Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open aneurysm repair: Comparison of treatment outcome and procedure-related reintervention rate

Annals of Vascular Surgery

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 699-704

  Aarts, F ^a   Van Sterkenburg, S ^b   Blankensteijn, J D ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b RIJNSTATE HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANEURYSM; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTERY DISEASE; ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DEMOGRAPHY; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMATOMA; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INFECTION RATE; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; LENGTH OF STAY; LUNG INFECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

EID: 24044542987     PISSN: 08905096     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10016-005-6861-1     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Ruiz C, Zhang HP. A novel method for treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms using percutaneous implantation of a newly designed endovascular device. Circulation 1995;91:2470-2477.
2. Petrasek PF, White GH, May J. Novel aortic reconstruction strategies: endovascular aneurysm repair. Curr Intervent Cardiol Rep 1999;1:205-214.
3. Ailawadi G, Eliason J. Current concepts in the pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2003;38:584-588.
4. Lederle F, Johnson G, Wilson S, et al. Rupture rate of large abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients refusing or unfit for elective repair. J.A.M.A. 2002;287:2968-2972.
5. United Kingdom Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Long-term outcomes of immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1445-1452.
6. Parodi JC, Palmaz JC. Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 1991;5:491-499.
7. Elkouri S, Gloviczki P, McKusick MA, et al. Perioperative complications and early outcome after endovascular and open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2004;39:497-505.
8. Lee WA, Carter JW, Upchurch G, et al. Perioperative outcomes after open and endovascular repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States during 2001. J Vasc Surg 2004;39:491-496.
9. Wolf YG, Arko FR, Hill BB, et al. Gender differences in endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with the AneuRx stent graft. J Vasc Surg 2002;35:882-886.
10. Katz DJ, Stanley JC, Zelenock GB, et al. Gender differences in abdominal aortic aneurysm prevalence, treatment, and outcome. J Vasc Surg 1997;25:561-568.
11. Becquemin J, Kelley L, Zubilewicz T, et al. Outcomes of secondary interventions after abdominal aortic aneurysm endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg 2004;39:298-305.
12. May J, White G, Waugh R, et al. Adverse events after endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a comparison during two successive periods of time. J Vasc Surg 1999;29:32-37.
13. Arko F, Filis K, Hill BB, et al. Morphologic changes and outcome following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair as a function of aneurysm size. Arch Surg 2003;138:651-656.
14. Zarins CK, Bloch DA, Crabtree T, et al. Aneurysm enlargement following endovascular aneurysm repair: AneuRx clinical trial. J Vasc Surg 2004;39:109-117.
15. Terramani T, Chaikof EL, Rayan SS, et al. Secondary conversion due to failed endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2003;38:473-478.
16. Steinmetz E, Rubin B, Sanchez LA, et al. Type II endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a conservative approach with selective intervention is safe and cost-effective. J Vasc Surg 2004;39:306-313.
17. Peppelenbosch N, Buth J, Harris PL, et al. Diameter of abdominal aortic aneurysm and outcome of endovascular aneurysm repair: does size matter? A report from Eurostar. J Vasc Surg 2004;39:288-297.
18. Ouriel K, Clair DG, Greenberg RK, et al. Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: device-specific outcome. J Vasc Surg 2003;37:991-998.