A cross-national comparison of school drug policies in Washington State, United States, and Victoria, Australia

Journal of School Health

Volumn 75, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 134-140

  Beyers, Jennifer M ^a   Evans Whipp, Tracy ^b   Mathers, Megan ^b   Toumbourou, John W ^b   Catalano, Richard F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b MURDOCH CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; PUNISHMENT; SCHOOL; SMOKING; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ALCOHOL DRINKING; COMMUNICATION; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; PUNISHMENT; SCHOOLS; SMOKING; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; VICTORIA; WASHINGTON;

EID: 24144474328     PISSN: 00224391     EISSN: 17461561     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2005.00011.x     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Flay BR. Approaches to substance use prevention utilizing school curriculum plus social environment change. Addict Behav. 2000 25 : 861 885.
2. Denman S. Health promoting schools in England - a way forward in development. J Public Health Med. 1999 21 : 215 220.
3. Unger JB Rohrbach LA Howard KA Cruz TB Johnson CA Chen XG. Attitudes toward anti-tobacco policy among California youth: associations with smoking status, psychosocial variables and advocacy actions. Health Educ Res. 1999 14 : 751 763.
4. Goodstadt MS. Substance abuse curricula vs. school drug policies. J Sch Health. 1989 59 : 246 250.
5. Ministerial Council on Drug Strategy. The National Drug Strategy: Australia's Integrated Framework 2004-2009. Canberra : Ministerial Council on Drug Strategy 2004.
6. The White House. National Drug Control Strategy. Washington, DC : The White House 2004.
7. Caulkins JP Reuter P. Setting goals for drug policy: harm reduction or use reduction? Addiction. 1997 92 : 1143 1150.
8. Evans-Whipp T Beyers JM Lloyd S, et al. A review of school drug policies and their impact on youth substance use. Health Promot Int. 2004 19 : 227 234.
9. Paul JL Berger NH Osnes PG Martinez YG Morse WC. Ethics and Decision Making in Local Schools: Inclusion, Policy, and Reform. Baltimore, Md : Paul H. Brookes 1997.
10. Hartland J Tudor-Smith C Bowker S. Smoke-free policies in schools: a qualitative investigation of the benefits and barriers. Health Educ J. 1998 57 : 51 59.
11. Bukoski WJ. School-based substance abuse prevention: a review of program research. J Child Contemp Soc. 1985 18 : 95 115.
12. Denman S Pearson J Hopkins D Wallbanks C Skuriat V. The management and organisation of health promotion: a survey of school policies in Nottinghamshire. Health Educ J. 1999 58 : 165 176.
13. Gliksman L Allison K Adlaf E Newton-Taylor B. Toward comprehensive school drug policy in Ontario. J Drug Educ. 1995 25 : 129 138.
14. Brener ND Dittus PJ Hayes G. Family and community involvement in schools: results from the School Health Policies and Programs Study 2000. J Sch Health. 2001 71 : 340 350.
15. Mallick J Evans R Stein G. Parents and drug education: parents' concerns, attitudes and needs. Drug Educ Prev Policy. 1998 5 : 169 176.
16. Tubman JG Vento RS. Principal and teacher reports of strategies to enforce anti-tobacco. J Sch Health. 2001 71 : 229 235.
17. Hallfors D Sporer A Pankratz M Godette D. Drug Free Schools Survey. Report of Results. Chapel Hill : University of North Carolina 2000.
18. Hallfors D Pankratz M Sporer A. Drug Free Schools Survey II. Report of Results. Chapel Hill : School of Public Health, University of North Carolina 2001.
19. Brener ND Kann L Smith TK. Reliability and validity of the School Health Policies and Programs Study 2000 questionnaires. J Sch Health. 2003 73 : 29 37.
20. Small ML Jones SE Barrios LC, et al. School policy and environment: results from the School Health Policies and Programs Study 2000. J Sch Health. 2001 71 : 325 334.
21. Pentz MA Brannon BR Charlin VL Barrett EJ MacKinnon DP Flay BR. The power of policy: the relationship of smoking policy to adolescent smoking. Am J Public Health. 1989 79 : 857 862.
22. Muthén LK Muthén BO. Mplus Version 3. Los Angeles, Calif : Muthén and Muthén 2004.
23. Cheung GW Rensvold RB. Assessing extreme and acquiescence response sets in cross-cultural research using structural equations modeling. J Cross Cult Psychol. 2000 31 : 187 212.
24. SAS Institute. SAS/STAT Software. Version 9.0. Cary, NC : SAS Institute Inc 2002.
25. Rosendahl KI Galanti MR Gilljam H Bremberg S Ahlbom A. School and class environments are differently linked to future smoking among preadolescents. Prev Med. 2002 34 : 649 654.
26. Gilpin EA Choi WS Berry C Pierce JP. How many adolescents start smoking each day in the United States? J Adolesc Health. 1999 25 : 248 255.
27. World Health Organization. Global Status Report: Alcohol and Young People. Geneva, Switzerland : World Health Organization 2001.
28. MacKinnon CT. The politics of community participation in a public school. Educ Stud. 2000 31 : 225 248.
29. Livingood WC Woodhouse CD Sayre JJ Wludyka P. Impact study of tobacco possession law enforcement in Florida. Health Educ Behav. 2001 28 : 733 748.
30. Griesbach D Inchley J Currie C. More than words? The status and impact of smoking policies in Scottish schools. Health Promot Int. 2002 17 : 31 41.
31. Boyle RG Claxton AJ Forster JL. The role of social influences and tobacco availability on adolescent smokeless tobacco use. J Adolesc Health. 1997 20 : 279 285.
32. Midford R McBride N Munro G. Harm reduction in school drug education: developing an Australian approach. Drug Alcohol Rev. 1998 17 : 319 327.
33. Nutbeam D Smith C Moore L Bauman A. Warning! Schools can damage your health: alienation from school and its impact on health behavior. J Paediatr Child Health. 1993 29 : S25 S30.
34. Pentz MA Sussman S Newman T. The conflict between least harm and no-use tobacco policy for youth: ethical and policy implications. Addiction. 1997 92 : 1165 1173.
35. World Health Organization. Tobacco and the Rights of the Child. Geneva, Switzerland : World Health Organization 2001.