Analysis of dose-response effects on gene expression data with comparison of two microarray platforms

Bioinformatics

Volumn 21, Issue 17, 2005, Pages 3524-3529

  Hu, Jianhua ^a   Kapoor, Mini ^a   Zhang, Wei ^a   Hamilton, Stanley R ^a   Coombes, Kevin R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPLEMENTARY DNA; FLUOROURACIL;

ARTICLE; CANCER CELL CULTURE; COLON CARCINOMA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA MICROARRAY; DOSE RESPONSE; GENE EXPRESSION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 24144482677     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti592     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Barlow,R.E., Bartholomew,D.J., Bremner,J.M. and Brunk,H.D. (1972) Statistical Inference Under Order Restrictions. Wiley, New York.
2. Boguski,M.S. and Schuler,G.D. (1995) Establishing a human transcript map. Nat. Genetics, 10, 369-371.
3. Boverhof,D.R. et al. (2004) Temporal- and dose-dependent hepatic gene expression changes in immature ovariectomized mice following exposure to ethynyl estradiol. Carcinogenesis, 25, 1277-1291.
4. Braam,B. et al. (2004) Nitric oxide donor induces temporal and dose-dependent reduction of gene expression in human endothelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol., 287, H1977-H1986.
5. Breslow,N.E. and Day,N.E. (1987) Statistical Methods in Cancer Research. Vol. II. The Design and Analysis of Cohort Studies. IARC Scientific Publications, Lyon.
6. Cheng,R.Y. et al. (2003) Gene expression dose-response changes in microarrays after exposure of human peripheral lung epithelial cells to nickel(ii). Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 191, 22-39.
7. Haber,L.T. et al. (2001) Applications of mechanistic data in risk assessment: The past, present, and future. Toxicol. Sci., 61 32-39.
8. Huffman,D.L. et al. (2004) Mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways defend against bacterial pore-forrmng toxins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 10995-11000.
9. Kato,N. et al. (2004) Gene expression profile in the livers of rats orally administered ethinylestradiol for 28 days using a microarray technique. Toxicology, 200, 179-192.
10. Kuo,W.P. et al. (2002) Analysis of matched mrna measurements from two different microarray technologies. Bioinformatics, 18, 405-412.
11. Lawson,C.L. and Hanson,R.J. (1974) Solving Least-Squares Problems. Prentice-Hall, New York.
12. Maclure,M. and Greenland,S. (1992) Tests for trend and dose-response: misinterpretations and alternative. Am. J. Epidemiol., 135, 96-104.
13. Naciff,J.M. et al. (2003) Gene expression profile induced by l7α-ethynyl estradiol in the prepubertal female reproductive system of the rat. Toxicol. Sci., 72, 314-330.
14. Nichols,C.D. and Sanders-Bush,E.J. (2004) Molecular genetic responses to lysergic acid diethylamide include transcriptional activation of map kinase phosphatase-1, c/ebp-beta and ilad-1, a novel gene with homology to arrestins. Neurochemistry, 90, 576-584.
15. Pounds,S. and Morris,S.W. (2003) Estimating the occurrence of false positives and false negatives in microarray studies by approximating and partitioning the empirical distribution of P-values. Bioinformatics, 19, 1236-1242.
16. Preston,R.J. (2002) Quantitation of molecular endpoints for the dose-response component of cancer risk assessment. Toxicol. Pathol. 30, 112-116.
17. Robertson,T., Wright,F.T. and Dykstra,R. (1988) Order Restricted Statistical Inference. Wiley, New York.
18. Wu,M.M. et al. (1989) Dose - response relation between arsenic concentration in well water and mortality from cancers and vascular diseases. Am. J. Epidemiol., 130, 1123-1132.
19. Zhang,W. et al. (2003) Apoptotic response to 5-fluoruracil treatment is mediated by reduced polyamines, non-autocrine fas ligand, and induced tumor necrosis factor receptor 2. Cancer Biol. Ther., 2, 572-578.
20. Zhao,H. et al. (2004) Diverse effects of methylseleninic acid on the transcriptional program of human prostate cancer cells. Mol. Biol. Cell, 15, 506-519.