Constructing, bootstrapping, and comparing morphometric and phylogenetic trees: A case study of new world monkeys (Platyrrhini, Primates)

Journal of Mammalogy

Volumn 86, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 773-781

  Couette, Sébastien ^a   Escarguel, Gilles ^b   Montuire, Sophie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

Author keywords

Dissimilarity matrices; Morphometric tree; Platyrrhines; Signal comparison

Indexed keywords

BOOTSTRAPPING; MORPHOMETRY; PHYLOGENETICS; PRIMATE;

PLATYRRHINI; PRIMATES;

EID: 24144453416     PISSN: 00222372     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1644/1545-1542(2005)086[0773:CBACMA]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. AUFFRAY, J. C., P. ALIBERT, S. RENAUD, A. ORTH, AND F. BONHOMME. 1996. Fluctuating asymmetry in Mus musculus subspecific hybridization: traditional and Procrustes comparative approach. Pp. 275-284 in Advances in Morphometrics (L. F. Marcus, M. Corti, A. Loy, G. J. P. Naylor, and D. E. Slice, eds.). Plenum Press, New York.
2. BARTÉLÉMY, J. P., AND A. GUÉNOCHE. 1991. Trees and proximities representations. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
3. BAYLAC, M., AND T. DAUFRESNE. 1996. Wing venation variability in Monarthropalpus buxi (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae) and the Quaternary coevolution of box (Buxus sempervirens L.) and its midge: a geometrical morphometric analysis. Pp. 285-302 in Advances in morphometrics (L. F. Marcus, M. Corti, A. Loy, G. J. P. Naylor, and D. E. Slice, eds.). Plenum Press, New York.
4. BERGE, C. 1996. The evolution and growth of the hominoid pelvis: a preliminary thin-plate spline study of ilium shape. Pp. 441-448 in Advances in morphometrics (L. F. Marcus, M. Corti, A. Loy, G. J. P. Naylor, and D. E. Slice, eds.). Plenum Press, New York.
5. BERRY, V., AND O. GASCUEL. 1997. Inferring evolutionary trees with strong combinatorial confidence. Pp. 111-123 in Proceedings of the 3rd Annual International Computing and Combinatorics Conference (T. Jiang, ed.). LNCS, Springer-Verlag, New York.
6. BERRY, V., O. GASCUEL, AND G. CARAUX. 2000. Choosing the tree which actually best explains the data: another look at the bootstrap in phylogenetic reconstruction. Computer Statistics and Data Analysis 38:273-283.
7. BLANKEN, R. L., L. C. KLOTZ, AND A. G. HINNEBUSH. 1982. Computer comparison of a new and existing criteria for constructing evolutionary trees from sequence data. Journal of Molecular Evolution 19:9-19.
8. BONNET, E., AND Y. VAN DE PEER. 2001. zt: a software tool for simple and partial Mantel tests. Journal of Statistical Software 7:1-12.
9. BOOKSTEIN, F. L. 1984. A statistical method for biological comparisons. Journal of Theoretical Biology 107:475-520.
10. BOOKSTEIN, F. L. 1986. Size and shape spaces for landmark data in two dimensions. Statistical Science 1:181-242.
11. BOOKSTEIN, F. L. 1989. "Size and shape": a comment on semantics. Systematic Zoology 38:173-180.
12. BOOKSTEIN, F. L. 1991. Morphometric tools for landmarks data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
13. BOOKSTEIN, F. L. 1996. Combining the tools of geometric morphometrics. Pp. 131-152 in Advances in Morphometrics (L. F. Marcus, M. Corti, A. Loy, G. J. P. Naylor, and D. E. Slice, eds.). Plenum Press, New York.
14. BUNYARD, B. A., M. S. NICHOLSON, AND D. J. ROYSE. 1996. Phylogeny of the genus Agaricus inferred from restriction analysis of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA. Fungal Genetics and Biology 20:243-253.
15. CANAVEZ, F. G., G. ALVES, T. G. FANNING, AND H. N. SEUÁNEZ. 1996. Comparative karyology and evolution of the Amazonian Callithrix (Platyrrhini, Primates). Chromosoma 104:348-357.
16. CASTRO, H. F., N. H. WILLIAMS, AND A. OGRAM. 2000. Phylogeny of sulfate-reducing bacteria. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 31:1-9.
17. CAVALLI-SFORZA, L. L., AND A. W. F. EDWARDS. 1967. Phylogenetic analysis: models and estimation procedures. Evolution 32:550-570.
18. COIMBRA-FILHO, A. F., A. PISSINATTI, AND A. B. RYLANDS. 1993. Experimental multiple hybridism and natural hybrids among Callithrix species from eastern Brazil. Pp. 95-120 in Marmosets and tamarins, systematics, behaviour and ecology (A. B. Rylands, ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
