Accounting for the performance of students with disabilities on statewide assessments

Journal of Special Education

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 86-96

  Malmgren, Kimber W ^a   McLaughlin, Margaret J ^b   Nolet, Victor ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^c WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24144458989     PISSN: 00224669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00224669050390020401     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Alspaugh, J. W., & Gao, R. (2003). School size as a factor in elementary school achievement. Columbia: University of Missouri. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED475062)
2. Borland, M. V., & Howsen, R. M. (2003). An examination of the effect of elementary school size on student academic achievement. International Review of Education, 49, 463-474.
3. Caldas, S. J., & Bankston, C., III. (1997). Effects of school population so cioeconomic status on individual academic achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 90, 269-277.
4. Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching. New York: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
5. Driscoll, D., Halcoussis, D., & Svorny, S. (2003). School district size and student performance. Economics of Education Review, 22, 193-201.
6. Elliott, J. L., Erickson, R., Thurlow, M., & Shriner, J. (2000). State-level accountability for the performance of students with disabilities: Five years of change? The Journal of Special Education, 34, 39-47.
7. Goertz, M. E. (2001). Standards-based accountability: Horse trade or horse whip? In S. Fuhrman (Ed.), From the capital to the classroom: Standards-based reform in the states (One hundredth yearbook of the National Society of the Study of Education, pp. 39-59). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Goldring, E. B., & Shapira, R. (1996). Principals' survival with parental involvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7, 342-360.
9. Ho, S., & Willms, J. D. (1996). Effects of parental involvement on eighth-grade achievement. Sociology of Education, 69, 126-141.
10. Ma, X., & Klinger, D. A. (2000). Hierarchical linear modeling of student and school effects on academic achievement. Canadian Journal of Education, 25(1), 41-55.
11. McLaughlin, M. J., & Thurlow, M. (2003). Educational accountability and students with disabilities: Issues and challanges. Educational Policy, 17, 431-451.
12. Namboodiri, K., Corwin, R. G., & Dorsten, L. E. (1993). Analyzing distributions in school effects research: An empirical illustration. Sociology of Education, 66, 278-294.
13. The No Child Left Behind Act. (2001). Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
14. Quality counts: Special education in an era of standards. (2004, January 8). Education Week, 23(17).
15. Skrla, L., Scheurich, J. J., Johnson, J. F., & Koschoreck, J. W. (2001). Accountability for equity: Can state policy leverage social justice? International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4, 237-260.
16. Thurlow, M., Lazarus, S., Thompson, S., & Robey, J. (2002). 2007 state policies on assessment participation and accommodations (Synthesis Report 46). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
17. U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Twenty-fourth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.