Crash caesarean section - Decision-to-delivery interval

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 84, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 914-915

  Kwek, Kenneth ^a   Yeap, Min Li ^a   Tan, K H ^a   Tee, John C S ^a   Yeo, George S H ^a  

^a KK WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Crash caesarean section; Delivery interval

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRADYCARDIA; CESAREAN SECTION; DELIVERY; EMERGENCY WARD; FEVER; HEMOSTASIS; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROTOMY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MORTALITY; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT TRANSPORT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; URINARY URGENCY; UTERUS RUPTURE;

CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; EMERGENCIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT MORTALITY; INFANT, NEWBORN; OBSTETRIC LABOR COMPLICATIONS; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PREGNANCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SINGAPORE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 24044544579     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00816.x     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Leung AS, Leung EK, Paul RH. Uterine rupture after previous cesarean delivery: maternal and fetal consequences. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 945-50.
2. Helmy WH, Jolaoso AS, Ifaturoti OO, Afify SA, Jones MH. The decision-to-delivery interval for emergency caesarean section: is 30 minutes a realistic target? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 109: 505-8.
3. Chauhan SP, Magann EF, Scott JR, Scardo JA, Hendrix NW, Martin JN Jr. Emergency cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracings. Compliance with ACOG guidelines. J Reprod Med 2003; 48: 975-81.
4. Sayegh I, Dupuis O, Clement HJ, Rudigoz RC. Evaluating the decision-to-delivery interval in emergency caesarean sections. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004; 116: 28-33.