19. CORTI, M. 1993. Geometric morphometrics: an extension of the revolution. Tree 8:302-303.
20. D'ARCY THOMPSON. 1915. Morphology and mathematics. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh-Earth Sciences L:857-895.
21. DE QUEIROZ, A., M. J. DONOGUE, AND J. KIM. 1995. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26:657-681.
22. DE SOUSA E SILVA, J., JR., AND M. DE ALMEIDA NURONHA. 1998. On a new species of bare-eared marmosets, genus Callithrix Erxleben, 1777, from central Amazonia, Brazil (Primates: Callithrichidae). Goeldiana Zoologia 21:1-28.
23. DE SOUZA BARROS, R. M., C. Y. NAGAMACHI, AND J. C. PIECZARKA. 1990. Chromosomal evolution in Callithrix emiliae. Chromosoma 99:440-447.
24. EFRON, B. 1979. Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Annals of Statistics 7:1-26.
25. EFRON, B. 1982. The jackknife, the bootstrap and other resampling plans. CBMS Monograph. CBMS, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
26. EFRON, B., E. HALLORAN, AND S. HOLMES. 1995. Bootstrap confidence levels for phylogenetic trees. Standford University, Technical Report 179.
27. FARRIS, J. S. 1981. Distance data in phylogenetic analysis. Pp. 3-23 in Advances in cladistics, proceedings of the first meeting of the Willi Hennig Society (D. R. Brooks, ed.). New York Botanical Garden, New York.
28. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1984. Distance methods for inferring phylogenies: a justification. Evolution 38:16-24.
29. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
30. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1993. PHYLIP. Version 3. 5c. University of Washington, Seattle.
31. FELSENSTEIN, J., AND H. KISHINO. 1993. Is there something wrong with the bootstrap on phylogenies? a reply to Hillis and Bull. Systematic Biology 42:193-200.
32. FITCH, W. M., AND E. MARGOLIASH. 1967. Construction of phylogenetic trees. Science 155:279-284.
33. FLEAGLE, J. G. 1978. Size distributions of living and fossil primate faunas. Paleobiology 4:67-76.
34. FORD, S. M., AND L. C. DAVIS. 1992. Systematics and body size: implications for feeding adaptations in New World monkeys. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 88:415-468.
35. GARBER, P. A. 1992. Vertical clinging, small body size, and the evolution of feeding adaptations in the Callithrichinae. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 88:469-482.
36. GASCUEL, O., AND D. LEVY. 1996. A reduction algorithm for approximating a (non-metric) dissimilarity by a tree distance. Journal of Classification 13:129-155.
37. GOODALL, C. 1991. Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. Royal Statistical Society 53:285-339.
38. GOODMAN, M., ET AL. 1998. Toward a phylogenetic classification of primates based on DNA evidence complemented by fossil evidence. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 9:585-598.
39. GOWER, J. C. 1975. Generalized Procrustes analysis. Psychometrika 40:33-51.
40. GRAHAM, A. 2000. Animal phylogeny: root and branch surgery. Current Biology 10:R36-R38.
41. GROVES, C. P. 2001. Primate taxonomy. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
42. HERSHKOVITZ, P. 1977. Living New World monkeys (Platyrrhini), with an introduction to primates. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
43. HILLIS, D. M., AND J. J. BULL. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 42:182-192.
44. HOROVITZ, I., AND A. MEYER. 1995. Systematics of New World monkeys (Platyrrhini, Primates) based on 16S mitochondrial DNA sequences: a comparative analysis of different weighting methods in cladistic analysis. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 4:448-456.
45. HUELSENBECK, J. 1995. The robustness of two phylogenetic methods: four-taxon simulations reveal a slight superiority of maximum likelihood over neighbor joining. Molecular Biology and Evolution 12:843-849.
46. HUGOTAND, J. P. 1996. Comparative landmark analysis of various Oxyuridae parasites of primates and rodents: patterns of variation seen in the caudal bursa of males. Pp. 463-478 in Advances in morphometrics (L. F. Marcus, M. Corti, A. Loy, G. J. P. Naylor, and D. E. Slice, eds.). Plenum Press, New York.
