Profile of different level basketball centers

Journal of Human Movement Studies

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 87-105

  Papadimitriou, K ^a   Taxildaris, K ^a   Derri, V ^a   Mantis, K ^a  

^a DEMOCRITUS UNIVERSITY OF THRACE   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24044516933     PISSN: 03067297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. ADAMS, K. R. (1994). An evaluation of the three point shot and selected variables on the point differential in basketball. Microform Publications, Int' l Institute for Sport and Human Performance: University of Oregon, Eugene.
2. BALLARINI, I. AND GUIRDANI, F. (1993). Informatique un ountil modulaple pour 1' exploitation des performances: un exeple de basket-ball. E.P.S., 43(239): 79-82.
3. BOUTMANS, J. AND DE-RAMMELAERE, E. (1988). A direct analysis of a basketball game by means of a computer. Science et Motricite, 14: 47-52.
4. COOPER, J. M. AND SIESENTOP, D. (1975). The Theory and Science of Basketball. Philadelfia: Lea & Febiger.
5. COUSY, B. (1970). Basketball. Concepts and techniques. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
6. GEZMAN, B. (1978). Struktura igre u napadu. Telesna kultura, 2: Ljubljana.
7. GRASSMANN, M., LIEBING, L., METHNER, S., & NIKOLAUS, R. (1989). Zur handlungshoehenbestimmung in der Sportart Volleyball under Beachtung technisch taktischer Leistungsparameter bei Angriff und Block mit Hilfe spezieller Videoaufnahme und rechnergestuerzrer auswertverfahren. Theorie und Praxis Leistungssport, 27: 129-144.
8. HAJNAL, L. (1990). Procena efikasnost trenaznog programa rada u kosarci. Casopic Za Fizicku Kulturu. Novi Sad, 2: 29-31.
9. KIM, A. O. (1993). Souped-up hoops: are the newest basketball video games more fun than the real thing? Sports Illustrated, 79: 8-12.
10. LAROSE, M. W. (1988). Utilizing a standard data base computer program to intentify your opponents' tendencies. Coaching Clinic, 27: 7-13.
11. LEEWALKE, A.L. AND DONAHUE, J. (1988). The new option offence for winning basketball. Champaign. Illinois: Human Kinetics Pub.
12. LIDOR, R. AND ARNON, M. (1994). The relationship between achivement in technical measurements and final placing of a Basketball team: can we predict final success based on fundamental techniques. The Zinman College at the Wingate Institute. Netanya Israel.
13. MARTIN, M. AND GROSS, J. (1990). Total performance score validation and use for basketball. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 21: 138-145.
14. MIKES, J. (1987a). Computer breakdown of percentage basketball. Scholastic Coach, 11: 52-55.
15. MIKES, J. (1987b). Percentage basketball. Scholastic Coach, 11: 82-84.
16. MULLEN, M. (1992). Basketball's newest "sixth man". By the 21 century-or sooner-basketball coaches are going to need a lot of close encounters of the first kind with computer analysis. Scholastic Coach, 61: 80-81.
17. NIKUNEN, R. AND STRAND, B. (1989). Determining player tendencies with videotape analysis. Basketball Clinic, 21: 1-5.
18. PERIC, D. AND PERIC, D (1994). Regresiv model of some elements of the basketball game. Belgrad, Yugoaslavija: University of Physical Education.
19. RAT, M. (1993). Analyse informatisee d' actions de j'en en sports collectifs: application au basket-ball. E.P.S., 43(240): 73.
20. RUBIN, P. (1995). Struktura timskih odbrambenih aktivnosti kosarkasa NBA lige. Doktorski rad. Novi Sad: Fakultet Fizicke Kulture.
21. TRUEX, J. (1988). Make those numbers compute. Women's Coaching Clinic, 12: 10-15.
22. WALSH, J. T. (1989). Putting the computer to work in your coaching. Scholastic Coach, 11: 80-81.
23. ZERAVICA, P. AND PAVLOVIC, L. (1990). Sutiranje u kosarci.