Is outreach the answer to an "acute problem"?

Care of the Critically Ill

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 101-102

  Holder, Paul ^a   Cuthbertson, Brian H ^b  

^a ABERDEEN ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUSTRALIA; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DETERIORATION; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; EDITORIAL; EDUCATION PROGRAM; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STAFF; OUTREACH CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROGNOSIS; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 24144462538     PISSN: 02660970     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Editorial

References (5)

1. Department of Health. Comprehensive critical care. A review of adult critical care services. London: Department of health, 2000.
2. Hilman K et al.Introduction of the medical emergency team (MET) system:a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005;365: 209-197.
3. NCEPOD An acute problem? 2005 http://www.ncepod.org.uk/2005.htm.
4. Rivers E et al. Early Goal-Directed Therapy in the Treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock. NEJM 2001;345(19):1368-77.
5. Dellinger et al. Surviving sepsis campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med 2004;32(3):858-73.