUNING ALGORITHMS;

TWO TERM CONTROL SYSTEMS;

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING; CONTROL SYSTEM;

EID: 24144494529     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie040258o     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Luyben, W. L. Process Modeling, Simulation and Control for Chemical Engineers, 2nd ed.; McGraw-Hill: New Yolk, 1990.
2. Luyben, W. L. Plantwide Dynamic Simulators in Chemical Processing and Control; Marcel-Dekker: New York, 2002.
3. O'Dwyer, A. Handbook of PI and PID Tuning Rules; Imperial College Press: London, 2003.
4. Ziegler, J. G.; Nichols, N. B. Optimum Settings for Automatic Controllers. Trans. ASME 1942, 65, 433.
5. Seborg, D. E.; Edgar, T. F.; Mellichamp, D. A. Process Dynamics and Control, 2nd ed.; Wiley: New York, 2004.
6. Skogestad, S. Simple Analytic Rules for Model Reduction and PID Controller Tuning. J. Process Control 2003, 13, 291.
7. Chen, D.; Seborg, D. E. PI/PID Controller Design Based on Direct Synthesis and Disturbance Rejection. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, 41, 4807.
8. Wang, Y.-G.; Shao, H.-H. Optimal Tuning for PI Controller. Automatica 2000, 36, 147.
9. Rivera, D. E.; Morari, M.; Skogestad, S. Internal Model Control. 4. PID Controller Design. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 1986, 25, 252.
10. Ko, B.-S.; Edgar, T. F. Assessment of Achievable PI Control Performance for Processes with Dead Time. Proc. Am. Control Conf. 1998, 1548.
11. Horton, E. C.; Foley, M. W.; Kwok, K. E. Performance Assessment of Level Controllers. International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 2003, 17, 663.
12. MacGregor, J. F.; Harris, T. J.; Wright, J. D. Duality between the Control of Processes Subject to Randomly Occurring Deterministic Disturbances and ARIMA Stochastic Disturbances. Technometrics 1984, 26, 389.
13. Marlin, T. E. Process Control: Designing Processes and Control Systems for Dynamic Performance; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1995.
14. Garcia, C. E.; Morari, M. Internal Model Control. 1. A Unifying Review and Some New Results. Ind., Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 1982, 21, 308.
15. Åström, K. J.; Hagglund, T. PID Controllers: Theory, Design and Tuning, 2nd ed.; Instrument Society of America: Research Triangle Park, NC, 1995.
16. Middleton, R. H.; Graebe, S. F. Slow Stable Open-Loop Poles: To Cancel or Not To Cancel. Automatica 1999, 35, 877.
17. Morari, M.; Zafiriou, E. Robust Process Control; Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, 1989.
18. Huang, B. A Pragmatic Approach towards Assessment of Control Loop Performance. International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 2003, 17, 589.
19. Wang, L.; Cluett, W. R. From Plant Data to Process Control: Ideas for Process Identification and PID Design; Taylor and Francis: London, 2000.
20. Zhuang, M.; Atherton, D. P. Automatic Tuning of Optimum PID Controllers. IEE Proc. D 1993, 140, 216.
21. Palmor, Z. J.; Shinnar, R. Design of Sampled-Data Controllers. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 1979, 18, 8.
22. Franklin, G.; Powell, J.; Workman, M. Digital Control of Dynamic Systems, 2nd ed.; Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, 1990.
23. Kristiansson, K.; Lennartson, B. Robust and Optimal Tuning of PI and PID Controllers. IEE Proc. Control Theory Appl. 2002, 149, 17.