Comparison of subtraction arthrography, radionuclide arthrography and conventional plain radiography to assess loosening of total knee arthroplasty

Biomedizinische Technik

Volumn 50, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 143-147

  Marx, Axel ^a   Saxler, Guido ^a   Landgraeber, Stefan ^a   Löer, Franz ^a   Holland Letz, Tim ^b   Von Knoch, Marius ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

^b RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Loosening; Plain radiography; Radionuclide arthrography; Subtraction arthrography; Total knee arthroplasty (TKA)

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL ORGANS; HEALTH CARE; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); PATIENT TREATMENT; RADIOISOTOPES;

LOOSENING; PLAIN RADIOGRAPHY; RADIONUCLIDE ARTHROGRAPHY; SUBTRACTION ARTHROGRAPHY; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY (TKA);

RADIOGRAPHY;

ARTICLE; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMUR; FIXATION FAILURE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMPLANT; KNEE ARTHROGRAPHY; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RADIODIAGNOSIS; SCINTISCANNING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTHROGRAPHY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; JOINT INSTABILITY; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROGNOSIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROGRAPHY; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; JOINT INSTABILITY; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROGNOSIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 24144463958     PISSN: 00135585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/BMT.2005.021     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Barden, B.; Huttegger, C.: Failure mechanisms in total hip and knee arthroplasty: a morphologic and radiologic study. Mat.-Wiss. und Werkstofftech. 30, 746-754. 1999.
2. Cain, T. M.; Fon, G. T.; Brumby, S.; Howie, D. W.: Plain film and arthrographic findings in painful total hip arthroplasties with surgical correlation. Australas.Radiol. 34(3), 211-218. 1990.
3. Cheung, A.; Lachiewicz, P. F.; Renner, J. B.: The role of aspiration and contrast-enhanced arthrography in evaluating the uncemented hip arthroplasty. AJR Am.J.Roentgenol. 168(5), 1305-1309. 1997.
4. DeLee, J. G.; Charnley, J.: Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop. (121), 20-32. 1976.
5. Dennis, D. A.: Evaluation of painful total knee arthroplasty. J.Arthroplasty 19(4 Suppl 1), 35-40. 2004.
6. Dennis, D. A.; Komistek, R. D.; Mahfouz, M. R.: In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of fixed-bearing total knee replacements. Clin Orthop. (410), 114-130. 2003.
7. Ewald, F. C.: The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop. (248), 9-12. 1989.
8. Fehring, T. K.; McAvoy, G.: Fluoroscopic evaluation of the painful total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. (331), 226-233. 1996.
9. Ginai, A. Z.; van Biezen, F. C.; Kint, P. A.; Oei, H. Y.; Hop, W. C.: Digital subtraction arthrography in preoperative evaluation of painful total hip arthroplasty. Skeletal Radiol. 25(4), 357-363. 1996.
10. Gruen, T. A.; McNeice, G. M.; Amstutz, H. C.: "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop. (141), 17-27. 1979.
11. Hendrix, R. W.; Anderson, T. M.: Arthrographic and radiologic evaluation of prosthetic joints. Radiol.Clin North Am. 19(2), 349-364. 1981.
12. Kisielinski, K.; Cremerius, U.; Bull, U.; Hermanns, B.; Wirtz, D. C.; Niethard, F. U.: [First experiences with fluorodeoxyglucose-positron-emission tomography (FDG-PET) in the evaluation of painful total knee and hip joint replacements]. Z.Orthop.Ihre Grenzgeb. 141(2), 153-159. 2003.
13. Koster, G.; Munz, D. L.; Kohler, H. P.: Clinical value of combined contrast and radionuclide arthrography in suspected loosening of hip prostheses. Arch.Orthop.Trauma Surg 112(5), 247-254. 1993.
14. Miniaci, A.; Bailey, W. H.; Bourne, R. B.; McLaren, A. C.; Rorabeck, C. H.: Analysis of radionuclide arthrograms, radiographic arthrograms, and sequential plain radiographs in the assessment of painful hip arthroplasty. J.Arthroplasty 5(2), 143-149. 1990.
15. Seifert, J. D.; Seifert, J.; Goymann, V.; Stuckmann, B.; Patsalis, T.; Muller, R. T.: [Value of digital subtraction arthrography and radionuclide arthrography in determination of indications and planning of revision surgery in total hip replacement]. Rofo Fortschr.Geb.Rontgenstr.Neuen Bildgeb.Verfahr. 173(3), 181-186. 2001.
16. Sofka, C. M.; Potter, H. G.; Figgie, M.; Laskin, R.: Magnetic resonance imaging of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. (406), 129-135. 2003.
17. Tehranzadeh, J.; Gubernick, I.; Blaha, D.: Prospective study of sequential technetium-99m phosphate and gallium imaging in painful hip prostheses (comparison of diagnostic modalities). Clin Nucl.Med. 13(4), 229-236. 1988.
18. Temmerman, O. P.; Raijmakers, P. G.; David, E. F.; Pijpers, R.; Molenaar, M. A.; Hoekstra, O. S.; Berkhof, J.; Manoliu, R. A.; Teule, G. J.; Heyligers, I. C.: A comparison of radiographic and scintigraphic techniques to assess aseptic loosening of the acetabular component in a total hip replacement. J.Bone Joint Surg Am. 86-A(11), 2456-2463. 2004.
19. von Knoch, M.; Barden, B.; Saxler, G.; Loeer, F.: The diagnostic value of digital subtraction arthrography and radionuclide arthrography in revision total hip arthroplasty. Biomed.Technik 49, 351-355. 2004.
20. Zhuang, H.; Duarte, P. S.; Pourdehnad, M.; Maes, A.; Van Acker, F.; Shnier, D.; Garino, J. P.; Fitzgerald, R. H.; Alavi, A.: The promising role of 18F-FDG PET in detecting infected lower limb prosthesis implants. J.Nucl.Med. 42(1), 44-48. 2001.