Inherent limitations of visual search and the role of inner-scene similarity

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Volumn 3368, Issue , 2005, Pages 16-28

  Avraham, Tamar ^a   Lindenbaum, Michael ^a  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTER VISION; INFORMATION ANALYSIS;

INNER-SCENE OBJECTS; METRIC SPACES; PREDICTORS; VISUAL SEARCH;

OBJECT RECOGNITION;

EID: 24144433833     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30572-9_2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. T. Avraham and M. Lindenbaum. Dynamic visual search using inner scene similarity-algorithms and bounds. Technion. Computer Science Departement. Technical Report CIS-2003-02, May 2003.
2. T. Avraham and M. Lindenbaum. A probabilistic estimation approach for dynamic visual search. In Proceedings of WAPCV03 - First International Workshop on Attention and Performance in Computer Vision, pages 1-8, April 2003.
3. T. Avraham and M. Lindenbaum. Dynamic visual search using inner scene similarity - algorithms and inherent limitations. In Proceedings of ECCV04 - The 8th European Conference on Computer Vision,LNCS 3022:pages 58-70, May 2004.
4. B. Bauer, P. Jolicoeur, and W. B. Cowan. Visual search for colour targets that are or are not linearly separable from distractors. Vision Research, 36:1439-1465, 1996.
5. J. Duncan and G.W. Humphreys. Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96:433-458, 1989.
6. T.F. Gonzalez. Clustering to minimize the maximum intercluster distance. Theoretical Computer Science, 38(2-3):293-306, June 1985.
7. G.W. Humphreys and H.J. Muller. Search via recursive rejection (serr): A connectionist model of visual search. Cognitive Psychology, 25:43-110, 1993.
8. L. Itti. Models of bottom-up and top-down visual attention. Thesis, January 2000.
9. L. Itti, C. Koch, and E. Niebur. A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. PAMI, 20(11): 1254-1259, November 1998.
10. C. Koch and S. Ullman. Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural vircuity. Human Neurobiology, 4:219-227, 1985.
11. A.N. Kolmogorov and V.M. Tikhomirov. epszlon-entropy and epsilon-capacity of sets in functional spaces. AMS Translations. Series 2, 17:277-364, 1961.
12. D. Martin, C. Fowlkes, D. Tal, and J. Malik. A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecological statistics. In Proc. 8th Int'l Conf. Computer Vision, volume 2, pages 416-423, July 2001.
13. U. Neisser. Cognitive Psychology. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1967.
14. S. Nene, S.Nayar, and H. Murase. Columbia object image library (coil-100). Technical Report CUCS-006-96, Department of Computer Science, Columbia University, February 1996.
15. R.P.N. Rao and D.H. Ballard. An active vision architecture based on iconic representations. Artificial Intelligence, 78(1-2):461-505, 1995.
16. R.D. Rimey and C.M. Brown. Control of selective perception using bayes nets and decision theory. Intemational Journal of Computer Vision, 12:173-207, 1994.
17. R. Rosenholtz. A simple saliency model predicts a number of motion popout phenomena. Vision Research, 39:3157-3163, 1999.
18. M.J. Swain and D.H. Ballard. Color indexing. International Journal of Computer Vision, 7:11-32, 1991.
19. H. Tagare, K. Toyaraa, and J.G. Wang. A maximum-likelihood strategy for directing attention during visual search. IEEE PAMI, 23(5):490-500, 2001.
20. A. Torralba and P. Sinha. Statistical context priming for object detection. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference On Computer Vision, pages 763-770, 2001.
21. A. Treisman and G.Gelade. A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12:97-136, 1980.
22. J.K. Tsotsos. On the relative complexity of active versus passive visual search. IJCV,7(2):121-141, 1992.
23. J.K. Tsotsos, S.M. Culhane, W.Y.K. Wai, Y. Lai, N. Davis, and F.J. Nuflo. Modeling visual attention via selective tuning. Artificial intelligence, 78(1-2):507-545, 1995.
24. L.E. Wixson and D.H. Ballard. Using intermediate objects to improve the efficiency of visual-search. IJCV, 12(2-3):209-230, April 1994.
25. J.M. Wolfe. Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1(2):202-238, 1994.
26. A.L. Yarbus. Eye Movements and Vision. Plenum Press, New York, 1967.