|
|
Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 57-70
|
|
Role conflict: appropriateness of a nurse researcher's actions in the clinical field.
a
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
AUSTRALIA;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONFIDENTIALITY;
CONFLICT;
EDUCATION;
EMPIRICAL APPROACH;
ETHICS;
FEMALE;
HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE;
HEALTH SERVICE;
HUMAN;
INFORMED CONSENT;
MALE;
METHODOLOGY;
MODEL;
NURSE ADMINISTRATOR;
NURSE ATTITUDE;
NURSING;
NURSING EDUCATION;
NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH;
NURSING STAFF;
ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;
PATIENT ADVOCACY;
PERSONNEL;
PHILOSOPHY;
PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE;
PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE;
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;
QUESTIONNAIRE;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
EMPIRICAL APPROACH;
ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL;
AUSTRALIA;
CLINICAL TRIALS;
CONFIDENTIALITY;
CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY);
FACULTY, NURSING;
FEMALE;
HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND;
HUMANS;
INFORMED CONSENT;
MALE;
MODELS, NURSING;
NURSE ADMINISTRATORS;
NURSE'S ROLE;
NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH;
NURSING STAFF;
PATIENT ADVOCACY;
PHILOSOPHY, NURSING;
PROFESSIONAL AUTONOMY;
PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE;
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;
QUESTIONNAIRES;
RESEARCH DESIGN;
RESEARCH PERSONNEL;
|
|
EID: 24044520399
PISSN: 13515578
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.7748/nr2005.04.12.4.57.c5959 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (16)
|
|
References (0)
|