47. KAWAMURA, S., M. HIRAI, O. TAKENAKA, F. B. RADLWIMMER, AND S. YOKOYAMA. 2001. Genomic and spectral analyses of long to middle wavelength-sensitive visual pigments of common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Gene 269:45-51.
48. KENDALL, D. G. 1989. A survey of the statistical theory of shape. Statistical Science 4:87-120.
49. KID, K., AND L. SGAMARELLA-ZONTA. 1971. Phylogenetic analysis: concepts and methods. American Journal of Human Genetics 23:235-252.
50. KRUSKAL, J. B. 1964. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a non-rnetric hypothesis. Psychometrika 29:1-27.
51. LAPOINTE, F.-J., AND P. LEGENDRE. 1992. A statistical framework to test the consensus among additive trees (cladograms). Systematic Biology 41:158-171.
52. LE CALVÉ, G. 1985. Distances à centre. Statistique et Analyse des Données 10:29-44.
53. LEVASSEUR, C., AND F.-J. LAPOINTE. 2001. War and peace in phylogenetics: a rejoinder on total evidence and consensus. Systematic Biology 50:881-891.
54. MEAD, A. 1992. Review of the development of multidimensional scaling methods. Statistician 41:27-39.
55. MITTERMEIER, R. A., A. B. RYLANDS, AND A. COIMBRA-FILHO. 1988. Systematics: species and subspecies - an update. Pp. 13-75 in Ecology and behavior of neotropical primates (R. A. Mittermeier, A. B. Rylands, and A. Coimbra-Filho, eds.). World Wildlife Fund, Washington, D.C.
56. MITTERMEIER, R. A., M. SCHWARTZ, AND J. M. AYRES. 1992. A new species of marmoset, genus Callithrix Erxleben, 1777 (Callithrichidae, Primates) from the Rio Maués, state of Amazonas, central Brazilian Amazonia. Goeldiana Zoologia 14:1-17.
57. MUSKIN, A. 1984. Field notes and geographic distribution of Callithrix aurita in eastern Brazil. American Journal of Primatology 7:377-380.
58. NASH, L. T. 1986. Dietary, behavorial, and morphological aspects of gummivory. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 29:113-137.
59. NATORI, M. 1986. Interspecific relationships of Callithrix based on the dental characters. Primates 27:321-336.
60. NATORI, M. 1990. Numerical analysis of the taxonomical status of Callithrix kuhlii based on measurements of the postcanine dentition. Primates 31:555-562.
61. PAGE, R. D. M. 2000. Extracting species trees from complex gene trees: reconciled trees and vertebrate phylogeny. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 14:89-106.
62. PIECZARKA, J. C., C. Y. NAGAMACHI, R. M. DE SOUZA BARROS, AND M. S. MATTEVI. 1996. Analysis of constitutive heterochromatin by fluochromes and in situ digestion with restriction enzymes in species of the group Callithrix argentata (Callithrichidae, Primates). Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics 72:325-330.
63. POWER, M. L. 1996. The other side of callithrichine gummivory. Pp. 97-110 in Adaptive radiations of neotropical primates (M. A. Norconk, A. L. Rosenberger, and P. A. Garber, eds.). Plenum Press, New York.
64. RICHTSMEIER, J. T., V. BURKE DELEON, AND S. R. LELE. 2002. The promise of geometric morphometrics. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 45:63-91.
65. ROHLF, F. J. 1996. Morphometric spaces, shape components and the effects of linear transformations. Pp. 117-129 in Advances in morphometrics (L. F. Marcus, M. Corti, A. Loy, G. J. P. Naylor, and D. E. Slice, eds.). Plenum, New York.
66. ROHLF, F. J. 1999. Shape statistic: Procrustes superimpositions and tangent spaces. Journal of Classification 16:197-223.
67. ROHLF, F. J., AND L. F. MARCUS. 1993. A revolution in morphometrics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8:129-132,
68. ROHLF, F. J., AND R. R. SOKAL. 1981. Comparing numerical taxonomic studies. Systematic Zoology 30:459-490.
69. ROSENBERGER, A. L. 1978. Loss of incisor enamel in marmosets. Journal of Mammalogy 59:207-208.
70. RYDIN, C., AND M. KALLERSJO. 2002. Taxon sampling and seed plant phylogeny. Cladistics 18:485-513.
71. RYLANDS, A. B. 1986. Ranging behaviour and habitat preference of a wild marmoset group Callithrix humerlifer (Callithrichidae, Primates). Journal of Zoology (London) 210:489-514.
