Cytologic features of squamous cell carcinoma in conventional smears: Comparison of cases that performed poorly with those that performed well in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology

Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Volumn 129, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 1097-1099

  Renshaw, Andrew A ^a   Henry, Michael R ^b   Birdsong, George G ^c   Wang, Edward ^d   Haja, Jennifer ^d   Hughes, Jonathan H ^e  

^a BAPTIST HOSPITAL OF MIAMI   (United States)

^b DEPARTMENT OF COLORECTAL SURGERY   (United States)

^c Grady Health Systems   (United States)

^d North Carolina   (United States)

^e Laboratory Med Consultants Ltd   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CELL SIZE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CYTODIAGNOSIS; DYSPLASIA; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INFLAMMATION; KERATINIZATION; SMEAR; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; TISSUE PREPARATION; TRICHOMONAS; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY;

CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; FEMALE; HUMANS; NORTH AMERICA; PATHOLOGY, CLINICAL; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUALITY CONTROL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 24144491063     PISSN: 00039985     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Renshaw AA. Measuring sensitivity in gynecologic cytology: a review. Cancer Cytopathol. 2002;96:210-217.
2. O'Sullivan JP, Chapman PA, Jenkins L, Smith R. Characteristics of high grade dyskaryotic cervical smears likely to be missed on rapid rescreening. Acta Cytol. 2000;44:37-40.
3. Mitchell H, Medley G. Differences between Papanicolaou smears with correct and incorrect diagnoses. Cytopathology. 1995;6:368-375.
4. Renshaw AA, Schulte MA, Plott E, et al, for the Cytopathology Resource Committee, College of American Pathologists. Cytologic features of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in ThinPrep Papanicolaou test slides: comparison of cases that performed poorly with those that performed well in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004;128:746-748.
5. Renshaw AA, Prey MU, Kodes L, Weisson M, Haja J, Moriarty AT, for the Gynecologic Cytology Committee, College of American Pathologists. Cytologic features of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in conventional slides: what is the difference between cases that perform well and those that perform poorly? Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005;129:733-735.
6. Renshaw AA, Dubray-Benstein B, HaJa J, Hughes JH, for the Cytopathology Resource Committee, College of American Pathologists. Cytologic features of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in ThinPrep Papanicolaou test slides and conventional smears: comparison of cases that performed poorly with those that performed well in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005;129:23-25.
7. Renshaw AA, Dubray-Benstein B, Cobb CJ, et al, for the Gynecologic Cytology Committee, College of American Pathologists. Cytologic features of squamous cell carcinoma in ThinPrep slides: evaluation of cases that performed poorly versus those that performed well in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004;128:403-405.