An analysis of the determinants of internet access

Telecommunications Policy

Volumn 29, Issue 9-10, 2005, Pages 731-755

  Chaudhuri, Anindya ^a   Flamm, Kenneth S ^a   Horrigan, John ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b Pew Internet and American Life Project   (United States)

Author keywords

Access; Digital divide; Internet; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

COSTS; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; EDUCATION; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS;

ACCESS; DIGITAL DIVIDE; SUBSCRIPTION; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY;

INTERNET;

EID: 24144438592     PISSN: 03085961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2005.07.001     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. S. Berry, J. Levinsohn, and A. Pakes Automobile Prices in Market Equilibrium Econometrica 63 1995 841 890
2. Chaudhuri, A., Flamm, K. (2005). An analysis of the determinants of broadband access. Working paper. Presented at the future of broadband: Wired & wireless? Conference sponsored by the Public Utility Research Center of the University of Florida and the London Business School Global Communications Consortium, February 24-25, Gainesville, Florida. Available at http://bear.cba.ufl.edu/centers/purc/documents/Chaudhuri.pdf. Accessed on 03/15/05.
3. Gillett, S. (1999). Universal service: Defining the policy goal in the age of the internet. http://itel.mit.edu:/itel/docs/MISC/Gillett_Universal.html, accessed 4/26/03.
4. Goldfarb, A. (2005). The (teaching) role of Universities in the diffusion of the internet. http://www.rotman.utoronto.ca/~agoldfarb/ universities%20and%20adoption.pdf accessed on 3/17/05.
5. Horrigan, J. (2002). The broadband difference: How online Americans' behavior changes with high-speed Internet connections at home. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/ toc.asp?Report=63.
6. D.J. Kridel, P. Rappoport, and Taylor An econometric study of the demand for access to the internet D.G. Loomis L.D. Taylor The Future of the telecommunications industry: Forecasting and demand analysis 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht
7. Leigh, A., Atkinson, R. (2001). Clear thinking on the digital divide. http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~.leighan.students.ksg/Subpages/pdfs/ Digital%20divide%20report%20PPI.pdf, accessed 4/26/03.
8. Lenhart, A. (2003). The ever-shifting internet population: A new look at internet access and the digital divide. April. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=88.
9. National Telecommunications and Information Administration reports. (1995, 1998, 1999, 2000). Falling through the net. http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ ntiahome/digitaldivide, accessed 4/26/03.
10. National Telecommunications and Information Administration report. (2002). A nation online: How Americans are expanding their use of the internet. http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/dn/anationonline2.pdf, accessed 4/26/03.
11. Novak, T., Hoffman, D. (1998). Bringing the digital divide: The impact of race on computer access and internet use. http://elab.vanderbilt.edu/research/ papers/html/manuscripts/race/science.html, accessed 4/26/03.
12. J. Schement Of gaps by which democracy we measure B.M. Compaine The digital divide: Facing a crisis or creating a myth 2001 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
13. The UCLA Internet Report. (2000). Surveying the digital future. http://ccp.ucla.edu/UCLA-Internet-Report-2000.pdf, accessed 4/26/03.
14. US General Accounting Office report. (2001). Characteristics and choices of internet users. 2001. http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d01345.pdf, accessed 4/26/03.