72. RYLANDS, A. B., A. F. COIMBRA-FILHO, AND R. A. MITTERMEIER. 1993. Systematics, geographic distribution, and some notes on the conservation status of the Callitrichidae. Pp. 11-77 in Marmosets and tamarins, systematics, behaviour and ecology (A. B. Rylands, ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
73. RYLANDS, A. B., AND D. S. FARIA. 1993. Habits, feeding ecology, and home range size in the genus Callithrix. Pp. 262-269 in Marmosets and tamarins, systematics, behaviour and ecology (A. B. Rylands, ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
74. RZHETSKY, A., AND M. NEI. 1992. Statistical properties of the ordinary least-squares, generalized least-squares, and minimum-evolution of phylogenetic inference. Journal of Molecular Evolution 35:367-375.
75. SAITOU, N., AND M. NEI. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for constructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology Evolution 4:406-425.
76. SCHNEIDER, H., ET AL. 1996. Molecular phylogeny of the New World monkeys (Platyrhini, Primates) based on two unlinked nuclear genes: IRBP intron 1 and E-globin sequences. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 100:153-179.
77. SCHNEIDER, H., ET AL. 1993. Molecular phylogeny of the New World monkeys (Platyrrhini, Primates). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2:225-242.
78. SHOSHANI, J., C. P. GROVES, E. L. SIMONS, AND G. F. GUNNELL. 1996. Primate phylogeny: morphological vs molecular results. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 5:102-154.
79. SLICE, D. E. 1996. Introduction to landmark methods. Pp. 113-116 in Advances in morphometrics (L. F. Marcus, M. Corti, A. Loy, G. J. P. Naylor, and D. E. Slice, eds.). Plenum Press, New York.
80. SNEATH, P. H. A., AND R. R. SOKAL. 1973. Numerical taxonomy. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, California.
81. SOINI, P. 1982. Ecology and population dynamics of the pygmy marmoset, Cebuella pygmaea. Folia Primatologica 39:1-21.
82. SOINI, P. 1988. The pygmy marmoset, genus Cebitella. Pp. 79-129 in Ecology and behavior of neotropical primates (R. A. Mittermeier, A. B. Rylands, and A. Coimbra-Filho, eds.). World Wildlife Fund, Washington, D.C.
83. SOKAL, R. R., AND P. H. A. SNEATH. 1963. Principles of numerical taxonomy. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, California.
84. STEVENSON, M. F., AND A. B. RYLANDS. 1988. The marmoset, genus Callithrix. Pp. 131-222 in Ecology and behavior of neotropical primates (R. A. Mittermeier, A. B. Rylands, and A. Coimbra-Filho, eds.). World Wildlife Fund, Washington, D.C.
85. SUSSMAN, R. W., AND W. G. KINZEY. 1984. The ecological role of the Callitrichidae: a review. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 64:419-449.
86. TAGLIARO, C. H., M. P. C. SCHNEIDER, H. SCHNEIDER, M. I. C. SAMPAIO, AND M. J. STANHOPE. 1997. Marmoset phylogenetics, conservation perspectives, and evolution of the mtDNA control region. Molecular Biology and Evolution 14:674-684.
87. TANETO, Y., M. NEI, AND F. TAJIMA. 1982. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. I. Distantly related species. Journal of Molecular Evolution 18:387-404.
88. VAN ROOSMALEN, M. G. M., AND T. VAN ROOSMALEN. 2003. The description of a new genus, Callibella (Callitrichinae, Primates), including its molecular phylogenetic status. Neotropical Primates 11:1-11.
89. VAN ROOSMALEN, M. G. M., T. VAN ROOSMALEN, R. A. MITTERMEIER, AND A. B. RYLANDS. 2000. Two new species of marmoset, genus Callithrix Erxleben, 1777 (Callithrichidae, Primates) from the Tapajós/Madeira Interfluvium, south central Amazonia, Brazil. Neotropical Primates 8:2-18.
90. WAHLBERG, N., AND S. NYLIN. 2003. Morphology versus molecules: resolution of the positions of Nymphalis, Polygonia, and related genera (Lepidoptera: Nyphalidae). Cladistics 19:213-223.
91. WOOD, C. G., AND J. M. LYNCH. 1996. Sexual dimorphism in craniofacial skeleton of modern humans. Pp. 407-414 in Advances in morphometrics (L. F. Marcus, M. Corti, A. Loy, G. J. P. Naylor, and D. E. Slice, eds.). Plenum Press, New York.
92. ZHARKIKH, A., AND W.-H. LI. 1995. Estimation of confidence in phylogeny: the complete-and-partial bootstrap technique. Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution 4:44-63.