Derived nominalizations in -ee: A Role and Reference Grammar based semantic analysis

English Language and Linguistics

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 129-159

  Muñoz, Carmen Portero ^a,b  

^a University of Córdoba

^b UNIVERSITY OF CÓRDOBA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24144484474     PISSN: 13606743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1360674303211059     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Allen, M. (1978). Morphological investigations. PhD thesis, University of Connecticut
2. Aronoff, M. (1976). Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
3. Baayen, H. & R. Lieber (1991). Productivity in English derivation: a corpus-based study. Linguistics 29: 801-43
4. Barker, C. (1998). Episodic -ee in English: a thematic role constraint on new word formation. Language 74: 695-727
5. Bauer, L. (1983). English word formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
6. Bauer, L. (1988). Introducing linguistic morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
7. Bolinger, D. L. (1941). Among the new words. American Speech 16: 91-2
8. Bresnan, J. (1990). Levels of representation in locative inversion: a comparison of English and Chichewa. MS, Stanford University and Xerox PARC
9. Bresnan, J. & J. Kanerva (1989). Locative inversion in Chichewa: a case study of factorization in grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 1-50
10. Burzio, L. (1981). Intransitive verbs and Italian auxiliaries. Dissertation, MIT
11. Burzio, L. (1983). Condition on representation and Romance syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 14: 193-221
12. Burzio, L. (1986). Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel
13. Coopmans, P. (1989). Where stylistic and syntactic processes meet: locative inversion in English. Language 65: 728-51
14. Dik, S. C. (1989). The theory of functional grammar, Part I: The structure of the clause. Dordrecht: Foris
15. Dowty, D. (1979). Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel
16. Dowty, D. (1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67: 547-619
17. Fabb, N. (1984). Syntactic affixation. Dissertation, MIT
18. Foley, W. A. & R. D. Van Valin (1984). Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
19. Green, G. M. (1974). Semantics and syntactic regularity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press
20. Hoekstra, T. & R. Mulder (1990). Unergatives as copular verbs: locational and existential predication. Linguistic Review 7: 1-79
21. Horn, L. R. (1980). Affixation and the unaccusative hypothesis. Chicago Linguistics Society 16: 134-46
22. Jackendoff, R. S. (1976). Toward an explanatory semantic representation. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 89-150
23. Jackendoff, R. S. (1987). The status of thematic relations in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 369-411
24. Jackendoff, R. S. (1990). Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
25. Keyser, S. J. & T. Roeper (1984). On the middle and ergative constructions in English. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 381-416
26. Laca, B. (1993). Las nominalizaciones orientadas y los derivados españoles en -dor y -nte. In Varela, S. (ed.), La formación de palabras. Madrid: Taurus. 180-204
27. Levin, L. (1985). Operations on lexical forms: unaccusative rules in Germanic languages. Doctoral dissertation, MIT
28. Levin, B. (1993). English verb classes and alternations. Chicago: Chicago University Press
29. Levin, B. & M. Rappaport (1986). The formation of adjectival passives. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 623-61
30. Levin, B. & M. Rappaport (1988). Nonevent -er nominals: a probe into argument structure. Linguistics 26: 1067-83
31. Levin, B. & M. Rappaport (1992). The lexical semantics of verbs of motion: the perspective from unaccusativity. In Roca, I. M. (ed.), Thematic structure: its role in grammar. Dordrecht: Foris. 247-69
32. Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
33. Mackenzie, L. (1990). First argument nominalization in a functional grammar of English. Linguistica Antuerpiensia 24: 119-47
34. Marchand, H. (1969). The categories and types of present day English word formation. 2nd edition. Munich: C. H. Beck
35. Nunes, M. L. (1993). Argument linking in English derived nominals. In Van Valin, R. D. (ed.), Advances in role and reference grammar. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 375-432
36. Perlmutter, D. (1978). Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. Berkeley Linguistics Society 4: 157-89
37. Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: the acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
38. Plag, I. (1999). Morphological productivity: structural constraints in English derivation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
39. Pustejovsky, J. (1991). The generative lexicon. Computational Linguistics 17: 409-41
40. Pustejovsky, J. (1995). The generative lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
41. Rappaport, M. & B. Levin (1992). -Er nominals: implications for the theory of argument structure. Syntax and Semantics 26: 127-53
42. Ryder, M. (1991). Mixers, mufflers and mousers: the extending of the -er suffix as a case of prototype reanalysis. Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. 299-311
43. Ryder, M. (1999). Bankers and blue-chippers: an account of -er formations in present-day English. English Language and Linguistics 3: 269-97
44. Sadock, J. M. & J. N. Levi (1977). Ergativity in English. CLS Book of Squibs. 91-3
45. Salire, W. (1982). What's the good word? New York: Times Books
46. Van Valin, R. D., Jr. (1977). Aspects of Lakhota syntax. PhD dissertation, University of Berkeley, California
47. Van Valin, R. D. (1990). Semantic parameters of split intransitivity. Language 66: 221-60
48. Van Valin, R. D. (ed.) (1993). Advances in role and reference grammar. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins
49. Van Valin, R. D., Jr & W. A. Foley (1980). Role and reference grammar. In Moravcsik and Wirth (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 13: Current approaches to syntax. New York: Academic Press. 329-52
50. Van Valin, R. D. & R. LaPolla (1997). Syntax: structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: University Press
51. Vendler, Z. (1967 [1957]). Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press