Karyometry of infiltrating breast lesions

Analytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 195-201

  Frank, Denise H ^a,b,e   Davis, John R ^a,b   Ranger Moore, James ^a,b   Liu, Yun ^a,c   Bartels, Hubert G ^a,c   Alberts, David S ^a,b   Bartels, Peter H ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Department of Medicine ^*

^c UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^d Optical Sciences Center

^e UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Karyometry; Lesion heterogeneity

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOMA; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL NUCLEUS; CHROMATIN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; HYPOTHESIS; KARYOMETRY; KRUSKAL WALLIS TEST; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CHROMATIN; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; KARYOMETRY; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS;

EID: 24144473414     PISSN: 08846812     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P: Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005;55:74-108
2. Going JJ: Stages on the way to breast cancer. J Pathol 2003; 199:1-3
3. Kenemans P, Verstraeten RA, Verheijen RH: Oncogenic pathways in hereditary and sporadic breast cancer. Maturitas 2004;49:34-43
4. Zhao H, Langerod A, Ji Y, Nowels KW, Nesland JM, Tibshirani R, Bukholm IK, Karesen R, Botstein D, Borresen-Dale AL, Jeffrey SS: Different gene expression patterns in invasive lobular and ductal carcinomas of the breast. Mol Biol Cell 2004;15:2523-2536
5. Yan L, Yang X, Davidson NE: Role of DNA methylation and histone acetylation in steroid receptor expression in breast cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2001;6:183-192
6. Frank DH, Davis JR, Alberts DS, Thompson D, Liu Y, Bartels, PH: Nuclear chromatin characteristics of breast solid pattern ductal carcinoma in situ. Analyt Quant Cytol Histol 2001;23: 418-426
7. Bloom H, Richardson W: Histological grading and prognosis in breast cancer. Br J Cancer 1957;19:359-377
8. Mommers EC, Leonhart AM, Falix F, Michalides R, Meijer CJ, Baak JP, Diest PJ: Similarity in expression of cell cycle proteins between in situ and invasive ductal breast lesions of same differentiation grade. J Pathol 2001;194:327-333
9. Wolberg WH, Street WN, Mangasarian OL: Importance of nuclear morphology in breast cancer prognosis. Clin Cancer Res 1999;5:3542-3548
10. Baak JP, Kurver PH, De Snoo-Niewlaat AJ, De Graef S, Makkink B, Boon ME: Prognostic indicators in breast cancer: Morphometric methods. Histopathology 1982;6:327-339
11. Baak JPA, Van Dop H, Durver PHA, Hermans J: The value of morphometry to classic prognosticators in breast cancer. Cancer 1985;56:372-382
12. Wittekind C, Schulte E: Computerized morphometric image analysis of cytologic nuclear parameters in breast cancer. Analyt Quant Cytol Histol 1987;9:480-484
13. Wolberg WH, Street WN: Computer-generated nuclear features compared with axillary lymph node status and tumor size as indicators of breast cancer survival. Hum Pathol 2002; 33:1086-1091
14. Wolberg WH, Street WN, Mangasarian OL: Computer-derived nuclear features compared with axillary lymph node status for breast carcinoma prognosis. Cancer 1997; 81:172-179