Prospective analysis of outcomes after microsurgical intussusception vasoepididymostomy

BJU International

Volumn 96, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 598-601

  Chan, Peter T K ^a   Brandell, Roy A ^b   Goldstein, Marc ^b,c  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^c Box 580 ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Azoospermia; Infertility; Microsurgery; Vasectomy reversal; Vasoepididymostomy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AZOOSPERMIA; EPIDIDYMIS DISEASE; EPIDIDYMIS OBSTRUCTION; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IATROGENIC DISEASE; IDIOPATHIC DISEASE; INFECTION; INJURY; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; INTUSSUSCEPTION VASOEPIDIDYMOSTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MICROSURGERY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATERNITY; PLASTIC SURGERY; PREGNANCY RATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SOLITARY TESTIS; SPERMATOZOON COUNT; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY; TESTIS DISEASE; TREATMENT FAILURE; VASECTOMY;

ADULT; EPIDIDYMIS; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL ILLUSTRATION; MICROSURGERY; MIDDLE AGED; OLIGOSPERMIA; PROLAPSE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VAS DEFERENS;

EID: 24044517832     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05691.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Pavlovich CP, Schlegel PN. Fertility options after vasectomy: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Fertil Steril 1997; 67: 133-41
2. Kolettis PN, Thomas AJ. Vasoepididymostomy for vasectomy reversal: a critical assessment in the era of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Urol 1997; 158: 467-70
3. Donovan JF, DiBaise M, Sparks AE, Kessler J, Sandlow JI. Comparison of microscopic epididymal sperm aspiration and intracytoplasmic sperm injection/in-vitro fertilization with repeat microscopic reconstruction following vasectomy: is second attempt vas reversal worth the effort? Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 387-93
4. Berger RE. Triangulation end-to-side vasoepididymostomy. J Urol 1998; 159: 1951-3
5. Marmar JL. Modified vasoepididymostomy with simultaneous double needle placement, tubulotomy and tubular invagination. J Urol 2000; 163: 483-6
6. Chan PT, Li PS, Goldstein M. Microsurgical vasoepididymostomy. a prospective randomized study of 3 intussusception techniques in rats. J Urol 2003; 169: 1924-9
7. Meng MV, Turek PJ. Comparison of standard and invagination vasoepididymostomy techniques. Fertil Steril 2000; 74: S88
8. World Health Organization. In Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction, 4th edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1999
9. Goldstein M. Surgical management of male infertility and other scrotal disorders. In Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED, Wein AJ eds, Campbell's Urology, 8th edn, Vol. II. Chapt 44. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2002: 1532-87
10. Goldstein M, Chan PT, Li PS. Microsurgical intussusception vasoepididymostomy: Tricks of the trade. J Urol 2003; 169: 387
11. Matthews GJ, Schlegel PN, Goldstein M. Patency following microsurgical vasoepididymostomy and vasovasostomy: temporal considerations. J Urol 1995; 154: 2070-3
12. Schlegel PN, Goldstein M. Microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: refinements and results. J Urol 1993; 150: 1165-8
13. McCallum S, Li PS, Sheynkin Y, Su LM, Chan P, Goldstein M. Comparison of intussusception pull-through end-to-side and conventional end-to-side microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: prospective randomized controlled study in male wistar rats. J Urol 2002; 167: 2284-8