The effect of different feedback models on acquisition and retention of technique in basketball

Journal of Human Movement Studies

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 163-181

  Tzetzis, G ^a   Kioumourtzoglou, E ^a   Laios, A ^a   Stergiou, N ^a  

^a DEMOCRITUS UNIVERSITY OF THRACE   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24044528922     PISSN: 03067297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. ABERNETHV, B. (1993). Attention. In Handbook of research in sport psychology. (Edited by N. R. Singer, M. Murphey & L. K. Tennant) New York: Mcmillan, pp.127-170.
2. ADAMS, J. A. (1971). A closed loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3: 111-150.
3. BANGERT-DROWNS, R. L., KULIL, C-L. C., KULIK, J. A. AND MORGAN, M. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test like-events. Review of Educational Research, 61: 213-238.
4. BROPHY, J. E. AND GOOD, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). (Edited by M. C. Wittrock) New York: Mcmillan, pp.123- 147.
5. Boss, K. (1988). Heidelberg basketball test. Leistungs Sport, 2: 17.
6. CEVRONE, D., JIWANI, N. and WOOD, R. (1991). Goal setting and differential influence of self regulatory process on complex decision making performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61: 257-266.
7. COOPER, L. K. and ROTHSTEIN, A. L. (1981). Video-tape replay and the learning of skills in open and closed environments. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 52: 191-199.
8. DEL REY, P. (1971). The effects of video taped feedback on form accuracy and latency in an open and closed environment. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3: 281-287.
9. EARLY, CH. and LITUCY, T. (1991). Delineating goal and efficacy effects: a test of three models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 81-98.
10. FLACH, J. M., LINTERN, G. and LARISH, J. F. (1990). Perceptual motor skill: A theoretical framework. In The perception and control of self motion. (R. Warren & A. H. Wertheim) Hillsdale, NJ: Elbaum, pp.327-355.
11. GENTILE, A. M. (1972). A working model of skill acquisition with application to teaching. Quest, 17: 3-23.
12. HALL, K. H., WEINBERG R. S. and JACKSON, A. (1987). The effects of goal specificity, goal difficulty and information feedback on endurance performance. Journal of Sport Psychology, 9: 43-54.
13. KLUGER, A. N. and DENISI, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis and preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119: 254-284.
14. LANDERS, D. M. and BUTCHER, S. H. (1986). Arousal performance relationships. In Applied sport psychology: personal growth to peak performance. (Edited by J. M. Williams) Palo Alto: CA, pp.163-184.
15. LANDIN, K. D. and CUTTON, M. D. (1990). The effects of alternating feedback treatments on motor skill acquisition. College Student Journal, 24: 261-265.
16. LEE, A. M., KEH, N. C. and MAGILL, R. A. (1993). Instructional effects of teacher feedback in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 12: 228-243.
17. LOCKE, E. (1968). Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organization Behavior and Human Performance, 5: 157-189.
18. LOCKE, E. and LATHAM, G. P. (1985). The application of goal setting to sports. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7: 205-222.
19. LOCKE, E. (1991). Problems with goal setting research in sport and their solutions. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 13: 311-316.
20. MAGILL, R. A. (1992). Motor learning: Concepts and applications (4th ed.). Dubuque, IA: Brown & Benchmark.